Revisiting the January effect anomaly: evidence from international stock markets
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v13i4.3273Keywords:
January effect, financial markets, F-statistics test; Efficiency Market HypothesisAbstract
A recurring theme in the literature and discussion of stock market analysis is the concept of the January effect which essentially implies buy in December and sell in January. The January effect is based on the perceived seasonality trend where short term investors hope to take advantage of the arbitrage opportunity between December and January. However, this perceived anomaly continues is seen as a myth and has been strongly rejected by many market participants in the current dispensation. The purpose of this paper was to investigate the January effect in the Nikkei 225, JSE, CAC 40, DAX, and the NASDAQ Index from February 2019 to February 2024. A F-test statistics was used to explore the phenomenon. The findings indicated that there is no significant difference between the realised returns in January and those of the other month for the most recent five years. This led to the conclusion that, while the January effect may have been observed, it is no longer evident in financial markets, hence market participants should avoid using this type of arbitrage approach because it may result in massive losses
Downloads
References
Adil, M., Singh, Y., & Ansari, M. S. (2022). How financial literacy moderate the association between behaviour biases and investment decision? Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 7(1), 17–30 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AJAR-09-2020-0086
Almansour, B.Y., Elkrghli, S., & Almansour, A.Y. (2023). Behavioral finance factors and investment decisions: A mediating role of risk perception. Cogent Economics & Finance, 11(2239032), 1-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2023.2239032
Anderson, L.R., Gerlach, J.R., & Ditraglia, F.J. (2005). Yes, Wall Street, There Is a January Effect. College of William and Mary working papers. (WP15).
Asteriou, D., & Kavetsos, G. (2006). Testing for the Existence of the ‘January Effect’ in Transition Economies. Applied Financial Economics Letters, 2(6), 375-381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17446540600706817
Chen, J. (2024). January Effect: What It Is in the Stock Market, Possible Causes. Available at < January Effect: What It Is in the Stock Market, Possible Causes > Retrieved on 14-03-2024.
Cristiana, T. (2021). Investors’ trading activity and information asymmetry: Evidence from the Romanian stock market. Risks, 9(8), 149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/risks9080149
Dom, R. & Miller, M. (2018). Reforming tax systems in the developing world: What can we learn from the past? ODI Report, Overseas Development Institute (ODI), London.
Enescu, A.G. (2022). Assessment of day-of-the-week effect and other stock market anomalies: Romanian evidence. Journal of Smart Economic Growth,7(3), 1-12.
Enow, S.T. (2022). Modelling Stock Market Prices Using the Open, High and Closes Prices. Evidence from International Financial Markets. International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research, 15(3), 52-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25103/ijbesar.153.04
Enow, S.T. (2023). A Non-linear Dependency Test for Market Efficiency: Evidence from International Stock Markets. Journal of Economics and Financial Analysis, 7(1), 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32479/ijefi.13752
Fada, S. (2019). Testing the random walk hypothesis of stock indexes through variance-ratio. Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences,7(1), 12 – 19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21533/pen.v7i1.212
Fama, E. F. (1965). Random Walks in Stock Market Prices. Financial Analysts Journal, 21(5), 55–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v21.n5.55
Hendrawaty, E., & Huzaimah, R. A. F. (2019). Testing of January Effect, the Day of the Week Effect, and Size Effect: a Study of LQ45 Stocks in Indonesia Stock Exchange. Journal Dinamika Manajemen, 10(2), 173-184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jdm.v10i2.20620
Kamran, Q., & Ashok, B. (2022). Are professional fund managers less likely to sell winners? Evaluating how attention allocation impacts behavioural biases. IIMB Management Review, 34(1), 29-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2022.04.001
Kao, L.S., & Green, C.E. (2008). Analysis of variance: is there a difference in means and what does it mean? J Surg Res,144(1), 158-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2007.02.053
Kartini, K., & Nahda, K. (2021). Behavioral biases on investment decision: A case study in Indonesia. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics & Business, 8(3), 1231–1240
Nisar, S., Asif, R., & Ali, A. (2021). Testing the Presence of the January Effect in Developed Economies. Munich Personal Achive. Online (Testing the Presence of the January Effect in Developed Economies Munich Personal RePEc Archive (uni-muenchen.de)
Patel, J.B. (2016). The January Effect Anomaly Reexamined in Stock Returns. The Journal of Applied Business Research, 32(1), 317-324. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19030/jabr.v32i1.9540
Perez, G. G. A. (2018). Does the January effect still exist? International Journal of Financial Research, 9(1), 50–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5430/ijfr.v9n1p50
Truong, L.D., & Friday, H.S. (2021). The January Effect and Lunar New Year Influences in Frontier Markets: Evidence from Vietnam Stock Market. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 11(2), 28-34 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32479/ijefi.10928
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Samuel Tabot Enow
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
For all articles published in IJRBS, copyright is retained by the authors. Articles are licensed under an open access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download and read the paper for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted provided that the original published version is cited. These conditions allow for maximum use and exposure of the work, while ensuring that the authors receive proper credit.
