The mediating role of explicit knowledge sharing in the relationship between empowering leadership and proactive work behavior in defense industry enterprises
Keywords:Empowering Leadership, Proactive Work Behavior, Explicit Knowledge Sharing
This paper aims to investigate the mediating role of explicit knowledge sharing in the relationship between empowering leadership and proactive work behavior in defense industry enterprises. The sample of this study consists of defense industry enterprises operating within the borders of Turkey. A total of 305 survey data were collected from these enterprises using the random sampling method, and 5 survey data among them were eliminated because of missing information, and analyzes were made with a total of 301 survey data. Structural equation modeling was used to test the research model and hypotheses. According to the analysis results of the study, empowering leadership has a positive effect on proactive work behavior and explicit knowledge sharing. In addition, it has been understood that open information sharing has a positive effect on proactive work behavior. Finally, it has been revealed that explicit knowledge sharing has a mediating role in the relationship between empowering leadership and proactive work behavior.
Akram, T., Shen, L., Haider, M. J. and Hussain, S. T. (2020). The impact of organizational justice on employee innovative work behavior: Mediating role of knowledge sharing. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. 5(2), 117-129.
Al-husseini, S., Beltagi, I. and Moizer, J. (2019). Transformational leadership and innovation: the mediating role of knowledge sharing amongst higher education faculty. International Journal of Leadership in Education. 24, 1-24.
Arnold, J. A., Arad, S., Rhoades, J. A., & Drasgow, F. (2000). The empowering leadership questionnaire: The construction and validation of a new scale for measuring leader behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(3), 249–269.
Ashford, S. J. and Black, J. S. (1996). Proactivity during organizational entry: The role of desire for control. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(2), 199-214.
Ashford, S. J. and Cummings, L. L. (1985). Proactive feedback seeking: The ?nstrumental use of the information environment. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 58, 67–79.
Balta?, A. (2002). Ekip çal??mas? and liderlik. (Geli?tirilmi? 6.bas?m). ?stanbul: Remzi Kitabevi.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
Baron R., & Kenny, D. (1986). The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychology Research, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1176.
Bergeron, D. M., Schroeder, T. D.,& Martínez, M. (2014). Proactive personality at work: seeing more to do and doing more. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(1), 71-86.
Bindl, U. K., & Parker, S. K. (2010). Proactive work behavior: Forward-thinking and change-oriented action in organizations. Zedeck, S (ed.). APA Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (2th ed.). Washington: American Psychological Association. 567–598.
Bloodgood, J. M. and Salisbury, W. D. (2001) Understanding the influence of organizational change strategies on information technology and knowledge management strategies. Decision Support Systems, 31(1), 55-69.
Cai, D., Cai, Y., Sun, Y. and Ma, J. (2018). Linking empowering leadership and employee work engagement: The effects of person-job fit, person-group fit, and proactive personality. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1304.
Chen, Z., Zhang, X. and Vogel, D. (2011). Exploring the underlying process between conflict and knowledge sharing: A work-engagement perspective, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(5): 1005-1033.
Choi, B., & Lee, H. (2003). An empirical investigation of knowledge management styles and their effect on corporate performance. Information & Management, 40, 403-417.
Coakes, E. (2006). Storing and sharing knowledge: supporting the management of knowledge made explicit in transnational organisations. The Learning Organization, 13(6), 579-593.
Conger, J. A. (1989). Leadership: The art of empowering others. Academy of Management Executive 3, 17-24.
Crant, J. (2000). Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 26(3), 435– 462.
Çelebi, S. (2014). Kamu ??letmelerinde De?i?im Yönetimi Modeli: ?ETT Uygulamas? (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Y?ld?z Teknik Üniversitesi, ?stanbul.
Dilekli, Y., & Tezci, E. (2019). Adaptation of teachers’ Teaching Thinking Practices Scale into English. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(4), 943-953.
Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 39-50.
Frese, M., Garst, H. and Fay, D. (2007). Making things happen: reciprocal relationships between work characteristics and personal initiative in a four- 55 wave longitudinal structural equation model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 1084–1112.
Grant, A.M., Parker, S. and Collins, C. (2009). Getting credit for proactive behavior: supervisor reactions depend on what you value and how you feel. Personnel Psychology, 62, 31-55.
Griffin, M. A., Parker, S. K., & Mason, C. M. (2010). Leader vision and the development of adaptive and proactive performance: A longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 174–182.
Hair, J. F., William C. B., Barry J. B., & Rolph E. A. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis. (7th ed). Pearson Education Limited.
Hayes, A. F. (2009). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Publications.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
?mamo?lu, E. B. (2019). Güçlendirici liderlik ile yenilikçi i? davran??? aras?ndaki ili?kide alg?lanan örgütsel destek and bilgi payla??m? davran???n?n arac? rolü: bili?im sektöründe bir çal??ma (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Y?ld?z Teknik Üniversitesi, ?stanbul.
Jia J., Yan J., Jahanshahi A.A., Lin W. and Bhattacharjee A. (2019). What makes employees more proactive? Roles of job embeddedness, the perceived strength of the HRM system and empowering leadership. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 58, 1–21.
Karlsen, T., Silseth, P. R., Benito, G. R. G. and Welch, L. S. (2003). Knowledge, internationalization of the firm, and inward–outward connections. Industrial Marketing Management, 32(5), 385-396.
Konczak, L. J., Stelly, D. J. & Trusty, M. L. (2000). Defining and measuring empowering leader behaviors: development of an upward feedback instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 301-313.
Kovianto and Syahrizal. (2020). Workplace spirituality and empowering leadership in improving proactive behavior: the role of job engagement as mediator. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, 152, 843-850.
Lee, J., Lee, H. and Park, J. G. (2014). Exploring the impact of empowering leadership on knowledge sharing, absorptive capacity and team performance in IT service. Information Technology & People, 27(3), 366–386.
Lee, Y.-H., Lu, T.-E., Yang, C. C., & Chang, G. (2019). A multilevel approach on empowering leadership and safety behavior in the medical industry: The mediating effects of knowledge sharing and safety climate. Safety Science, 117, 1–9.
Li, H., Jin, H. and Chen, T. (2020). Linking proactive personality to creative performance: The role of job crafting and high?involvement work systems. Journal of Creative Behavior, 54(1), 196-210.
Li, N., Liand, J. and Crant, M. J. (2010). The role of proactive personality in job satisfaction and organizational citizienship behavior: a relational perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(2), 395-404.
Lomax, R. G., & Schumacker, R. E. (2012). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. New York: Routledge Academic.
Martin, S. L., Liao, H. and Campbell, E. M. (2013). Directive versus empowering leadership: A field experiment comparing impacts on task proficiency and proactivity. Academy of Management Journal, 56(5), 1372–1395.
Matic, D., Cabrilo, S., Grubi?-Neši?, L. and Mili?, B. (2017). Investigating the impact of organizational climate, motivational drivers, and empowering leadership on knowledge sharing. Knowledge Management Research & Practice. 15(3), 431-446.
Morrison, E. & Phelps, C. (1999). Taking charge at work: extrarole efforts to initiate workplace change. The Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 403-419.
Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1). 14-37.
Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Pallant, J. (2013). SPSS survival manual. UK: McGraw-Hill Education.
Parker, S. K. (1998). Enhancing role breadth self-efficacy: the roles of job enrichment and other organizational interventions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(6), 835-852.
Parker, S. K. and Collins C. G. (2010). Taking stock: integrating and differentiating multiple proactive behaviors. Journal of Management, 36(3), 633-662.
Parker, S. K., Williams, H. M. and Turner, N. (2006). Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology. 91(3), 636–652.
Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior research methods, 40(3), 879-891.
Rosseel, Y. (2019). lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1-36.
Sharma, P. N. and Kirkman, B. L. (2015). Leveraging leaders: A literature review and future lines of inquiry for empowering leadership research. Group & Organization Management, 40(2), 193-237.
Song, C., Park, K. R. and Kang, S.-W. (2015). Servant leadership and team performance: The mediating role of knowledge-sharing climate. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 43(10), 1749–1760.
Srivastava, A., Bartol, K. M. and Locke, E. A. (2006). Empowering leadership in management teams: effects on knowledge sharing, efficacy, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49(6), 1239–1251.
?encan, H. (2005). Güvenilirlik and geçerlilik. Ankara: Seçkin Yay?nc?l?k.
Thomas, J., Whitman, D. and Viswesvaran, C. (2010). Employee proactivity in organizations: A comparative meta-analysis of emergent proactive constructs. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 275-300.
Tian, X., Peng, X. and Peng, X. (2021). Influence of Prosocial Motivation on Employee Creativity: The Moderating Role of Regulatory Focus and the Mediating Role of Knowledge Sharing. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1-17.
Vecchio, R.P., Justin, J.E. and Pearce, C. L. (2010). Empowering leadership: An examination of mediating mechanisms within a hierarchical structure, The Leadership Quarterly, 21.
Wang C-J, Yang I-H. (2021). Why and how does empowering leadership promote proactive work behavior? An examination with a serial mediation model among hotel employees. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 18(5), 2386.
Wang, Z. and Wang, N. (2012). Knowledge sharing, innovation and firm performance. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(10), 8899–8908.
Xue, Y., Bradley, J. and Liang, H. (2011). Team climate, empowering leadership, and knowledge sharing, Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(2), 299-312.
Yin, K., Xing, L., Li, C. and Guo, Y. (2017). Are empowered employees more proactive? The contingency of how they evaluate their leader. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1802.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2022 Cemal Zehir, Samet Celebi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
For all articles published in IJRBS, copyright is retained by the authors. Articles are licensed under an open access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download and read the paper for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted provided that the original published version is cited. These conditions allow for maximum use and exposure of the work, while ensuring that the authors receive proper credit.