The impact of three critical success factors on online learning at the higher institutions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v11i5.1877Keywords:
Online learning, E-learning, Family wise error, Critical success factors, Learning Theories, Holm BonferroniAbstract
Globalization and rapid technological change have made knowledge a critical determinant of competitiveness in the world’s economy. Online education has been auspicious and adjustable even to students with tight schedules. However several critical success factors need to be improved in order to enhance the effective learner experience. This paper is aimed at uncovering the impact of three critical success factors namely; instructional design, learner interaction and learner technology adaptation on learner experience. Hence, the discretions of 300 students were diagnosed using the Likert scale questionnaire ranging from strongly agree to strongly disagree. The Holm Bonferroni method from R- package version 0.88 (2021 edition), was engaged to reduce the family-wise error (FWER) associated with multiple hypothesis comparison. It was observed that at a 5% level of significance, the alternative hypothesis was acceptable in favor of the null hypothesis and the conclusion was that instructional design, learner interaction, and technology adaptation, have a direct impact on the learning experience of the learner. The adopted models for the three critical success factors were validated by the Fornell and Larcker's (1981) convergent reliability test and tolerable with high composite reliability of 0.71. In accordance with the adopted model, a well instructional design is suggested for compliance.
Downloads
References
Adam, N. L., Alzahri, F. B., Soh, S. C., Bakar, N. A., & Kamal, N. A. M. (2017). Self-regulated learning and online learning: a systematic review. Proceedings of the International Visual Informatics Conference, 143-154. Springer, Cham.
Ally, M. (2004). Foundations of educational theory for online learning In T. Anderson, & F. Elloumi, F. (Eds.), Theory and practice of online learning. Creative Commons, Athabasca University.
Ally, M. (2008). The impact of technology on education. In S. Hirtz (Ed.), Education for a digital world: Advice, guidelines, and effective practice from around the globe (pp. 57-66). Commonwealth of Learning.
Almeshal, T. (2015). Social Media Adoption in Learning and Teaching by Higher Education Faculty. 9th International Technology, Education and Development Conference (pp. 1- 10). Madrid: Higher Education Faculty.
Anderson, T. (2003). Modes of interaction in distance education: Recent developments and research questions. In M. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of Distance Education (pp. 129-144). Erlbaum & Associates.
Anderson, T. (2008). The theory and practice of online learning. Athabasca University Press.
Broadbent, J. (2017). Comparing online and blended learner’s self-regulated learning strategies and academic performance. The Internet and Higher Education, 33, 24-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.01.004
Butler, T. J., & Pinto-Zipp, G. (2005). Students’ learning styles and their preferences for online instructional methods. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 34(2), 199-221. https://doi.org/10.2190/8ud2-bhfu-4pxv-7alw
Christensen, C. M., Horn, M. B., Caldera, L., & Soares, L. (2011). Disrupting college: How disruptive innovation can deliver quality and affordability to postsecondary education. The Center for American Progress [Blog post].
Cirocki, A., & Widodo, H. P. (2019). Reflective practice in English language teaching in Indonesia: Shared practices from two teacher educators. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 7(3), 15-35.
Dumlao, R. P., & Pinatacan, J. R. (2019). From practice to writing: Using reflective journal instruction in enhancing pre-service teachers’ professional development. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 459–478. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12430a
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing, 18(3), 382-388.
Harasim, L. M., Hiltz, S. R., Teles, L., & Turoff, M. (1995). Learning networks: A field guide to teaching and learning online. MIT press.
Hegarty, B. (2011). A framework to guide professional learning and reflective practice [Doctoral dissertation]. Faculty of Education, University of Wollongong.
Jiang, M., & Ting, E. (1998). Course Design, Instruction, and Students’ Online Behaviors: A Study of Instructional Variables and Students’ Perceptions of Online Learning. Presented at American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting 1998. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/85035/
Karuppan, C. M. (2001). Web?based teaching materials: a user’s profile. Internet Research, 11(2), 138-149. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240110695106
Kearsley, G. (2000). Online Education: Learning and Teaching in Cyberspace. Wadsworth.
Kesan, C., & Kaya, D. (2007). Determination of Misconceptions that are Encountered by Teacher Candidates and Solution Propositions for Relieving of These Misconceptions. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology – TOJET, 6(3). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED500057.pdf
Keskin, S. & Yurdugül, H. (2019). Factors Affecting Students’ Preferences for Online and Blended Learning: Motivational vs. Cognitive. European Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 22(2), 72-86. https://doi.org/10.2478/eurodl-2019-0011
Khan, B. H. (Ed.). (1997). Web-based instruction. Educational Technology.
Kolb. D. A. and Fry, R. (1975). Toward an applied theory of experiential learning. In C. Cooper (Ed.), Theories of Group Process (pp. 33-56). John Wiley.
Kovacks, L., & Corrie, S. (2017). Building reflective capability to enhance coaching practice. The Coaching Psychologist, 13(1), 4–14.
Laurillard, D. (1997). Rethinking university teaching: A framework for the effective use of educational technology. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-1315(94)90009-4
Laurillard, D. (2004). E-learning in higher education. Changing higher education. The Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 2(3), 7.
Lubbe, W., & Botha, C. S. (2020). The dimensions of reflective practice: a teacher educator’s and nurse educator’s perspective. Reflective Practice, 21(3), 287-300. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2020.1738369
Macdonald, J., & Twining, P. (2002). Assessing activity–based learning for a networked course. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(5), 603-618.
Mantell, A., & Scragg, T. (2019). Reflective practice in social work (5th Ed.) Learning Matters. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529705676
Meyer, K. A. (2002). Quality in Distance Education: Focus on On-Line Learning. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report. Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series
Miller, J. M. (2020). Reflective practice and health sciences librarians: Engagement, benefits, and barriers. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 108(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2020.777
Moore, M. (1989). Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1- 6.
Murire, O. Cilliers, L. (2016). Social media adoption among lecturers at a traditional university in Eastern Cape Province of South Africa. South African Journal of Management, 19 (1), 1- 6. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v19i1.834
Naicker, K., & Van Rensburg, G. H. (2018). Facilitation of reflective learning in nursing: Reflective teaching practices of educators. Africa Journal of Nursing and Midwifery, 20(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.25159/2520-5293/3386
Nistor, V. M., & Samarasinghe, D. A. S. (2019). Academic staff induction and assessment on implementing experiential learning and reflective practice. IAFOR Journal of Education, 7(2), 149–167. https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.7.2.08
NMC Horizon Report (2017). NMC Horizon Report: 2017 Higher Education Edition. Retrieved from http://cdn.nmc.org/media/2017-nmc-horizon-report-he-EN.pdf
Peltier, J. W., Drago, W., & Schibrowsky, J. A. (2003). Virtual communities and the assessment of online marketing education. Journal of Marketing Education, 25(3), 260-276.
Postareff, L., & Lindblom-Ylanne, S. (2008). Variation in Teachers’ Descriptions of Teaching: Broadening the Understanding of Teaching in Higher Education. Learning and Instruction, 18, 109-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.01.008
Pries, E. (2019). The reflective practice writing bicycle: A reflective analysis tool for engaged learning. Religious Studies and Theology, 38(1–2), 125–140. https://doi.org/10.1558/rsth.38261
Rovai, A. P., & Jordan, H. (2004). Blended learning and sense of community: A comparative analysis with traditional and fully online graduate courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v5i2.192
Tlali, T. (2019). Developing professionalism through reflective practice among pre-service teachers at the National University of Lesotho. Africa Education Review, 16(3), 117. https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2017.1390396
Tsai, C. C. (2005). Preferences toward Internet-based learning environments: High school students’ perspectives for science learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 8(2), 203-213.
Valtonen, T., Kukkonen, J., Dillon, P., & Väisänen, P. (2009). Finnish high school students’ readiness to adopt online learning: Questioning the assumptions. Computers & Education, 53(3), 742-748.
Wojciechowski, A., & Palmer, L. B. (2005). Individual student characteristics: Can any be predictors of success in online classes. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 8(2), 13.
Yalman, M., Gönen, S., & Ba?aran, B. (2013). High School Senior Students’ Use of Internet Technologies And The?r Attitudes Towards The Internet. Academic Sight, 39(18). International Refereed Online Journal of Social Sciences.
Yang, F. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2008). Investigating university student preferences and beliefs about learning in the web-based context. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1284-1303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.12.009
Zimmerman, B. (1994). Dimensions of academic self-regulation: A conceptual framework for education. In D.H. Schunk, & B.J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of Learning and Performance Issues and Educational Applications (pp. 3-21). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Simon Adjei Tachie, Boahemaa Brenya, Kofi F. Owusu

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
For all articles published in IJRBS, copyright is retained by the authors. Articles are licensed under an open access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download and read the paper for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted provided that the original published version is cited. These conditions allow for maximum use and exposure of the work, while ensuring that the authors receive proper credit.