Beyond the known: analysing complexities of novice researchers in identifying and filling research gaps in social science scholarship

Radiakga Thabang Molokomme

doi:10.20525/ijrbs.v14i4.4092

Authors

Radiakga Thabang Molokomme Vaal University of Technology https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4481-4802

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v14i4.4092

Keywords:

Novice Researcher, Social Science, Scholarship. Research Capacity, Gap Identification, Methodological Training

Abstract

Identifying research gaps is a key aspect of scholarly excellence, yet it remains a challenge for many novice researchers. Despite the emphasis on innovation in academia, early-career scholars often struggle to differentiate genuine gaps from mere absences in the literature. This study examines these difficulties within social science research, exploring structural and institutional factors that shape the research journey. Using a qualitative, non-empirical approach, the study employs a systematic literature review and critical discourse analysis to synthesize scholarly arguments. Data were sourced from reputable databases, ensuring credibility through strict inclusion criteria. Thematic analysis identified key challenges, including difficulties in recognizing gaps, theoretical conceptualization, methodological rigor, and institutional constraints such as rigid paradigms, limited mentorship, and lack of interdisciplinary collaboration. Triangulation enhanced validity by evaluating sources across disciplines. Findings reveal that inadequate exposure to academic discourse, weak theoretical grounding, and insufficient methodological training hinder gap identification. The study underscores the need for structured mentorship, enhanced training, and critical engagement with theory to support emerging scholars. Addressing these barriers contributes to research capacity building in social sciences, highlighting the importance of fostering innovative and impactful academic contributions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abbott, T. (2021). Social and personality development. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003209300

Aburn, G., Gott, M., & Hoare, K. (2016). What is resilience? An integrative review of the empirical literature. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(5), 980-1000. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12888 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12888

Aikens, K., McKenzie, M., & Vaughter, P. (2018). Environmental and sustainability education policy research: A systematic review of methodological and thematic trends. Environmental and Sustainability Education Policy, 265-292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203732359-17

Aksom, H., & Tymchenko, I. (2020). How institutional theories explain and fail to explain organizations. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 33(7), 1223-1252. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-05-2019-0130 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-05-2019-0130

Alvesson, M., & Sandberg, J. (2011). Generating research questions through problematization. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 247-271. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0188 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0188

Alvesson, M., Gabriel, Y., & Paulsen, R. (2017). Return to meaning: A social science with something to say. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198787099.001.0001

Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. (1977). Social learning theory (Vol. 1, pp. 141-154). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Berenskoetter, F. (2017). Approaches to concept analysis. Millennium, 45(2), 151-173. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298166519 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829816651934

Boer, H., Holweg, M., Kilduff, M., Pagell, M., Schmenner, R., & Voss, C. (2015). Making a meaningful contribution to theory. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 35(9), 1231-1252. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-03-2015-0119 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-03-2015-0119

Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods. Oxford University Press.

C Z-Roberts, R. D., Zeidner, M., & Matthews, G. (2001). Does emotional intelligence? 3.

Casanave, C. P., & Li, Y. (2015). Novices’ struggles with conceptual and theoretical framing in writing dissertations and papers for publication. Publications, 3(2), 104-119. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications3020104 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/publications3020104

Chen, N. C., Drouhard, M., Kocielnik, R., Suh, J., & Aragon, C. R. (2018). Using machine learning to support qualitative coding in social science: Shifting the focus to ambiguity. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS), 8(2), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1145/3185515 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3185515

Christofi, M., Pereira, V., Vrontis, D., Tarba, S., & Thrassou, A. (2021). Agility and flexibility in international business research: A comprehensive review and future research directions. Journal of World Business, 56(3), 101194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2021.101194 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2021.101194

Chun Tie, Y., Birks, M., & Francis, K. (2019). Grounded theory research: A design framework for novice researchers. SAGE Open Medicine, 7, https://doi.org/10.1177/20503121188229 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312118822927

Coppedge, M. (2012). Democratization and research methods. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139016179

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.

Davis, B. H., & Resta, V. K. (2002). Online collaboration: Supporting novice teachers as researchers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(1), 101-117. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/9305/

Donkoh, S., & Mensah, J. (2023). Application of triangulation in qualitative research. Journal of Applied Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 10(1), 6-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15406/jabb.2023.10.00319

Duggal, H. K., Lim, W. M., Khatri, P., Thomas, A., & Shiva, A. (2024). The state of the art on self?perceived employability. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 43(4), 88-110. https://doi.org/10.1002/joe.22245 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/joe.22245

Eggers, J. P., & Park, K. F. (2018). Incumbent adaptation to technological change: The past, present, and future of research on heterogeneous incumbent response. Academy of Management Annals, 12(1), 357-389. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2016.0051 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2016.0051

Fellows, R. F., & Liu, A. M. (2021). Research methods for construction. John Wiley & Sons.

Frost, N. (2021). Qualitative research methods in psychology: Combining core approaches (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill Education (UK).

Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. University of California Press.

Hall, K. L., Vogel, A. L., Huang, G. C., Serrano, K. J., Rice, E. L., Tsakraklides, S. P., & Fiore, S. M. (2018). The science of team science: A review of the empirical evidence and research gaps on collaboration in science. American Psychologist, 73(4), 532. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000319 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000319

Hart, C. (2018). Doing a literature review: Releasing the research imagination.

Horton, A. A., Walton, A., Spurgeon, D. J., Lahive, E., & Svendsen, C. (2017). Microplastics in freshwater and terrestrial environments: Evaluating the current understanding to identify the knowledge gaps and future research priorities. Science of the Total Environment, 586, 127-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.190 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.190

Huiberts, E. (2016). Building bridges, filling gaps: Toward an integrative interdisciplinary and mixed method approach for future audience research in relation to the mediation of distant suffering. International Journal of Communication, 10, 21.

Hyland, K. (2016). Academic publishing: Issues and challenges in the construction of knowledge.

Kneeland, M. K., Schilling, M. A., & Aharonson, B. S. (2020). Exploring uncharted territory: Knowledge search processes in the origination of outlier innovation. Organization Science, 31(3), 535-557. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2019.1328 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2019.1328

Kubota, R., & Miller, E. R. (2017). Re-examining and re-envisioning criticality in language studies: Theories and praxis. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 14(2-3), 129-157. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2017.1290500 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2017.1290500

Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press.

Kumar, R. (2025). Bibliometric analysis: Comprehensive insights into tools, techniques, applications, and solutions for research excellence. Spectrum of Engineering and Management Sciences, 3(1), 45-62. https://doi.org/10.31181/sems31202535k DOI: https://doi.org/10.31181/sems31202535k

Lindberg, J. (2022). Female risk-assessment and career path: A qualitative study of the role of risk, ontological security, and immanence in law students’ future occupational choices.

Luft, J. A., Jeong, S., Idsardi, R., & Gardner, G. (2022). Literature reviews, theoretical frameworks, and conceptual frameworks: An introduction for new biology education researchers. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 21(3), rm33. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-05-0134 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-05-0134

Makuyana, T., Nhamo, G., & Dube, K. (2023). The Great OR Tambo International Airport Flood: Dealing with the harsh realities of climate-induced extreme weather events. https://doi.org/10.46222/ajhtl.19770720.464

May, T., & Perry, B. (2022). Social research: Issues, methods and process. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).

Molokomme, R. T. (2025). Criminal risk associated with failed transactions: Examining the rise of transactional relationships among financially strained students in higher education. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 9(4), 2681-2691. https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v9i5.6639 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v9i5.6639

Na’ilah Suad Nasir, J. S., Trujillo, T., & Hernández, L. (2016). The socio-political context of teaching. In Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 349). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/978-0-935302-48-6_5

Ntsobi, M. P., Costa, A. P., Kasperiuniene, J., Brandão, C., & Ribeiro, J. (2024, January). Digital tools and techniques in qualitative research: Digital skills and research optimisation. In World Conference on Qualitative Research (pp. 1-25). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-65735-1_1

Otto, D., Schroeder, N., Diekmann, D., & Sander, P. (2021). Trends and gaps in empirical research on open educational resources (OER): A systematic mapping of the literature from 2015 to 2019. Contemporary Educational Technology, 13(4), ep325. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/11145 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/11145

Papaioannou, D., Sutton, A., & Booth, A. (2016). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review (pp. 1-336).

Patil, D. D., & Wagh, B. D. (2023). Research methodologies in multidisciplinary subjects (Volume-1). Academic Guru Publishing House.

Piaget, J. (1972). The psychology of intelligence. Littlefield Adams.

Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. Hutchinson. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3060577

Purssell, E., & McCrae, N. (2020). How to perform a systematic literature review: A guide for healthcare researchers, practitioners and students. Springer Nature. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49672-2

Ravetz, J. R. (2020). Scientific knowledge and its social problems. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003075158

Rawluk, A., Ford, R., Anderson, N., & Williams, K. (2019). Exploring multiple dimensions of values and valuing: A conceptual framework for mapping and translating values for social-ecological research and practice. Sustainability Science, 14, 1187-1200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0639-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0639-1

Salganik, M. J. (2019). Bit by bit: Social research in the digital age. Princeton University Press.

Shi, F. (2021). Using technology-based tools in ensuring quality of publishable journal articles: The case of Chinese undergraduate research writing experience. Education and Information Technologies, 26(4), 4203-4219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10444-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10444-z

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Terry, G., Hayfield, N., Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. In The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology (2nd ed., pp. 17-37). SAGE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526405555.n2

Turner, J. R., & Baker, R. M. (2019). Complexity theory: An overview with potential applications for the social sciences. Systems, 7(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems7010004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/systems7010004

Turner, S. F., Cardinal, L. B., & Burton, R. M. (2017). Research design for mixed methods: A triangulation-based framework and roadmap. Organizational Research Methods, 20(2), 243-267. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428115610 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428115610808

Williams, S. (2024). Bridging the gap: Understanding challenges faced by novice educators in the practical teaching phase. European International Journal of Philological Sciences, 4(04), 1-7. https://inlibrary.uz/index.php/eijps/article/view/34092

Winget, M., & Persky, A. M. (2022). A practical review of mastery learning. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 86(10), ajpe8906. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe8906 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe8906

Zafar, S., Kamran, M., Raza, H., & Mehtab, A. (2021). Challenges faced by novice research students at undergraduate level: A qualitative study at institute of education and research. Review of Applied Management and Social Sciences, 4(2), 411-420. https://doi.org/10.47067/ramss.v4i2.142 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47067/ramss.v4i2.142