Sociotechnical challenges faced by students with disability and factors influencing the integration of assistive technologies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v13i6.3533Keywords:
Conventional, digitalisation, Procurement, digital age, Estrangement, TechnophiliaAbstract
The sociotechnical challenges primarily faced by students with disabilities are significantly hindering their active participation in academic programs. This study, therefore, holds immense importance as it aims to examine these challenges and evaluate the factors influencing the introduction of Assistive Technology in response to these issues. The researchers have used a to delve deep into these challenges and establish potential mitigation strategies for fostering inclusive education and a supportive learning environment. This study uses quantitative and qualitative data to understand factors influencing the integration of ATs in inclusive education. As a result, the study's findings, particularly the absence of a framework in the university disability unit, which is responsible for guiding the use and integration of AT, are crucial for understanding the current state of affairs. The delays in acquiring and delivering ATs result in students missing out on learning how to use the technologies. The use of ATs in the university was affected by the lack of training of lecturers who taught the students living with disabilities. Although there are ATs in the disability unit, they seem to be used by students who need urgent support and who need it in a limited time. Due to these factors, the study concluded that several factors influenced the integration of ATs in inclusive education at the university, and these need to be addressed urgently. This paper recommends that training should be conducted with lecturers and students to use ATs for learning and teaching purposes.
Downloads
References
Ahmed, A. (2018). Perceptions of using assistive technology for students with disabilities in the classroom. International Journal of Special Education, 33(1), 129–139.
Carey, D. M., & Sale, P. (1994). Practical considerations in the use of technology to facilitate the inclusion of students with severe disabilities. Technology and Disability, 3(2), 77-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/TAD-1994-3203
Chandra, L., Seidel, S., & Gregor, S. (2015). Prescriptive knowledge in IS research: Conceptualizing design principles in terms of materiality, action, and boundary conditions. In 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 4039–4048). IEEE Computer Society. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2015.485
Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 297–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613
Coflan, C. M., & Kaye, T. (2020). Using education technology to support students with special educational needs and disabilities in low- and middle-income countries (No. 4). EdTech Hub. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53832/edtechhub.0021
Coleman, M. B., Cramer, E. S., Park, Y., & Bell, S. M. (2015). Art educators’ use of adaptations, assistive technology, and special education supports for students with physical, visual, severe, and multiple disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 27(5), 637–660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-015-9440-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-015-9440-6
Copley, J., & Ziviani, J. (2004). Barriers to the use of assistive technology for children with multiple disabilities. Occupational Therapy International, 11(4), 229-243. https://doi.org/10.1002/oti.213 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/oti.213
Creswell, J. W., & Plano-Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
European Parliamentary Research Service (EPRS) & Scientific Foresight Unit (STOA). (2018).
Farjoun, M., Ansell, C., & Boin, A. (2015). Pragmatism in organization studies: Meeting the challenges of a dynamic and complex world. Organization Science, 26(6), 1787-1804. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2015.1016
Fernández-Batanero, J. M., Montenegro-Rueda, M., Fernández-Cerero, J., et al. (2022). Assistive technology for the inclusion of students with disabilities: A systematic review. Education Technology Research and Development, 70, 1911–1930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10127-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10127-7
Zitha, I., Mokganya, M. G., & Manyage, T. (2023). Integration of blended learning in the advent of COVID-19: Online learning experiences of the science foundation students. Education Sciences, 13(7), 704. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070704. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070704
Fourie, D., & Malan, C. (2020). Public procurement in the South African economy: Addressing the systemic issues. Sustainability, 12(20), 8692. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208692
Hezart, A., Naik, S., Araujo, A., & Watters, P. A. (2005). Solving frame-based accessibility problems in web content management. In International Conference on Computational Intelligence for Modelling, Control and Automation and International Conference on Intelligent Agents, Web Technologies and Internet Commerce (CIMCA-IAWTIC'06) (Vol. 1, pp. 246-250). IEEE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CIMCA.2005.1631273
Judge, S., & Simms, K. A. (2009). Assistive technology training at the pre-service level: A national snapshot of teacher preparation programs. Teacher Education and Special Education, 32(1), 33-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406408330868
Kimberly, H. (2023). Effective use of assistive technology to accommodate students with learning disabilities. Culminating Projects in Special Education, 149. https://repository.stcloudstate.edu/sped_etds/149
Kolb, S. M., & Griffith, A. C. S. (2012). Planning for implementing assistive technology: A functional approach for practitioners. In Educational Stages and Interactive Learning: From Kindergarten to Workplace Training (pp. 485-497). IGI Global. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-0137-6.ch026
Lopez-Gavira, R., Moriña, A., & Morgado, B. (2021). Challenges to inclusive education at the university: The perspective of students and disability support service staff. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 34(3), 292–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2019.1578198 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2019.1578198
Machika, P., & Johnson, B. (2015). Postgraduate students' experience of poverty and academic success at a university of technology in South Africa. South African Journal of Higher Education, 29(6), 167-181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20853/29-6-542
Manase, N. (2023). Self-devised assistive techniques by university students with learning disabilities. African Journal of Disability, 12(0), a1106. https://doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v12i0.1106 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v12i0.1106
Melnikovas, A. (2023). Towards an explicit research methodology: Adapting research onion model for futures studies. https://doi.org/10.6531/JFS.201812_23(2).0003
Mishra, M. P., Sharma, V. K., & Tripathi, R. C. (2010). ICT as a tool for teaching and learning in respect of learners with disabilities.
Moloi, K., Makgoba, M. W., & Ogutu Miruka, C. (2017). (De)constructing the #FeesMustFall campaign in South African higher education. Contemporary Education Dialogue, 14(2), 211-223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0973184917716999
Morar, T., & Bayaga, A. (2023). Assistive computer application software: A tool for enhancing mathematics cognition. Journal of Namibian Studies: History Politics Culture, 34, bayaga-mandela.
Priest, N., & May, E. (2001). Laptop computers and children with disabilities: Factors influencing success. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 48(1), 11–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1630.2001.00220.x
Rashied, N. (2018). Adaptive learning technology in higher education: Lessons from an economics classroom in South Africa. Beyond Familiar Territories.
Samant Raja, D., & Matter, R. (2015). Assistive technology access and service delivery in resource-limited environments: Introduction to a special issue of Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 10(4), 267-270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2015.1039607
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2012). Research methods for business students (6th ed.). Cape Town: Pearson Education Limited.
Schoonenboom, J., & Johnson, R. B. (2017). How to construct a mixed methods research design. KZfSS Kolner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 60(2), 107–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-017-0454-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-017-0454-1
Shunnag, A. S. S. (2016). The influence of Jordanian EFL undergraduates' online reading habits on their academic achievement (Doctoral dissertation, Universiti Sains Malaysia).
Sotoa. (2018).
Todis, B., & Walker, H. M. (1993). User perspectives on assistive technology in educational settings. Focus on Exceptional Children, 26(3), 1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17161/foec.v26i3.6888
Vincent, D. A., Okeowo, R. O., & Ariyo, S. (2024). The use of assistive technology in technical colleges for students with disabilities in Ondo State. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 14, 52–67. https://doi.org/10.5590/JERAP.2024.14.1.04
Vincent, D. A., Okeowo, R. O., & Ariyo, S. (2024). The use of assistive technology in technical colleges for students with disabilities in Ondo State. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 14, 52–67. https://doi.org/10.5590/JERAP.2024.14.1.04 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5590/JERAP.2024.14.1.04
Vincent, L., & Chiwandire, D. (2019). Funding and inclusion in higher education institutions for students with disabilities. African Journal of Disability, 8(1), 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v7i0.555
Visagiei, S., Scheffleri, E., Seymourii, N., & Mjii, G. (2020). Assistive technology service delivery in South Africa: Conceptualizing a systems approach. South African Health Review, 2020, 119-127. https://www.hst.org.za/publications/South%20African%20Health%20Reviews/SAHR_Chapter%2012_15122020_Final.pdf
Watters, A. (2023). Teaching machines: The history of personalized learning. MIT Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Vhutshilo Macheque, Armstrong Kadyamatimba, Nixon Ochara
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
For all articles published in IJRBS, copyright is retained by the authors. Articles are licensed under an open access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download and read the paper for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted provided that the original published version is cited. These conditions allow for maximum use and exposure of the work, while ensuring that the authors receive proper credit.
