The law politics of bankruptcy decision execution against debtor's assets abroad
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v13i6.3756Keywords:
Law Politics, Debtor Assets, Sovereignty, Bankruptcy Law, International Bankruptcy, Model LawAbstract
The purpose of this study is to examine and analyze law politics related to the execution of bankruptcy decisions against debtor assets abroad. The research method used is normative legal research with a qualitative descriptive analysis method approach, based on comparative law, with prescriptive analytical specifications. The research findings conclude that sovereignty is interpreted as the responsibility to improve and protect all national and international community interests, manifested in the form of the state's ability to interact and establish relations with countries in the world, as well as cooperate and coordinate bilaterally, multilaterally and in international organizations. The provisions on international bankruptcy in Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations or Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (Bankruptcy Law) are similar to the Dutch Bankruptcy Law, there are no comprehensive regulations related to international bankruptcy. To ensure legal certainty, a legal policy is needed in the form of changes and updates to the Bankruptcy Law by adding articles to apply the principles of international bankruptcy in the Model Law, namely the Principle of Access, the Principle of Recognition, the Principle of Assistance and the Principle of Cooperation and Coordination, as applied in the US Bankruptcy Code Chapter 15. Article 299 of the Bankruptcy Law also needs to be amended so that the procedural law applied is the special procedural law for international bankruptcy.
Downloads
References
Adewale, Y., & Fajar, M. (2017). Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif & Empiris. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Amalia, J. (2019). Urgensi implementasi UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency di Indonesia: Studi komparasi hukum kepailitan lintas batas Indonesia dan Singapura. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune, 2(2), 162-172. https://doi.org/10.30996/jhbbc.v2i2.2499 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30996/jhbbc.v2i2.2499
Anisairufah, & Yahya, A. (2023). The application of cross-border insolvency bankruptcy in the execution of debtor's assets in Indonesia: A comprehensive analysis. Student Journal of International Law, Faculty of Law, Syiah Kuala University, 3(1), 177-193. e-ISSN: 2807-8497.
Arrilia, D. (2022). Pengaruh sistem hukum common law terhadap kontrak bisnis modern di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan (JISIP), Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Surabaya, 5(3), 660-666. ISSN 2598-9944(Print); 2656-6753(Online). DOI: https://doi.org/10.58258/jisip.v5i3.2245
Britannica. (2024). Sovereignty. The Editors of Encyclopaedia. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/topic/sovereignty
Christmas, S. K., & Purwanti, E. (2020). Perkembangan sistem pemerintahan dan konsep kedaulatan pasca Revolusi Perancis terhadap hukum internasional. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro, 2(2), 222-235. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v2i2.222-235 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v2i2.222-235
Congressional Research Service. (2022). Bankruptcy Basics: A Primer. Retrieved from https://crsreports.congress.govR45137
Daud, B. S., & Awaluddin. (2021). Aspek religius dalam pembaharuan hukum pidana melalui politik hukum nasional. Journal of Judicial Review, 23(1), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.37253/jjr.v23i1.4334 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37253/jjr.v23i1.4334
De Rechtspraak. (2015). International Insolvency. Retrieved from https://www.rechtspraak.nl/English/Pages/International-Insolvency.aspx#cb01f363-fd8e-4073-8fe3-1113887a8b5a5a3194d6-d64d-45e7-929b-bc40836492a23
Dewanto, W. A., & Lisanawati, G. (2023). Analisis yuridis kegiatan spionase melalui fasilitas diplomatik dan konsular. Jurnal Perspektif Hukum, Universitas Hang Tuah, 23(2), 223–238. https://doi.org/10.30649/ph.v23i2.240 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30649/ph.v23i2.240
Fajar, M., & Achmad, Y. (2010). Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Empiris & Normatif. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Fitriah, M. (2024). Eksekusi boedel pailit yang berada di luar wilayah hukum Indonesia. Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, 8(2), 1338-1347. https://doi.org/10.31316/jk.v8i1.1559
Freeman, M. (2003). Current Legal Problems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ganindhanadhira, R., & Indira, P. (2020). Kewenangan kurator dalam eksekusi aset debitor pada kepailitan lintas batas negara. Jurnal Arena Hukum, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya, 13(2), 329–347. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2020.01302.8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2020.01302.8
Gross, M. (1991). Foreign creditor’s rights: Recognition of foreign bankruptcy adjudications in the United States and the Republic of Singapore. Pennsylvania Journal of International Business Law, 12(1), 125-152. Retrieved from https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1563&context=jil
Hafizhah, A., Leviza, J., & Mulhadi. (2024). Potret asas legalitas dalam hukum pidana: Common law vs civil law. IPMHI Law Journal, Ikatan Penulis Mahasiswa Hukum Indonesia Law Journal, Universitas Negeri Semarang, 4(1), 38-47. https://doi.org/10.15294/ipmhi.v4i1.76875 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/ipmhi.v4i1.76875
Hakim, D. A., & Havez, M. (2020). Politik hukum perlindungan pekerja migran Indonesia dalam perspektif fikih siyasah dusturiyah. Tanjungpura Law Journal, Universitas Tanjung Pura, 4(2), 95-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.26418/tlj.v4i2.41913 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26418/tlj.v4i2.41913
Hakim, L., & Saputra, N. D. (2023). Politik hukum insolvency test dalam pembaharuan hukum kepailitan di Indonesia. Madani: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin, 1(8), 132-141. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8360194
Hamzah, H. (2019). Politik hukum sumber daya alam. Jurisprudentie, Universitas Mulawarman, 6(2), 276-290. https://doi.org/10.24252/jurisprudentie.v6i2.11079 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24252/jurisprudentie.v6i2.11079
Haq, M. H. M. (2023). Model law on cross border insolvency dalam ratifikasi pengaturan hukum kepailitan lintas batas di Indonesia. Jurnal Negara dan Keadilan, Universitas Islam Malang, 12(2), 123-142. https://doi.org/10.33474/negkea.v12i2.20034
Heatubun, A. N., Anwar, A., & Wattimena, J. A. Y. (2024). Pengaturan hukum laut internasional terhadap tabrakan kapal yang disengajakan. TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, 3(11), 1055-1068. https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v3i11.2098 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v3i11.2098
International Principle of Law Trans-Lex.org. (N/A). Lex specialis-principle. Retrieved from https://www.trans-lex.org/910000/_/lex-specialis-principle/
Irwansyah. (2022). Penelitian hukum, pilihan metode & praktik penulisan artikel. Yogyakarta: Mirra Buana Media.
Islamiyati, D. H. (2019). Analisis politik hukum dan implementasinya. Law, Development & Justice Review, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro, 2(1), 104-117. https://doi.org/10.14710/ldjr.v2i1.5139 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/ldjr.v2i1.5139
Iswara, I. G. N. B. M., Nahak, S., & Mahendrawati, N. L. M. (2019). Kepastian hukum pengenaan pajak penghasilan transaksi jual beli tanah dan/atau bangunan. Jurnal Hukum Prasada, Universitas Warmadewa, 6(1), 42-51. https://doi.org/10.22225/jhp.6.1.2019.42-51
Julyano, M., & Sulistyawan, A. Y. (2019). Pemahaman terhadap asas kepastian hukum melalui konstruksi penalaran positivisme hukum. Jurnal Crepido, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro, 1(1), 13-22. https://doi.org/10.14710/crepido.1.1.13-22 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/crepido.1.1.13-22
Keay, A., & Walton, P. (2011). Insolvency law. London: Jordans.
Kelsen, H. (2007). Teori hukum murni, dasar-dasar ilmu hukum normatif (Cetakan II, Diterjemahkan dari buku Hans Kelsen, Pure Theory of Law). Bandung: Penerbit Nusamedia dan Penerbit Nuansa.
Khairunnissa, S. (2024). Pengaturan kepailitan lintas batas negara dalam perbandingan hukum perdata internasional antara Indonesia dan Malaysia. Recht Studiosum Law Review, Universitas Sumatera Utara, 3(1), 105-111. https://doi.org/10.32734/rslr.v3i1.16413 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32734/rslr.v3i1.16413
Klappstein, V. (2015). How much of Aristotle’s four causes can be found in the German legal method to interpret laws? Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, III(3), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.25162/arsp-2016-0020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25162/arsp-2016-0020
Koswara, W. (2022). Implementasi aturan perlindungan data pribadi oleh penyelenggara sistem elektronik dikaitkan dengan teori keadilan dan kepastian hukum. Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pelita Harapan, 7(2), 86-103. https://doi.org/10.25170/paradigma.v7i2.3681 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25170/paradigma.v7i2.3681
Kuhe, C. K., & Kaluku, A. (2021). Diskursus penegakan hak asasi manusia di ASEAN dan Africa Union sebagai organisasi regional. Jurnal Legalitas, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo, 14(1), 53-76. https://doi.org/10.33756/JELTA.V14I01.10206 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33756/jelta.v14i01.10206
Margolang, F. I. (2024). Kontrak perdagangan internasional dalam perspektif hukum perdata dalam menyikapi perbedaan yuridiksi. Gerechtikeit Journal, Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati, 1(1), 26-31. https://journal.inacexter.com/index.php/gerechtikieit©International Academic Research Center
Mohan, S. C. (2012). Cross-border insolvency problems: Is the UNCITRAL Model Law the answer? International Insolvency Review, Singapore Management University, 21(3), 199-223. Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1145 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/iir.1203
Noho, M. D. H. (2019). Politik hukum pengaturan build operate transfer (BOT) di Indonesia: Di masa lalu, saat ini, dan akan datang. Jurnal Hukum Media Bhakti, 3(1), 88-99. https://doi.org/10.32501/jhmb.v3i1.51 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32501/jhmb.v3i1.51
Novaldy, M., & Alfarizi, A. (2024). Penerapan positivisme hukum terhadap asas keadilan dalam putusan pengadilan. Das Sollen: Jurnal Kajian Kontemporer Hukum dan Masyarakat, Universitas Pasundan, 2(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.11111/dassollen.xxxxxxx
Nrangwesti, A. (2022). Konsep kedaulatan dalam perspektif hukum internasional, hukum pidana dan pembangunan hukum. Hukum Pidana Dan Pembangunan Hukum, Universitas Trisakti, 5(1), 11-24. Retrieved from https://e-journal.trisakti.ac.id/index.php/hpph/issue/view/1044
Omar, P. J. (2008). Insolvency law: Themes and perspectives. Burlington: Ashgate Publishing.
Penjelasan UU Kepailitan (Pebjelasan Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan Dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang)
Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Pengganti Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 1998 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang tentang Kepailitan
Pratama, G. A., Zainab, N., & Siswanto, H. (2023). Legal remedies against bankruptcy decision following Constitutional Court decision No. 23/PUU-XIX/2021. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 7(2), 216-223. https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v7i2.1060 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v7i2.1060
Purba, J. A. A., & Burhanuddin, A. (2023). Encourage from fear: Perubahan nama Laut Natuna Utara sebagai upaya Indonesia dalam mempertahankan kedaulatan negara. Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin, 2(6), 13-20. https://doi.org/10.56127/jukim.v2i6.987 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56127/jukim.v2i6.987
Puspitasari, L. N. S., Septiandani, D., Sulistyani, R. S. D., & Sukarna, K. (2021). Problematika eksekusi harta pailit dalam cross border insolvency. Jurnal USM Law Review, Universitas Negeri Semarang, 4(2), 743-755. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v4i2.4238 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v4i2.4238
Putra, M. H. T., Marpudin, A., & Mega Jaya, B. P. (2023). The policy of banning the export of raw materials in the mining sector by the Indonesian government from the perspective of international trade law. Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi Dan Kajian Hukum, 22(3), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v22i3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v22i3.3333
Rahmawati, P., & Rizkianti, W. (2023). Insolvency test sebagai solusi preventif dalam konstruksi hukum kepailitan di Indonesia. Jurnal Yuridis, 10(2), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.35586/jyur.v10i2.6381 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35586/jyur.v10i2.6381
Ramusen, B. (2007). Where are all the transnational bankruptcies? American Law and Economics Annual Meetings. The Berkeley Electronic Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.982678
Rice University-OpenStax. (n.d.). Types of legal systems around the world. Retrieved from https://openstax.org/books/introduction-political-science/pages/11-3-types-of-legal-systems-around-the-world
Riry, W. A. (2021). Ratifikasi perjanjian internasional sebagai salah satu bentuk politik hukum nasional. Jurnal Syntax Transformation, 2(2), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.46799/jst.v2i2.228 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46799/jst.v2i2.228
Riwanto, A. (2016). Sejarah hukum: Konsep, teori, dan metodenya dalam pengembangan ilmu hukum. Oase Pustaka.
Rokilah, S. (2021). Penerapan asas hukum dalam pembentukan peraturan perundang-undangan. Ajudikasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 5(2), 179–190. https://doi.org/10.30656/ajudikasi.v5i2.3942 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30656/ajudikasi.v5i2.3942
Saba, C. S., Ngepah, N., & Odhiambo, N. M. (2023). Information and communication technology (ICT), growth, and development in developing regions: Evidence from a comparative analysis and a new approach. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01571-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01571-8
Shalihah, A., & Muni, A. (2023). Arah politik hukum dalam pembangunan sistem hukum nasional menurut undang-undang RPJPN 2005–2025. As-Shahifah Journal of Constitutional Law & Governance, 3(2), 187–203. https://doi.org/10.19105/asshahifah.v3i2.11094
Shidiq, R. M., Faisal, R., & Pratama, M. A. (2024). Rule of law dan perubahan hukum menurut Aristoteles. Praxis: Jurnal Filsafat Terapan, 1(2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.11111/praxis.xxxxxxx
Simanjuntak, R. (2015). Dispute settlement mechanisms under the ASEAN legal frameworks: A collective commitment creating the ruled-based ASEAN Economic Community. Jakarta: Kontan Publishing.
Simanjuntak, R. A., Akbar, F., Sunarmi, & Lubis, M. Y. (2021). Dampak globalisasi terhadap eksistensi Pancasila sebagai staatsfundamentalnorm bagi bangsa dan negara Indonesia dalam pembentukan hukum nasional. Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum, 2(2), 217–233. https://doi.org/10.32662/golrev.v2i2.704
Sirait, Y. H. (2019). General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) dan kedaulatan negara non-Uni Eropa. Gorontalo Law Review, 2(2), 60–71. https://doi.org/10.32662/golrev.v2i2.704 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32662/golrev.v2i2.704
Sjahdeini, S. R. (2016). Sejarah, asas, dan teori hukum kepailitan (Memahami undang-undang No. 37 tahun 2004 tentang kepailitan dan penundaan kewajiban pembayaran). Jakarta: Kencana.
Sjahdeini, S. R. (2018). Sejarah, asas, dan teori hukum kepailitan: Memahami undang-undang No 37 tahun 2004 tentang kepailitan dan penundaan kewajiban pembayaran utang (Edisi Kedua). Jakarta: Prenamedia Group.
Subarkah, A. R. (2019). Kepentingan Indonesia dalam mengambil alih Flight Information Region (FIR) dari Singapura. Jurnal Asia Pacific Studies, 3(2), 145–155. https://doi.org/10.33541/japs.v3i2.1317 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33541/japs.v3i2.1317
Sulistio, C. T., & Trisnamansyah, P. (2020). Balancing host state sovereignty and foreign investors’ rights through a mining divestment rule. Transnational Business Law Journal, 1(1), 73–90. Retrieved from https://jurnal.fh.unpad.ac.id/index.php/transbuslj/article/view/287
Sulistyawan, A. Y. (2019). Urgensi harmonisasi hukum nasional terhadap perkembangan hukum global akibat globalisasi. Jurnal Hukum Progresif, 7(2), 171–181. https://doi.org/10.14710/hp.7.2.171-181 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/hp.7.2.171-181
Suryana. (2007). Hukum kepailitan: Kepailitan terhadap badan usaha asing oleh pengadilan niaga Indonesia. Bandung: Pustaka Sustra.
Sutrisno, F., Puluhulawa, F., & Tijow, L. M. (2029). Penerapan asas keadilan, kepastian hukum dan kemanfaatan dalam putusan hakim tindak pidana korupsi. Gorontalo Law Review, 3(2), 168–187. E-ISSN: 2614-5030 P-ISSN: 2614-5022.
Sutter, O. (2020). The centre of main interest is in the eye of the beholder: The perspective from Europe. Norton Rose Fulbright. Retrieved from https://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/
Syauta, R. A. J. (2022). Perbandingan sistem hukum Benua Eropa dan sistem hukum nasional Indonesia. Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia, 3(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.51749/jphi.v3i1.53 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51749/jphi.v3i1.53
Tan, K., & Disemadi, H. S. (2022). Politik hukum pembentukan hukum yang responsif dalam mewujudkan tujuan negara Indonesia. Jurnal Meta-Yuridis, 5(1), 60–72. https://doi.org/10.26877/m-y.v5i1.8803 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26877/m-y.v5i1.8803
The Cornell Law School. (n.d.). 11 U.S. Code § 1515 - Application for recognition. Retrieved from https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/11/1515
The U.S. Courts. (n.d.). Bankruptcy. Retrieved from https://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/bankruptcy
The US Bankruptcy Code. (n.d.). Chapter 15 - Bankruptcy basics ancillary and other cross-border cases. Retrieved from https://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/bankruptcy/bankruptcy-basics/chapter-15-bankruptcy-basics
The US Bankruptcy Code. (N/A). Chapter 15 - Bankruptcy Basics Ancillary and Other Cross-Border Cases. Retrieved from https://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/bankruptcy/bankruptcy-basics/chapter-15-bankruptcy-basics
Tomasic, R. (2007). Insolvency law in East Asia. London: Ashgate Publishing.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan Dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 4 Tahun 1998. tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang tentang Kepailitan Menjadi Undang-Undang.
Westbrook, J. (2016). Global solution to multinational default. Michigan Law Review, 98, 2276–2326. https://doi.org/10.2307/1290306 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1290306
Widagdo, S., & Kurniaty, R. (2021). Prinsip Responsibility to Protect (R2P) dalam konflik Israel-Palestina: Bagaimana sikap Indonesia. Arena Hukum, 14(2), 314–327. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2021.01402.6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2021.01402.6
Yatna, I. K. G. S. S., & Purwanti, N. P. (2020). Perbandingan hukum negara Indonesia dengan hukum negara Belanda dalam penyelesaian perkara sisa hutang debitor pailit. Acta Comitas: Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan, 5(2), 375–388. https://doi.org/10.24843/AC.2020.v05.i02.p14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24843/AC.2020.v05.i02.p14
Zakaria, E. H. P. (2023). Penerapan Omnibus Law dalam sistem legislasi nasional menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2022. Journal of Social Science Research, Universitas Sam Ratulangi, 3(3), 10719–17033. E-ISSN 2807-4238, P-ISSN 2807-4246.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Unggul Wibawa Widhayaka, Sonyendah Retnaningsih, Sufiarina

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
For all articles published in IJRBS, copyright is retained by the authors. Articles are licensed under an open access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download and read the paper for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted provided that the original published version is cited. These conditions allow for maximum use and exposure of the work, while ensuring that the authors receive proper credit.