Macroeconomic Implications of Changes in Social Security Rules

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v6i1.657

Keywords:

Social Security Reform, Retirement Age, Replacement Rate, Macroeconomics

Abstract

The Turkish social insurance system has been feverishly debated for years, particularly through its burden on the economy. The most recent reform is an attempt to neutralize the deterioration within the social security system and its effects on the economy. After the recent reform, ‘the way that retirement benefits are calculated’ is changed unfavorably for workers and the minimum age for retirement is increased. In particular, for an agent with 25 years of social security tax payments, the replacement rate is down from 65 percent to 50 percent. On the other hand, retirement age is up from 60 to 65. The aim of this paper is to investigate the macroeconomic effects of these changes using an OLG model. The author’s findings indicate that labor supply, output and capital stock increase when changes above are applied to the benchmark economy calibrated to the Turkish economy data in 2005. A critical change with the current reform is that the marginal benefit of working has become uniform over ages. In a simulation exercise, the marginal retirement benefit in the benchmark economy is changed to be uniform over ages while keeping the size of social security system unchanged. As a result, the benefit of retiring at a later period increases. However, uniform distribution of the marginal benefits itself decreases both the capital stock and output of the economy. Increasing the retirement age has positive effects on the economy since agents obtain retirement benefits for fewer years and at an older age.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akbulak, S., & Akbulak, Y. (2004). Resource Problem of Social Security Institutions and Solution Proposals (in Turkish), Maliye Hesap Uzmanlar? Vakf? Yay?nlar?.

Alper, Y., Imrohoroglu, S., & Sayan, S. (2014). Reform in the Turkish Pension System: The Present Situation and Alternative Strategies Ahead (in Turkish), TUSIAD, 184.

Auerbach, A. and Kotlikoff, L. (1987). Dynamic Fiscal Policy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Baker, M., Gruber, J., & Milligan, K. (2003). The Retirement Incentive Effects of Canada's Income Security Programs. The Canadian Journal of Economics / Revue canadienned' Economique, Vol. 36, No. 2, (May, 2003), pp. 261-290.

Blundell, R. & MaCurdy, T. E. (1999). Labor Supply: a Review of Alternative Approaches. In Handbook of Labor Economics, vol. 3A, ed. O. A. Ashenfelter and D. Card. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1599-1695.

Eldred, G. W. (1981). Social Security: A Conceptual Alternative. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, Vol. 48, No. 2, (Jun., 1981), pp. 220-234

Elder, E., & Holland, L. (2002). Implications of Social Security Reform on Interest Rates: Theory and Evidence. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, Vol. 69, No. 2 (Jun., 2002), pp. 225-244

Ferreira, S. G. (2005). Pension Reform in Brazil: Transitional Issues in a Model with Endogenous Labor Supply. IBMEC Economics Discussion Paper 2005-02.

Glomm, G., Jung, J., & Tran, C. (2006). Macroeconomic Implications of Early Retirement in the Public Sector: The Case of Brazil, Indiana University-Bloomington.

Gruber, J. (1999). Social Security and Retirement in Canada. In Social Security and Retirement Around the World, ed. J. Gruber and D. Wise. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Haveman, R., Holden, K., Wilson, K., & Wolfe, B. (2003). Social Security, Age of Retirement, and Economic Well-Being: Inter temporal and Demographic Patterns among Retired-Worker Beneficiaries. Demography, Vol. 40, No. 2, (May, 2003), pp. 369-394

Huggett, M., & Ventura, G. (1999). On the Distributional Effects of Social Security Reform. Review of Economic Dynamics, 2, 498-531.

Imrohoroglu, A., Imrohoroglu, S., & Joines, D. H. (1995). A Life Cycle Analysis of Social Security. Economic Theory, 6: 83-114.

Imrohoroglu, S., De Nardi, M., & Sargent, T., J. (2001). Saving and Pension Reform in General Equilibrium Models. Oxford Papers on Economic Policy, Vol. 17, No. 1.

Kaygusuz, R. (2015). Social security and two-earner households. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 59, 163-178.

Kydland, F., & Prescott, E. (1982). Time to Build and Aggregate Fluctuations. Econometrica, 50:1345:70.

MaCurdy, T. E. (1981). An Empirical Model of Labor Supply in a Life-Cycle Setting. Journal of Political Economy, vol. 89, no. 6, 1059-1085.

Maliye Bakanl??? - Ministry of Finance (2006), Genel Faaliyet Raporu (2006), retrieved from: www.maliye.gov.tr.

OECD, Country Statistical Perspective, retrieved from: www.oecd.ogr/economics.

Ozbek, N. (2006). Social Security and Social Policy in the Turkish Republic (in Turkish), Istanbul: Tarih Vakf?.

Sayan, S., & Kiraci, A. (2001). Parametric Pension Reform with Higher Retirement Ages: A Computational Investigation of Alternatives for a Pay-As-You-Go Based Pension System. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Vol. 25, No. 6-7, pp. 951-966.

Sayan, S. (2002). Turning Potential Retirees into Workers: Pension Reform Act of 1999 and Beyond in Turkey. Middle East Business and Economic Review, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 54-70.

Teksoz, T., & S. Sayan (2002). Simulation of Benefits and Risks after the Planned Privatisation of Pension System in Turkey: Is The Expected Boost to Financial Markets Feasible? Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Vol. 38, No. 5, pp. 23-45.

Downloads

Published

2017-01-20 — Updated on 2021-09-26

Versions

How to Cite

Bagis, B. (2021). Macroeconomic Implications of Changes in Social Security Rules. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478), 6(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v6i1.657 (Original work published January 20, 2017)

Issue

Section

Articles