The Meaningful practice creating shared value as a contribute to sustainable development goals

Case study at Pt Pupuk Kaltim

Authors

  • Alan smith purba brawijaya university
  • Eko Ganis Sukoharsono
  • Bambang Hariadi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v9i7.934

Keywords:

Public Image, Sustainable Development Goal, Shared Value

Abstract

This study aims to reveal the meaning of the Creating Shared Value (CSV) practice as a contribution to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) at PT Pupuk Kaltim (PKT) with a case study approach. CSV with Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is a concept that does have the same umbrella, which is a charity to the community and contributes to SDG's but in practice these two concepts are different. The difference lies in the value generated. CSV provides significant value to the company in the form of profit in the form of reducing the company's activity costs and is related to the company's core business products so that the value that arises to the company is not only a good view (image) by the community. When implementing the CSR concept, the company focuses on carrying out charity actions to the community so that it creates a good corporate image by the community and does not focus on the value that is generated profitably to the company. PKT has implemented CSV practice with the floating net cages (FNC) program. The KJA program carries out activities with the grouper and lobster cultivation program and PKT's business activity is in the field of fertilizers. FNC has provided a good view from the community for PKT but the FNC that is claimed by PKT as an FNC Program is not yet a concept of CSV. In practice, FNC is more appropriate to say CSR because it has not provided profit value for PKT.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anggraini, Fr dan Reni Retno. 2006. Pengungkapan Informasi Sosial dan Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Pengungkapan Informasi Sosial dalam Laporan Keuangan Tahunan (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan-Perusahaan yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia). Symposium National Accounting IX Padang.

Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Brammal, S. (2014). CSR or social enterprise: which has more social impact? | Guardian sustainable business | The Guardian. Retrieved November 29, 2020, from https://www.theguardian.com/social-enterprise-network/2014/mar/25/corporate-social-responsibility-better-social-business

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

McEvoy, G. M., & Buller, P. F. (2013). Human resource management practices in mid?sized enterprises. American Journal of Business.

Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business horizons, 34(4), 39-48.

Daood, A., & Menghwar, P. S. (2017, September). Understanding “Creating Shared Value”. In 10th Annual Conference of the EuroMed Academy of Business.

Dragan, ?., Dejan, ?., Sr?an, B., & Cariša, B. (2014). Socially responsible business and competitiveness in Serbia attitudes of students. ??????????? ?????????: ????????, ?????????, ???????????, (10).

Drummond-Dunn, D. (2016). Innovation and Creating Shared Value: The Highly Effective Habits of Innovative Organizations. Journal of Creating Value, 2(1), 40-55.

Jefkins, Frank. 2003. Public Relations. Edisi Kelima Direvisi Oleh Daniel Yadin. Penerbit Erlangga: Jakarta.

Ngoyo, M. F. (2018). Mengawal sustainable development goals (SDGs); meluruskan orientasi pembangunan yang berkeadilan. Sosioreligius, 1(1).

Hartman, L. P., Mead, J., Werhane, P. H., & Christmas, D. (2011). “Connecting the World Through Games”: Creating Shared Value in the Case of Zynga’s Corporate Social Strategy. Journal of Business Ethics Education, 8(1), 199-230.

Lapi?a, I., Borkus, I., & Stari?eca, O. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and creating shared value: Case of Latvia. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 6, 1605-1611.

Yulia Kusuma Wardani, Y. (2018). Implementasi Konsep Creating Shared Value (Csv) Sebagai Program Corporate Social Responsibility (Csr) Dalam Peningkatan Kesejahteraan Stakeholder (Studi pada PT. Nestle Indonesia Panjang Factory). Pactum Law Journal, 1(03), 258-271.

Fraser, J. (2019). Creating shared value as a business strategy for mining to advance the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. The Extractive Industries and Society, 6(3), 788-791.

Elkington, J., & Rowlands, I. H. (1999). Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st-century business. Alternatives Journal, 25(4), 42.

Kim, R. C. (2018). Can creating shared value (CSV) and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (UN SDGs) collaborate for a better world? Insights from East Asia. Sustainability, 10(11), 4128.

Kramer, M. R., & Pfitzer, M. W. (2016). The ecosystem of shared value. Harvard Business Review, 94(10), 80-89.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256294652_Naturalistic_Inquiry

Lopez, B., & Monfort, A. (2017). Creating shared value in the context of sustainability: The communication strategy of MNCs. Corporate Governance and Strategic Decision Making, 119-135.

Massa, L., Farneti, F., & Scappini, B. (2015). Developing a sustainability report in a small to medium enterprise: process and consequences. Meditari Accountancy Research.

Rahayu, M. P. (2017). Respon Organisasional Terhadap Implementasi Remunerasi Berbasis Kinerja Dalam Perspektif Resource Dependence Theory Dan New Institutional Sociology (Studi Kasus Pada Badan Layanan Umum Poltekkes Kemenkes Malang) (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Brawijaya).

Oktaviani, R. M. (2011). Fenomenologi implementasi corporate social responsibility sebagai realita strategi perusahaan: studi kasus pada PT APAC INTI CORPORA bawen semarang. Jurnal: dinamika keuangan dan perbankan, 3.

Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2002). The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard business review, 80(12), 56-68.

Pradipta, D. H., & Purwaningsih, A. (2013). Pengaruh Luas Pengungkapan Tanggung Jawab Sosial dan Lingkungan Perusahaan terhadap Earning Response Coefficient (ERC), dengan Ukuran Perusahaan dan Leverage Sebagai Variabel Kontrol. Universitas Atma Jaya.

Pupuk Kaltim, Sustainability Report (SR). (2018). Enhancing Value through Sustainable Innovation. The Indonesian fertiliser industry

Rixen, M., Böbel, I., Chailan, C., & Carlo, M. (2013). Creating Shared Value on a Global Scale: Possibilities for the United Nations’ Engagement. Journal of Competitiveness & Strategy, 3, 2-15.

Roulston, K. (2001). Data analysis and ‘theorizing as ideology’. Qualitative research, 1(3), 279-302.

Chamidah, S., & Yulianti P, R. R. (2009). Kajian Kritis: Corporate Social Responsibility (Csr) Dan Strategi Mencapai Keunggulan Kompetitif. Dinamika Ekonomi, 2(2).

Solihin, I. (2008). Corporate Social Responsibility from Charity to Sustainability, Jakarta: PT. Riau Andalan Pulp and Paper.

Sukoharsono, E. G. (2019). Sustaining A Sustainability Report by Modifying Triple Bottom Line To Pentaple Bottom Line: An Imaginary Research Dialogue. The International Journal of Accounting and Business Society, 27(1), 119-127.

Sukoharsono, E. G. (2010). Metamorfosis Akuntansi Sosial dan Lingkungan: Mengkonstruksi Akuntansi Sustainabilitas Berdimensi Spiritualitas. Pidato Pengukuhan Guru Besar FE Univ. Brawijaya.

Konsumen, S. O. P., & Pemasaran, K. (2001). cetakan I Penerbit PT. Remaja Rosdakarya, Bandung.

Wibisono, Y. (2007). Membedah konsep & aplikasi CSR: corporate social responsibility. Fascho Pub.

Wójcik,P. (2016). How creating shared value differs from corporate social responsibility. Journal of Management and Business AdministrationCentral Europe, 24(2),32–55.

Yin, R. K. (2002). Studi kasus: desain dan metode. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-12

How to Cite

purba, A. smith, Sukoharsono, E. G., & Hariadi, B. (2020). The Meaningful practice creating shared value as a contribute to sustainable development goals: Case study at Pt Pupuk Kaltim. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478), 9(7), 222–232. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v9i7.934

Issue

Section

Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities & Social Sciences