From emergency relief to structural redress: Rethinking South Africa’s SRD grant as a basic relief income program

Authors

  • Suares Clovis Oukouomi Noutchie North-West University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v14i4.4194

Keywords:

Social Relief of Distress, Basic Relief Income, Poverty alleviation, Social safety net, Inequality reduction, Social cohesion, South Africa, Digital integration

Abstract

The Social Relief of Distress (SRD) grant, introduced as an emergency measure during the COVID-19 pandemic, has become a critical support mechanism for millions of South Africans. Although initially implemented to address the immediate economic fallout of the pandemic, the grant has persisted beyond the crisis, evolving into an essential component of the country’s social protection landscape. Its discontinuation at this stage would have devastating consequences, particularly for the large population of unemployed youth in townships who rely on the grant for basic survival, including securing a daily meal. Unlike other targeted grants such as those supporting children, the elderly, or students, the SRD grant is uniquely positioned to address the needs of working-age individuals excluded from formal employment and other social programs. In a context where South Africa’s apartheid legacy continues to shape patterns of poverty, marginalisation, and inequality, the SRD grant serves not only as a poverty alleviation tool but also as a vehicle for redress and inclusion. This paper advocates for institutionalising the SRD grant by transforming it into a permanent Basic Relief Income (BRI) program, designed as a near-universal income support for working-age adults with low or no income. The BRI is envisioned as a sustainable and inclusive safety net that recognises the socio-historical context of dispossession and responds to the structural exclusion faced by millions. By framing income support as both a developmental and restorative intervention, the proposed BRI model can play a vital role in promoting economic participation, social cohesion, and long-term national stability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agence Française de Développement. (n.d.). Redesigning the South African “Social Relief Distress” grant program for higher impact. https://www.afd.fr/en/carte-des-projets/redesigning-south-african-social-relief-distress-grant-program-higher-impact

Bassier, I., Budlender, J., & Goldman, M. (2022). Social distress and (some) relief: Estimating the impact of pandemic job loss on poverty in South Africa. SA-TIED Working Paper, 210. https://sa-tied-archive.wider.unu.edu/sites/default/files/SA-TIED-WP210.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.35188/UNU-WIDER/2022/211-9

Bhorat, H., Köhler, T., & Monnakgotla, J. (2023). Social security coverage among the working-age population in South Africa. Development Policy Research Unit: Cape Town. https://www.labour.gov.za/DocumentCenter/Research%20Documents/2023/Final%20Social%20Security%20Report.pdf

Institute for Economic Justice. (2021). Financing options for a universal basic income guarantee in South Africa (Social Protection Policy Brief Series #2). https://www.iej.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/IEJ-policy-brief-UBIG-july2021_3.pdf

Kajiita, R. M., & Kang’ethe, S. M. (2024). Paradoxes of social grants in South Africa: The case of COVID-19 Social Relief of Distress Grant. E-Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences (EHASS), 5(7), 1133–1145. https://doi.org/10.38159/ehass.2024577 DOI: https://doi.org/10.38159/ehass.2024577

Kangas, O., Jauhiainen, S., Simanainen, M., & Ylikännö, M. (2019). The basic income experiment 2017–2018 in Finland: Preliminary results (Reports and Memorandums of the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health 2019:9). Ministry of Social Affairs and Health. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-00-4035-2

Khowa, T., Cimi, A., & Mukasi, T. (2022). Socio-economic impact of COVID-19 on rural livelihoods in Mbashe Municipality. Jàmbá: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies, 14(1), 1361. https://doi.org/10.4102/jamba.v14i1.1361 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/jamba.v14i1.1361

Morwane, K. (2022). Assessing the effect of the COVID-19 SRD grant on recipients' mental health [Master’s research report, University of the Witwatersrand]. WIReDSpace. https://hdl.handle.net/10539/34586

Orkin, K., Goldman, M., Kreft, B., Hlela, N., Nicklin, J., Woolard, I., & Leibbrandt, M. (2023). Proposal for the extension, redesign, and repurposing of the special COVID-19 Social Relief of Distress grant for the twin goals of poverty and unemployment reduction. SA-TIED Working Paper, 218. https://satied.wider.unu.edu/sites/default/files/KATE%20218%20_4.pdf

Seekings, J., & Nattrass, N. (2015). Policy, politics and poverty in South Africa. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137452696

South African Social Security Agency (SASSA). (n.d.). Social Relief of Distress Grant. https://www.sassa.gov.za/SitePages/Social-Relief-of-Distress-Grant.aspx

Soares, F. V., Ribas, R. P., & Osório, R. G. (2010). Evaluating the impact of Brazil’s Bolsa Família: Cash transfer programs in comparative perspective. Latin American Research Review, 45(2), 173–190. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27919200 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0023879100009390

Suri, T., & Jack, W. (2016). The long-run poverty and gender impacts of mobile money. Science, 354(6317), 1288–1292. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah5309 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah5309

Downloads

Published

2025-07-15

How to Cite

Oukouomi Noutchie, S. C. (2025). From emergency relief to structural redress: Rethinking South Africa’s SRD grant as a basic relief income program. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478), 14(4), 267–273. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v14i4.4194

Issue

Section

Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities & Social Sciences