The challenges of procurement process for the department of correctional services
The road to procurement process
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v12i2.2378Keywords:
Procurement Procedures, Supply Chain Management, Logistics, Sustainable Public Procurement, Service DeliveryAbstract
This study aims to determine the procurement process challenges for improving the Department of Correctional Services (DCS). All the participants recruited by the researcher were not forced to participate or sign the consent form. The researcher considered only voluntary participation and the participants were requested to sign the POPI Act consent forms before conducting the face-to-face interview. The study adopted a qualitative research methodology to get a comprehensive and deeper understanding of the challenges and effects of the procurement process. Information was collected from the key informants using Face-to-face interviews; the key informants were possible suppliers, chief executors, executors, and directors. Managers specializing in the procurement field and potential suppliers were chosen as respondents to obtain sentiments toward the procurement process. The study established that (DCS) is one of the national departments faced with the challenges of improving the procurement process. Hence the case study focuses on procurement process challenges for the improvement of the DCS. The study concluded that most of the fruitless, wasteful and irregular, and unauthorized expenditures incurred in DCS are caused by a lack of availability of resources such as employment finances and a lack of technology due to resistance to change from the top management to the lower level.
Downloads
References
Auditor-General of South Africa (AGSA). (2019). Status of progress on the audit outcomes. Auditor-General of South Africa. Auditor-General of South Africa (AGSA). (2021). Status of progress on the audit outcomes. Auditor-General of South Africa.
Creswell., J.W., Ebersohn L., Eloff I., Ferreira R., Ivankova N.V., Jansen J.D., Nieuwenhuis J., Pietersen J., & Piano Clark V.L., (2019). First Step in Research. 3th ed. Los Angeles: SAGE.
CVC, (2017). Annual Report 2016. New Delhi: Central Vigilance Commission, Government of India.
DGS & D., (2017). Annual Report 2015-2016. New Delhi: Directorate General of Supplies & Disposals, Government of India.
European-Comission. (2019). Public Procurement Indicators 2017. Retrieved from Brussels: http://ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/20679/attachments/1/translations/en/renditions/n ative
Greasley, S. (2020). Privatizing the blame game: Corporate reputation in the outsourced state. Public Money and Management, 40(2), 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-14-02-2014-B001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/25741136.2019.1665929
Jones, E. (2019). Rethinking Greenwashing: Corporate Discourse, Unethical Practice, and the Unmet Potential of Ethical Consumerism. Sociological Perspectives, 0731121419849095. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121419849095
Keellehear, A 2020, The unobtrusive researcher: a guide to methods, Routledge DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003137344
Mante., T.G., Kojo. Z.P., Eric. K.E & Oheneasi. E.E., 2022, (Factors affecting procurement performance in the case of Comet properties limited”, European academic Research journal 7(12), 5972_5297.
Manyathi S.,Alewyn P.J,Burger,.Nimrod L., & Moritmer.,2021 (Public sector procurement : A private sector procurement perspective for improved service delivery, (9)1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/apsdpr.v9i1.521
Manzini, P., Lubbe, S., Klopper, R., & Meyer, J. (2019). Improvement of infrastructure delivery through effective supply chain management at north west Sibanda et al., Cogent Business & Management (2020), 7: 1785105 https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1785105 Page 12 of 14 provincial department of public works and roads. Journal of Public Administration, 54(1), 117–129. https://0-hdl.handle.net.wam.seals.ac.za/10520/EJC1a9f9fb55b.
Mhelembe, K., & Mafini, C. (2019). Modelling the link between supply chain risk, flexibility and performance in the public sector. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 22(1), a2368. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v22i1.2368 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v22i1.2368
Rahayu, S., Yudi, & Rahayu. (2020). Internal auditors role indicators and their support of good governance. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), 1751020. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1751020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1751020
South Africa (Republic). (2019). Auditor General South Africa. AGSA Media Release: Auditor-General report “Act Now on Accountability”:1–19. Available at: https://www.agsa.co.za/Portals/0/Reports/PFMA/201819/MR/2019%20PFMA%20media%20release.pdf (accessed on 30 March 2020).
South Africa (Republic). (2021). National Treasury. PFMA SCM Instruction No.02 of 2021/2022. Available at: http://www.treasury.gov.za (Accessed 15 September 2021).
South Africa, Republic (RSA). (1996). Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996. Pretoria (ZA): Government Printer.
South Africa, Republic (RSA). (1998a). Correctional Services Act, 1998 (Act 111 of 1998). Pretoria (ZA): Government Printer.
South Africa, Republic (RSA). (1999b). Public Finance Management Act, 1999 (Act 1 of 1999) (PFMA). Pretoria (ZA): Government Printer.
South Africa, Republic (RSA). (2000c). Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act, 2000 (Act 5 of 2000) (PPPFA). Pretoria (ZA): Government Printer.
South Africa, Republic (RSA). (2003f). Public Procurement Act, 2003 (Act 2663 of 2003) (PDA). Pretoria (ZA): Government Printer.
Shakya RK (2019) Green public procurement strategies for environmental sustainability. Engineering Science Reference. World Bank, USA. https://www.igi-global. Com/book/green-public-procurement-strategies-environmental/202761 Theron C, Dowden M (World Bank (2020). Benchmarking public procurement 2020: Assessing public procurement systems in 180 economies, Washington, DC.
World Bank (2019). Benchmarking public procurement 2019: Assessing public procurement systems in 180 economies, Washington, DC.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Tafadzwa Clementine Maramura, Ntsieni Douglas Lebete
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
For all articles published in IJRBS, copyright is retained by the authors. Articles are licensed under an open access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download and read the paper for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted provided that the original published version is cited. These conditions allow for maximum use and exposure of the work, while ensuring that the authors receive proper credit.
