Research and publication at crossroads

exploring the catalysts of ethical misconducts of scholarly work

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v13i5.3394

Keywords:

Scientific misconduct, ethical misconduct, research misconduct, publication misconduct, research fraud

Abstract

Writing and publishing scientific and rigorous work needs a high level of integrity and adherence to ethical guidelines. Several publications have been rejected by authentic journals as a result of not adhering to a deontological standpoint. This laxity has posed deadly repercussions to the beholder including ruining its institutional image in academic scholarship. Notwithstanding, numerous writers are acquainted with the consequences of not observing ethical standards in research and publication, yet in trying to put up their pieces of work get caught in the same quandary. Anchored on a thematically oriented review of literature, it was imperative to try to explain the key ethical misconduct bases in research and publication. To fulfil this quest many journal articles were analysed. It was found that numerous aspects form the basis for misconduct in research and publication including; the pressure to ‘publish or perish’, the limitation of mentorship and guidance programs, knowledge on research and publication, promotion and academic advancement, competition among colleagues, workload pressure, financial motives, pressure from individual morality, and the challenge of research culture. Consequently, it is imperative to note that to publish a scholarly piece of work, adhering to ethical standards is non-negotiable.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Nivad Mwilongo, Mzumbe University

Tutorial Assistant, Department of Public Service and Human Resource Management, Mzumbe University, Tanzania

Denis Kamugisha, Mzumbe University

Senior Lecturer, Department of Local Governance and Management Studies, Mzumbe University, Tanzania

Zuena Kilugwe, Mzumbe University

Lecturer, Department of Local Governance and Management Studies, Mzumbe University, Tanzania

References

Abimbola, I.O., I. O., Tola, O., Popoola, B. G., Folorunso, J. O., Amao-Taiwo, B., Ige, O., ... & Eze, B. U. (2021). Unethical research practices: an empirical evaluation of ‘abeg add my name' malady in Nigeria. Hallmark University Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 3(1), 191-204.

Ahuja, S. (2020). Publication Ethics, Publication Misconduct & Predatory Journals. November. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.21546.85447

Arya, S. C. (2021). Research Ethics and Research Integrity. May, OmniScience: A Multi-disciplinary Journal. (pp. 8–15). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/276275990

Arzmi, M. H. (2021). Scientific research misconducts; An overview. IIUM Journal of Orofacial and Health Sciences, 2(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.31436/ijohs.v2i1.69 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31436/ijohs.v2i1.69

Awasthi, S. (2019). Plagiarism and academic misconduct: A systematic review. DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology, 39(2), 94–100. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.39.2.13622 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.39.2.13622

Boseley, S. (2017, November 27). Lancet retracts “utterly false” MMR paper. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2010/feb/02/lancet-retracts-mmr-paper

Brown, S. R., & Lund, J. (2024). POP culture: the increasing perils of publish or perish. A farewell from the Editors in Chief. Techniques in Coloproctology, 28(1), 20–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-023-02900-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-023-02900-4

Bülow, W., & Helgesson, G. (2019). Criminalization of scientific misconduct. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 22(2), 245–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-018-9865-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-018-9865-7

Campos-Varela, I., & Ruano-Raviña, A. (2019). Misconduct as the main cause for retraction. A descriptive study of retracted publications and their authors. Gaceta Sanitaria, 33(4), 356–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.01.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.01.009

Casadevall, A., & Fang, F. C. (2012). Reforming science: Methodological and cultural reforms. Infection and Immunity, 80(3), 891–896. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.06183-11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.06183-11

Chau, D. M., Chai, L. C., Cheema, M. S., & Veerakumarasivam, A. (2021). Mainstreaming responsible conduct of research education in Malaysia. Forensic Sciences Research, 6(4), 338–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/20961790.2021.1987619 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20961790.2021.1987619

Dal-Ré, R., Bouter, L. M., Cuijpers, P., Gluud, C., & Holm, S. (2020). Should research misconduct be criminalized? Research Ethics, 16(1–2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016119898400 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016119898400

Daroff, R. B. (2008). Scientific misconduct and breach of publication ethics. Anatomy (International Journal of Experimental and Clinical Anatomy), 2(December 2010), 7–8. https://doi.org/10.2399/ana.08.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2399/ana.08.007

Gedutis, A., Biagetti, M. T., & Ma, L. (2022). The challenges for research evaluation ethics in the social sciences. Handbook on Research Assessment in the Social Sciences, May, 367–385. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800372559.00032 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800372559.00032

Godlee, F., Smith, J., & Marcovitch, H. (2011). Wakefield’s article linking MMR vaccine and autism was fraudulent. BMJ. British Medical Journal, 342(jan05 1), c7452. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c7452 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c7452

Gopalakrishna, G., Riet, G., Vink, G., Stoop, I., Wicherts, J. M., & Bouter, L. M. (2022). Prevalence of questionable research practices , research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors?: A survey among academic researchers in The Netherlands. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/vk9yt

Hewett, M. (2022). Ethics and toxic high-workload work environments. British Journal of General Practice, 72(718), 226–227. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp22X719333 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp22X719333

Holtfreter, K., Reisig, M. D., Pratt, T. C., & Mays, R. D. (2019). The perceived causes of research misconduct among faculty members in the natural, social, and applied sciences. Studies in Higher Education, 0(0), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1593352 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1593352

Jenn, N. C. (2006). Common Ethical Issues In Research And Publication. Malaysian Family Physician?: The Official Journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia, 1(2–3), 74–76. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27570592%0Ahttp://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=PMC4453117

Kennet, A. M., & Shkodkina, Y. (2018). A Review of the Factors behind Academic Integrity Violations: Comparing the United States and Ukraine. Business Ethics and Leadership, 2(2), 84–96. https://doi.org/10.21272/bel.2(2).84-96.2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21272/bel.2(2).84-96.2018

Lakhotia, S. C. (2022). Publication integrity, authorship, and misconduct. In The Quintessence of Basic and Clinical Research and Scientific Publishing (pp. 907-920). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org./10.1007/978-981-99-1284-1_59 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-1284-1_59

Lal, K. K., & Sharma, B. (2023). Research Integrity & Ethics: Scientific Misconduct. In Research Integrity & Ethics. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373719345.

Maggio, L., Dong, T., Driessen, E., & Artino, A. (2019). Factors associated with scientific misconduct and questionable research practices in health professions education. Perspectives on Medical Education, 8(2), 74–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-019-0501-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/S40037-019-0501-X

Marusic, A., Wager, E., Utrobicic, A., Sambunjak, D., Anderson, M. S., & Rothstein, H. R. (2013). Interventions to prevent misconduct and promote integrity in research and publication. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2013(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.MR000038 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.MR000038

Mirza, C., Bellalem, F., & Mirza, H. (2023). Ethical Considerations in Qualitative Research: Summary Guidelines for Novice Social Science Researchers. Social Studies and Research Journal, 11(May), 441–449. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/370838199

Mondal, A. (2022). Publication Misconduct: Concept, Types, Reason and Consequences. Research & Publication Ethics, January, 34–36.

Mwita, K., Kinunda, S., Obwolo, S., & Mwilongo, N. (2023). Soft skills development in higher education institutions: Students’ perceived role of universities and students’ self-initiatives in bridging the soft skills gap. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478), 12(3), 505–513. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v12i3.2435 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v12i3.2435

Mwita, K., Mwoka, D., & Mwakasangula, E. (2023). The Impact of Organisational Culture on Turnover Intentions among Lecturers in Tanzania’s Public Universities. East Africa Journal of Social and Applied Sciences (EAJ-SAS), 5(1), 80-97. https://doi.org/10.2022/eaj-sas.v5i1.153

Mwita, K. (2022). Factors to consider when choosing data collection methods. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478), 11(5), 532–538. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v11i5.1842 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v11i5.1842

Olesen, A., Amin, L., & Mahadi, Z. (2018). Unethical authorship practices: A qualitative study in Malaysian higher education institutions. Developing World Bioethics, 18(3), 271–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/dewb.12200 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/dewb.12200

Olesen, A. P., Amin, L., & Mahadi, Z. (2018). In Their Own Words: Research Misconduct from the Perspective of Researchers in Malaysian Universities. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24(6), 1755–1776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9997-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9997-9

Pan, P. (2020). Ethics in research and publication. Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons, 25(6), 349. https://doi.org/10.4103/jiaps.JIAPS_219_19 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jiaps.JIAPS_219_19

Paruzel-Czachura, M., Baran, L., & Spendel, Z. (2021). Publish or be ethical? Publishing pressure and scientific misconduct in research. Research Ethics, 17(3), 375–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016120980562 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016120980562

Pratt, T. C., Reisig, M. D., Holtfreter, K., & Golladay, K. A. (2019). Scholars’ preferred solutions for research misconduct: results from a survey of faculty members at America’s top 100 research universities. Ethics and Behavior, 29(7), 510–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2019.1612748 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2019.1612748

Resnik, D. B., Neal, T., Raymond, A., & Kissling, G. E. (2015). Research Misconduct Definitions Adopted by U.S. Research Institutions. Accountability in Research, 22(1), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2014.891943 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2014.891943

Rossouw, T. M., Van Zyl, C., & Pope, A. (2014). Responsible conduct of research: Global trends, local opportunities. South African Journal of Science, 110(1–2), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1590/sajs.2014/20130103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/sajs.2014/20130103

Roy, D. A., & rana, D. L. (2020). Ethics in Research & Publication. In Ethics in Research & Publication (Issue September). https://doi.org/10.47211/book.2020.9788194680413 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47211/book.2020.9788194680413

Sachan, A., Khanna, S., & Sharma, V. (2022). Publication ethics and misconducts. Indian Journal of Rheumatology, 17(6), S334–S341. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-3698.364678 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-3698.364678

Shitindo, M., Gasch Gallén, Á., & Nabil, F. (2022). African history of research ethics violations: lessons for the future (No. BOOK-2022-011). Universidad de Zaragoza. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.24967.68004

Singh, S., Dhir, S., Sharma, M., & Singh, T. (2018). Publication misconduct: Perceptions of participants of a faculty development programme. National Medical Journal of India, 31(3), 169–171. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-258X.255762 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-258X.255762

Stabingis, L., Šarlauskien?, L., & ?epaitien?, N. (2014). Measures for Plagiarism Prevention in Students’ Written Works: Case Study of ASU Experience. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 110(May), 689–699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.913 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.913

Talwar, Y., & Aravind, D. S. (2021). Publication Misconduct. Emperor International Journal of Library and Information Technology Research, 01(02), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.35337/eijlitr.2021.1203 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35337/EIJLITR.2021.1203

Tourish, D., & Craig, R. (2020). Research Misconduct in Business and Management Studies: Causes, Consequences, and Possible Remedies. Journal of Management Inquiry, 29(2), 174–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492618792621 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492618792621

Ugwu, C. N., Eze, V. H. U., Ugwu, J. N., Ogenyi, F. C., & Ugwu, O. P. (2023). Ethical Publication Issues in the Collection and Analysis of Research Data. Newport International Journal of Scientific and Experimental Sciences, 3(2), 132–140.

Wiwanitkit, V. (2017). Misconduct in research and publication. Iranian Biomedical Journal, 21(5), 284. https://doi.org/10.18869/acadpub.ibj.21.5.284 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18869/acadpub.ibj.21.5.284

Yu, L., Miao, M., Liu, W., Zhang, B., & Zhang, P. (2021). Scientific misconduct and associated factors: A survey of researchers in three Chinese tertiary hospitals. Accountability in Research, 28(2), 95–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2020.1809386 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2020.1809386

Downloads

Published

2024-08-20

How to Cite

Mwilongo, N., Kamugisha, D., & Kilugwe, Z. (2024). Research and publication at crossroads: exploring the catalysts of ethical misconducts of scholarly work. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478), 13(5), 914–922. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v13i5.3394

Issue

Section

Related Topics in Social Science