Role of dynamic capabilities in public sector performance: a strategic management perspective

Authors

  • Pachalo Mgola Mwanza University of Zambia, Institute of Distance Education, P. O. Box 32379, Lusaka, Zambia https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7394-9417
  • Javaid Ahmad Dar Government Degree College, Kokernag, Kashmir, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v14i4.4122

Keywords:

Dynamic capabilities, public sector performance, strategic management, energy sector, organizational adaptability

Abstract

This research investigates how dynamic capabilities contribute to improving public sector performance and the degree to which strategic management facilitates their implementation. This research employs Dynamic Capabilities Theory (DCT) to assess the impact of sensing (identifying and interpreting opportunities and threats), seizing (mobilising resources to capitalise on opportunities), and transformation (realigning structures, processes, and assets to adapt to change) on organisational performance. A quantitative, non-experimental correlational research design was utilised, employing structured surveys from 193 respondents in key public energy sector enterprises in Malawi. The findings indicate that sensing and transformation capabilities substantially improve performance, while seizing capability alone does not exert a direct influence unless combined with other strategic processes. The interplay between sensing and seizing underscores the necessity for public enterprises to both identify opportunities and implement effective actions in response. Organisational capability has emerged as a vital factor, highlighting the significance of workforce competence and institutional adaptability in enhancing performance. This study advances the theory of DCT by illustrating its relevance in public sector governance constraints and presents a quantitative framework for evaluating dynamic capabilities. Policy recommendations involve enhancing seizing capability by overcoming internal bureaucratic obstacles, promoting an adaptive organisational culture, advancing leadership development, and incorporating data-driven decision-making. These measures aim to empower public enterprises to effectively manage complexity, increase responsiveness, and attain

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akenroye, T. O., Owens, J. D., Elbaz, J., & Durowoju, O. A. (2020). Dynamic capabilities for SME participation in public procurement. Business Process Management Journal, 26(4), 857-888. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-10-2019-0447 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-10-2019-0447

Alzaabi, S. H. A., Al-Dhaafri, H., & Police, D. (2018). The effect of strategy management and balanced scorecard on organizational performance of UAE civil defense. Business Management and Strategy, 9(1), 84-104. https://doi.org/10.5296/bms.v9i1.13112 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/bms.v9i1.13112

Andrews, R., Beynon, M. J., & Genc, E. (2017). Strategy implementation style and public service effectiveness, efficiency, and equity. Administrative Sciences, 7(1), 2-19. https://doi.org/10.47743/jopafl-2023-27-32 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci7010004

Angiola, N., Bianchi, P., & Damato, L. (2019). How to improve performance of public universities? A strategic management approach. Public Administration Quarterly, 43(3), 372-400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734914919043003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/073491491904300303

Antwi, S. K., & Hamza, K. (2015). Qualitative and quantitative research paradigms in business research: A philosophical reflection. European Journal of Business and Management, 7(3), 217-225. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=2505953

Apuke, O. D. (2017). Quantitative research practices: A synopsis approach. Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review (Kuwait Chapter), 6(10), 40-47. https://doi.org/10.12816/0040336 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12816/0040336

Atobishi, T., Moh’d Abu Bakir, S., & Nosratabadi, S. (2024). How do digital capabilities affect organizational performance in the public sector? The mediating role of organizational agility. Administrative Sciences, 14(2), 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14020037 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14020037

Cassell, C., Grandy, G., & Cunliffe, A. L. (2017). The SAGE handbook of qualitative business and management research methods. London: SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526430212.n15 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526430212

Castelo, S. L., & Gomes, C. F. (2023). The role of dynamic capabilities on the effectiveness of organizational changes in the public sector. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 36(4), 535-552. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5164449 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ARLA-02-2023-0031

Chiwawa, N., Wissink, H., & Fox, W. (2021). Strategic management practices in organisations with specific reference to the public sector. Africa’s Public Service Delivery & Performance Review, 9(1), 9. https://apsdpr.org/index.php/apsdpr/article/view/540/919 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/apsdpr.v9i1.540

Chnigri, Y., Sadik, M., & Slimani, H. (2024). New research perspectives on dynamic capabilities in the public sector. Alternatives Managériales Economiques, 6(4), 354-372. https://doi.org/10.48374/IMIST.PRSM/ame-v6i4.45698

Drago, H. F., de Moura, G. L., da Silva, L. S. C. V., da Veiga, C. P., Kaczam, F., Rita, L. P. S., & da Silva, W. V. (2022). Reviewing the relationship between organizational performance, dynamic capabilities, and strategic behavior. SN Business & Economics, 3(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-022-00392-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-022-00392-2

Eichhorn, B. R. (2014). Common method variance techniques. Cleveland, OH: SAS Institute Inc. Available at: https://www.lexjansen.com/mwsug/2014/AA/MWSUG-2014-AA11.pdf [Accessed 5 September 2024].

Eygü, H., & Güllüce, A. (2017). Determination of customer satisfaction in conservative concept hotels by ordinal logistic regression analysis. Journal of Financial Risk Management, 6, 269-284. https://doi.org/10.4236/jfrm.2017.63020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/jfrm.2017.63020

Furnival, J., Boaden, R., & Walshe, K. (2019). A dynamic capabilities view of improvement capability. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 33(7/8), 821-834. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-11-2018-0342 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-11-2018-0342

Gambarota, F., & Altoè, G. (2024). Ordinal regression models made easy: A tutorial on parameter interpretation, data simulation, and power analysis. International Journal of Psychology, 59(6), 1263-1292. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.13243 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.13243

Genç, E., & ?engül, R. (2015). A review on the relationship between strategic management and performance: The role of internal and external contexts. Strategic Public Management Journal, 1(2), 56-71. https://doi.org/10.25069/spmj.290425 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25069/spmj.290425

Hawrysz, L. (2018). The concept of dynamic capabilities as the answer to the changing expectations towards public sector organisations. Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarz?dzanie/Politechnika ?l?ska. http://bazekon.icm.edu.pl/bazekon/element/bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171546273

Kant, S. L. (2014). The distinction and relationship between ontology and epistemology: Does it matter? Politikon: The IAPSS Journal of Political Science, 24, 68-85. https://doi.org/10.22151/politikon.24.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22151/politikon.24.4

Khan, R., & Huda, F. (2016). The impact of strategic management on the performance of health care organizations: A study of three selected tertiary health care centers of Karachi, Pakistan. Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 1(5), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.4172/2223-5833.1000253

Kivunja, C., & Kuyini, A. B. (2017). Understanding and applying research paradigms in educational contexts. International Journal of Higher Education, 6(5), 26-41. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v6n5p26 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v6n5p26

Maijanen, P., & Jantunen, A. (2016). Dynamics of dynamic capabilities-the case of public broadcasting. International Journal of Business Excellence, 9(2), 135-155. https://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJBEX.2016.074850 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBEX.2016.074850

Mohajan, H. K. (2020). Quantitative research: A successful investigation in natural and social sciences. Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, 9(4), 50-79. https://dx.doi.org/10.26458/jedep.v9i4.679 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26458/jedep.v9i4.679

Nyagaki, B. K., Munga, J., & Nzioki, S. (2021). Influence of strategic management practices on organisational performance: A survey of commercial based parastatals in Nairobi County. Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 8(3). https://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v8i3.2052 DOI: https://doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v8i3.2052

Pardyanto, A., & Fontana, A. (2017, March). The dynamic capabilities and innovation performance of state-owned enterprises in Indonesia. In ISPIM Innovation Symposium (pp. 1-7). The International Society for Professional Innovation Management (ISPIM). https://dx.doi.org/10.2991/icbmr-17.2017.28 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/icbmr-17.2017.28

Poister, T. H., Edwards, L. H., Pasha, O. Q., & Edwards, J. (2013). Strategy formulation and performance: Evidence from local public transit agencies. Public Performance & Management Review, 36(4), 585-615. https://dx.doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576360405 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576360405

Pratiwi, N. M. (2019, October). Implementing ordinal regression model for analyzing happiness level in Indonesia. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1320, No. 1, p. 012015). IOP Publishing. https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1320/1/012015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1320/1/012015

Rabetino, R., Kohtamäki, M., & Federico, J. S. (2021). A (re)view of the philosophical foundations of strategy implementation. International Journal of Management Reviews, 23(2), 151-190. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12244 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12244

Reuning, K., & Plutzer, E. (2020). Valid vs. invalid straightlining: The complex relationship between straightlining and data quality. Survey Research Methods, 14(5), 439-459. https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2020.v14i5.7641

Samad, S., Alghafis, R., & Al-Zuman, A. (2018). Examining the effects of strategic management and organizational culture on organizational performance. Management Science Letters, 8(12), 1363-1374. https://dx.doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2018.9.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2018.9.003

Sawaneh, B. (2023). Success and impact of strategic plans implementation on public service delivery in the Gambia. Journal of Public Administration, Finance and Law, 27, 397-418. https://dx.doi.org/10.47743/jopafl-2023-27-32 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47743/jopafl-2023-27-32

Schoonenboom, J., & Johnson, R. B. (2017). How to construct a mixed practices research design. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 69(2), 107-131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-017-0454-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-017-0454-1

Singh, A. S. (2017). Common procedures for development, validity, and reliability of a questionnaire. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 5(5), 790-801. https://ijecm.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/5549.pdf

Syarief, R. (2024). Strengthening the competitiveness of state-owned enterprises. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(1), 100199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100199 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100199

Teece, D. J. (2019). A capability theory of the firm: An economics and (strategic) management perspective. New Zealand Economic Papers, 53(1), 1-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00779954.2017.1371208 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00779954.2017.1371208

Thompson, A. A., Strickland, A. J., Gamble, J., & Thompson, A. A. (2005). Crafting and executing strategy: The quest for competitive advantage: Concepts and cases. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

Tranmer, M., & Elliot, M. (2008). Multiple linear regression. The Cathie Marsh Centre for Census and Survey Research (CCSR), 5(5), 1-5. https://hummedia.manchester.ac.uk/institutes/cmist/archive-publications/working-papers/2008/2008-19-multiple-linear-regression.pdf

Urdan, T. C. (2016). Statistics in plain English (4th ed.). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315723112 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315723112

Walle, A. H. (2015). Qualitative research in business: A practical overview. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. https://www.cambridgescholars.com/product/978-1-4438-6621-7

Wu, M. J., Zhao, K., & Fils-Aime, F. (2022). Response rates of online surveys in published research: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 7, 100206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100206 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100206

Zikmund, W. G., D'Alessandro, S., Winzar, H., Lowe, B., & Babin, B. (2014). Marketing research. Sydney: Cengage Learning. https://researchoutput.csu.edu.au/en/publications/marketing-research

Downloads

Published

2025-07-15

How to Cite

Mwanza, P. M., & Ahmad Dar, J. (2025). Role of dynamic capabilities in public sector performance: a strategic management perspective. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478), 14(4), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v14i4.4122

Issue

Section

Strategic Approach to Business Ecosystem and Organizational Development