Fetching water with a leaking container: Female offenders’ rehabilitation programme limitation, South Africa

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v11i2.1691

Keywords:

Female offender(s), correctional center, programme, recidivism, rehabilitation, South Africa

Abstract

Over the three decades, the democratic dispensation ushered in transformative constitutionalism which is an ideal model to anchor constitutionalism and respect for human rights in South Africa. Female offenders are the key informants of this study, as they are the end-users of the rehabilitation programmes that the Department of Correctional Services (DCS) offers. A qualitative technique was used for this study. In-depth interviews were conducted with a total of 10 female ex-offenders, who have been enrolled in rehabilitative programmes were selected using purposive sampling to explore their experiences and or views. The findings of this study indicate that lack of offense-specific programmes s results in recidivism and offenders re-entering the correctional system to repeat the same programmes to meet their parole requirements. Furthermore, highlighted in the findings is the magnitude of the lack of understanding among most criminal justice professionals regarding the actual need for the programmes earmarked for female offenders. The risk factors of female offending identified within this study include poverty, anger, and drug use. Although the DCS has firm policy documents in place, implementing these has failed the offenders and negatively impacted recidivism rates.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Krinesha George, University of KwaZulu-Natal

 

Krinesha George is a lecturer at the Department of Criminology and Forensic Studies and her research interest is female offenders and rehabilitation. She is experienced Career Advisor with a demonstrated history of working in the education management industry. Skilled in Communication, Research, Administration, Leadership, Project management and Data Analysis. 

Ephraim Sibanyoni, University of South Africa

Ephraim Kevin Sibanyoni is an Associate Professor, researcher in the field of criminology and forensic studies from the Department of Corrections Management,  University of South Africa. His research interest includes human trafficking/Albino killings for the purpose of body parts to create traditional medicine (muthi murder); gender based violence, sexual offenses acts committed by children against other children, male on male sexual violence in correctional services, victim profiling, and offender profiling.

He has attended and presented in various international and national research conferences and supervised numerous master’s doctorate students to completion. He has numerous research publications and serves in the departmental research higher degree committee as well as in the editorial board of the All-African journal of criminal justice. He is involved in various community engagement initiatives and he is a member of the Criminological society of Africa (CRIMSA); All Africa Criminal Justice Society; and International Criminology Society. 

References

Agboola, C. (2016). Memories of the 'inside': Conditions in South African women's prisons. South African Crime Quarterly, 56, 19-26. https://doi.org/10.17159/2413-3108/2016/.

Alward, L. M., Caudy, M. S., & Viglione, J. (2020). Assessing the relative influence of individual attitudes, social supports, and neighborhood context on reentry outcomes. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 47(11), 1487-1508. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854819901158

Beall, S. K. (2018). “Lock her up!” How women have become the fastest-growing population in the American carceral state. Berkeley Journal of Criminal Law, 23(2), 1-39. https://doi.org/10.2307/3408954

Blanchette, K., Gobeil, R. & Stewart, L. 2016. A Meta-Analytic Review of Correctional Interventions for Women Offenders: Gender-Neutral Versus Gender-Informed Approaches. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43(3), 301-322.

Brink, H. (1996). Fundamentals of research methodology for health care professionals (p. 337). Kenwyn: Juta.

Brink, P. J. & Wood, M. J. (1998). Advanced designs in nursing research. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32(7), 513-531. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.32.7.513.

Bronson, J. & Carson, E. A. (2019). Prisoners in 2017. Age, 500, 400. Retrieved from www.bjs.gov.

Butorac, K., Gracin, D. & Stanic, N. (2017). The challenges in reducing criminal recidivism. Public Security and Public Order, 18, 115-131.

Cooper, A. D., Durose, M. R., & Snyder, H.N. (2014). Recidivism of prisoners released in 30 states in 2005: Patterns from 2005 to 2010. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. Retrieved from http://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=4986.

Cullen, F. T., & Gendreau, P. (1989). The effectiveness of correctional rehabilitation. In L. Goodstein & D. L. MacKenzie (Eds.), The American prison Law, society and policy (pp. 23-27). Springer.

Dadashazar, N. (2017). Offender Recidivism: A Quantitative Study of Motivational Risk Factors and Counseling. Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies.

Department of Correctional Services (DCS). (2020, March 12). Department of Correctional Services. Retrieved from Department of Correctional Services: http://www.dcs.gov.za/.

Department of Correctional Services (DCS). (2021). Department of Correctional Services. Retrieved February 2, 2022, from Department of Correctional Services: http://www.dcs.gov.za/.

Durose, M. R., Cooper, A. D. & Snyder, H. N. (2014). Recidivism of prisoners released in 30 states in 2005: Patterns from 2005 to 2010. Retrieved from http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/rprts05p0510.pdf.

Fazel, S. & Wolf, A. (2015). A Systematic Review of Criminal Recidivism Rates Worldwide: Current Difficulties and Recommendations for Best Practice. PloS One, 10(6), e0130390.

Fleming, E., Wright, F. L., Wurzburg, S., Ney, B., et al. (2021). Adopting a Gender-Responsive Approach for Women in the Justice System: A Resource Guide. New York: The Council of State Governments Justice Center.

Florida Tech. (2019). Recidivism: What it is and how to prevent it. Retrieved from https://studycorgi.com/recidivism-what-it-is-and-how-to-prevent-it/#apa-6.

Freudenberg, N. & Heller, D. (2016). A Review of Opportunities to Improve the Health of People Involved in the Criminal Justice System in the United States. Annual Review of Public Health, 37(1), 313-33.

Gaum, G., Hoffman, S. & Venter, J. (2006). Factors that Influence Adult Recidivism: An Exploratory Study in Pollsmoor Prison. South African Journal of Psychology, 407-424.

Haffeejee, S., Vetten, L. & Greyling, M. (2005). Exploring violence in the lives of women and girls incarcerated at three prisons in Gauteng Province, South Africa. Agenda, 40-47.

Hopkins, R. (2017). This Is What Life In Prison Is Really Like For Women In South Africa. Wits Justice Project.

Hopkins, R. (2017). Wits Justice Project. Retrieved from www.witsjusticeproject.co.za.

James, N. (2015). Offender reentry: Correctional statistics, reintegration into the community, and recidivism [Report]. Congressional Research Service. Retrieved from https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL34287.pdf.

Joiner, M. N. (2011). What is the impact of gender-responsive treatment on women offenders? College of Professional Studies (Marquette University).

Khwela, M. N. (2015). Effects of incarceration on recidivism in South Africa. Journal of Public Administration, 50(2), 407-413.

Link, N. W., Ward, J. T., & Stansfield, R. (2019). Consequences of mental and physical health for reentry and recidivism: Toward a health-based model of desistance. Criminology, 57, 544-573. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12213.

Mciver, C. B. (2020). Exploring the Challenges of Reentry Among Female Former Offenders. Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies. 9601. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/9601.

Miller, H. V. 2021. Female Re-entry and Gender-Responsive Programming: Recommendations for Policy and Practice. NIJ UPDATE. Corrections Today (May/June): 12-18. Retrieved from https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/300931.pdf.

Miller, H. V. & Miller, J. M. (2015). A promising jail reentry program revisited: Results from a quasi-experimental design. Criminal Justice Studies, 28(2), 211-225. https://doi.org/10.1080/1478601X.2014.1000489

Moles-López E, Añaños FT. 2021. Factors of Prison Recidivism in Women: A Socioeducational and Sustainable Development Analysis. Sustainability, 13(11), 5822. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13115822

Morash, M., Bynum, T. S. & Koo, B. A. (1998). Women Offenders: Programming Needs and Promising Approaches. National Institute of Justice (pp. 1-12). Retrieved from National Institute of Justice.

Mowen, T. J. & Boman, J. H. (2019). Do we have it all wrong? The protective roles of peers and criminogenic risks from family during prison reentry. Crime & Delinquency, 65(5), 681-704. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128718800286

National Institue for Crime Prevention and the Reintegration of Offenders. (2020, June 13). South African National Institute for Crime Prevention and the Reintegration of Offenders. Retrieved from https://www.nicro.org.za/.

Nelani, A. (2020). The Role of Reading in Offender Rehabilitation and Reintegration into the Community in the Western Cape Metro, South Africa”. Mousaion: South African Journal of Information Studies, 38(3), 16 pages. https://doi.org/10.25159/2663-659X/7958.

Ondeng, A. M. J. (2018). Effectiveness of offender rehabilitation programmes in addressing the psychological needs of women offenders within the prisons in Kenya. Unpublished thesis Submitted to the School of Humanities and Social Sciences in Partial Fulfilment of the requirement for the award of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Counseling Psychology) of Kenyatta University.

Prison Fellowship Organisation. (2021, May). Prison Fellowship Organisation. Retrieved from Prison Fellowship Organisation: https://www.prisonfellowship.org/.

Ragophala, L. & Mofokeng, J. (2014). An empirical investigation of women shoplifting in Gauteng North. Acta Criminologica: Southern African Journal of Criminology Special Edition No.1/2014: Research and application in Criminology and Criminal Justice, 53-70.

Renn, K. A., & Arnold, K. D. (2003). Reconceptualizing Research on College Student Peer Culture. The Journal of Higher Education, 74(3), 261-293.

Sawyer, W. (2018). The gender divide: Tracking women’s state prison growth. Prison Policy Initiative, 9. Retrieved from www.prisonpolicy.org.

Steyn, F. & Booyens, K. (2017). A profile of incarcerated female offenders: implications for rehabilitation policy and practice. Acta Criminologica: Southern African Journal of Criminology, 30(4), 33-54.

Thailand Institute of Justice. 2021. Global Prison Trends 2021. Special Focus - Prisons in crises. Retrieved from https://cdn.penalreform.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Global-prison-trends-2021.pdf.

Tillson, M., Dickson, M.F., Webster, J.M. & Staton, M. (2022). Community Relationship Quality and Reincarceration Following Rural Drug-Using Women’s Reentry from Jail. Criminal Justice and Behavior, XX(X), 1-19.

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2022). Module 9 – Gender in the Criminal Justice System. Retrieved from https://www.unodc.org/e4j/en/crime-prevention-criminal-justice/module-9/index.html.

Walmsley, Roy (2017). World Female Imprisonment List . London: ICPR and Birkbeck University of London.

Wesely, J. K., & Dewey, S. C. (2018). Confronting gendered pathways to incarceration: Considerations for reentry programming. Social Justice, 45(1), 57-82. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26677646.

Downloads

Published

2022-03-22

How to Cite

George, K. ., Sibanyoni, E. ., & Mofokeng, J. (2022). Fetching water with a leaking container: Female offenders’ rehabilitation programme limitation, South Africa. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478), 11(2), 433–446. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v11i2.1691

Issue

Section

Legal Issues in Social Science