Exploring the effects of technology integration in the learning and teaching of mathematics
A case of one rural university in the Eastern Cape, South Africa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v12i2.2386Keywords:
behaviour; challenges; discipline; effective; guidance; learning; quality; resources; support; teaching; workloadAbstract
This paper presents the effects of technology integration in the learning and teaching of Mathematics in first- and second-year mathematics students. The technology-based learning environment has been the demand in groundwork learning to shape a more active approach to students' learning process. The South African government has made an obligation to advance its people's Information and Communication Technology (ICT) skills and to connect the digital gap by targeting previously disadvantaged groups. The interpretive approach was used with face-to-face interviews to collect data from ten participants. Six participants were interviewed by the lecturers teaching mathematics and four students doing mathematics in one of the rural universities in the Eastern Cape. Findings confirmed that (i) Teacher technology competence and lack of resources are barriers to technology learning implementation. (ii) Consequently, it became evident that learners had a robust positive perception of computer usage in Mathematics learning and teaching even though almost all had little or no access to computers in their schools. It is recommended that the university should ensure that all students have the data card loaded with uncapped data for learning and teaching to run smoothly.
Downloads
References
Alharahsheh, H. H., & Pius, A. (2020). A review of key paradigms: Positivism VS interpretivism. Global Academic Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(3), 39-43. Avilable online at https://gajrc.com/gajhss.
Baykul, Y. (2014). ?lkokulda matematik ö?retimi (12. Bask?). Ankara: Pegem Akademi. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2020.3962. Accessed April 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2020.3962
Bingimlas, K. A. (2009). Barriers to the successful integration of ICT in teaching and learning environments: A review of the literature. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, science and technology education, 5(3), 235-245. https://doi.org/10.12973/ ejmste/75275 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75275
Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2012). Defining twenty-first century skills. In Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 17-66). Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2324-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5_2
Bray, A., & Tangney, B. (2017). Technology usage in mathematics education research–A systematic review of recent trends. Computers & Education, 114, 255-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.07.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.07.004
Chao, C. C. (2015). Rethinking transfer: Learning from CALL teacher education as consequential transition. Language Learning & Technology, 19(1), 102-118. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/issues/february2015/chao.pdf.
Daly, I., Bourgaize, J., & Vernitski, A. (2019). Mathematical mindsets increase student motivation: Evidence from the EEG. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 15, 18-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. tine.2019.02.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2019.02.005
Department of Education. (2004). White paper on e-education: Transforming learning and teaching through information and communication technologies (ICT's). Government Gazette, 26762.
Doan, A. (2012, May). Social media, data integration, and human computation. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Workshop on Information Integration on the Web (pp. 1-1). https://doi.org/10.1145/2331801.2331810. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2331801.2331810
Donevska-Todorova, A., & Trgalova, J. (2017). Learning mathematics with technology. A review of recent CERME research. CERME 10.
Drijvers, P., Kieran, C., Mariotti, M. A., Ainley, J., Andresen, M., Chan, Y. C., & Meagher, M. (2009). Integrating technology into mathematics education: Theoretical perspectives. In Mathematics education and technology-rethinking the terrain (pp. 89-132). Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0146-0_7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0146-0_7
Drijvers, P., Tacoma, S., Besamusca, A., Doorman, M., & Boon, P. (2013). Digital resources inviting changes in mid-adopting teachers’ practices and orchestrations. ZDM, 45(7), 987-1001. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17187-6_8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0535-1
Flood, V. J., Shvarts, A., & Abrahamson, D. (2020). Teaching with embodied learning technologies for mathematics: responsive teaching for embodied learning. ZDM, 52(7), 1307-1331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01165-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01165-7
Galligan, L., Hobohm, C., & Loch, B. (2012). Tablet technology to facilitate improved interaction and communication with students studying mathematics at a distance. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 31(4), 363-385. Retrieved March 23, 2023 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/40575.
Groff, J. (2013). Technology-rich innovative learning environments. OCED CERI Innovative Learning Environment project, 2013, 1-30.
Howells, K. (2018). The future of education and skills: education 2030: the future we want. http://www.oecd.org/education/2030/E2030%20Position%20Paper%20(05.04.2018).pdf.
Imenda, S. (2014). Is there a conceptual difference between theoretical and conceptual frameworks? Journal of social sciences, 38(2), 185-195. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718923.2014.11893249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09718923.2014.11893249
Indicators, O. E. C. D. (2012). Education at a Glance 2016. Editions OECD, 90. http://dx.doi.org/10.187/eag-2016-en.
Kelly, S. E., Bourgeault, I., & Dingwall, R. (2010). Qualitative interviewing techniques and styles. The SAGE handbook of qualitative methods in health research, 307-326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446268247.n17
Khirwadkar, A., Khan, S. I., Mgombelo, J., Obradovic-Ratkovic, S., & Forbes, W. A. (2020). Reimagining Mathematics Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Brock Education: A Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 29(2), 42-46. https://journals.library.brocku.ca/brocked. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26522/brocked.v29i2.839
Khouyibaba, S. (2010). Teaching mathematics with technology. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 638-643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.210
Larkin, K., & Milford, T. (2018). Mathematics apps—Stormy with the weather clearing: Using cluster analysis to enhance app use in mathematics classrooms. In Using mobile technologies in the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 11-30). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007 /s13394-015-0167-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90179-4_2
Liamputtong, P. (2007). Researching the vulnerable: A guide to sensitive research methods. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/978184920986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209861
Maina, M. J. (2010). Strategies employed by secondary school principals to improve academic performance in Embu West District. Unpublished master thesis). Kenyatta University, Kenya. Available at https://irlibrary.ku.ac.ke/bitstream/handle/123456789/930/Mwaura%2C%20James%20Maina pdf?sequence=3. Accessed 25 April 2018.
Maria, M., Shahbodin, F., & Pee, N. C. (2018, September). Malaysian higher education system towards industry 4.0–current trends overview. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2016, No. 1, p. 020081). AIP Publishing LLC. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200620.068. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5055483
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2008, March). Introducing technological pedagogical content knowledge. In annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Vol. 1, p. 16). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006. 00684.
Mishra, P. (2019). Considering contextual knowledge: The TPACK diagram gets an upgrade. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 35(2), 76-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2019.1588611. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2019.1588611
Oduma, C. A., & Ile, C. M. (2014). ICT education for teachers and ICT supported instruction: problems and prospects in the Nigerian education system. African Research Review, 8(2), 199-216. http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/afrrev.v8i2.12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/afrrev.v8i2.12
O'Neal, L. J., Gibson, P., & Cotten, S. R. (2017). Elementary school teachers' beliefs about the role of n technology in 21st-century teaching and learning. Computers in the Schools, 34(3), 192-206. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2017.1347443. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2017.1347443
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and policy in mental health and mental health services research, 42(5), 533-544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
Rashid, Y., Rashid, A., Warraich, M. A., Sabir, S. S., & Waseem, A. (2019). Case study method: A step-by-step guide for business researchers. International journal of qualitative methods, 18, https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919862424. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919862424
Saxena, R., Bhat, V., & Jhingan, A. (2017). Leapfrogging to Education 4.0: Student at the core. FICC Higher Edu cation Committee.
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education, 128, 13-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009
Silva, O., Sousa, Á., & Nunes, J. (2021, February). Factors that affect student’s attitudes towards statistics and technology and their interrelationships. In International Conference on Information Technology & Systems (pp. 157-166). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68418-1_17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68418-1_17
Sinclair, N. (2020). On teaching and learning mathematics–technologies. In STEM teachers and teaching in the digital era (pp. 91-107). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29396-3_6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29396-3_6
Sipilä, K. (2014). Educational use of information and communications technology: Teachers’ perspective. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 23(2), 225-241. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2013.813407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2013.813407
Tabach, M. (2011). A mathematics teacher’s practice in a technological environment: A case study analysis using two complementary theories. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 16(3), 247-265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-011-9186-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-011-9186-x
Ukobizaba, F., Ndihokubwayo, K., Mukuka, A., & Uwamahoro, J. (2021). From what makes students dis¬like mathematics towards its effective teaching practices. Bolema: Boletim de Educação Matemática, 35(70), 1200–1216. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-4415v35n70a30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-4415v35n70a30
Viberg, O., & Mavroudi, A. (2018, September). The role of ubiquitous computing and the internet of things for developing 21 st century skills among learners: Experts’ views. In European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (pp. 640-643). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98572-5_63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98572-5_63
Virtanen, M. A., Haavisto, E., Liikanen, E., & Kääriäinen, M. (2018). Ubiquitous learning environments in higher education: A scoping literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 23(2), 985-998. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9646-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9646-6
Wager, A. A. (2012). Incorporating out-of-school mathematics: From cultural context to embedded practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 15(1), 9-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-011-9199-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-011-9199-3
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Thabisa Maqoqa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
For all articles published in IJRBS, copyright is retained by the authors. Articles are licensed under an open access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download and read the paper for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted provided that the original published version is cited. These conditions allow for maximum use and exposure of the work, while ensuring that the authors receive proper credit.
