Shareholder loyalty and firm value creating outcomes in Kenya
The study aimed at examining the effect of shareholder loyalty on firm value-creating outcomes in Kenya. The study used a sample of 117 institutional shareholders in listed firms in Kenya. Data was collected through questionnaires and analyzed using descriptive statistics such as mean, mode, and median and inferential statistics including factor analysis, regression, and analysis of variance (ANOVA). The study concluded that shareholder loyalty has no significant effect on firm value-creating outcomes. The study contributes to the literature on shareholder engagement, particulary on shareholder loyalty from a Kenyan angle. Shareholders are advised to consider their initial cost of investment, costs, and penalties on exit and impact on their business interests with the firm as they decide on their voice or exit actions.
Adegbite, E., Amaeshi, K., & Amao, O. (2012). The politics of shareholder activism in Nigeria. Journal of Business Ethics, 105(3), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0974-y
Admati, A. R., & Pfleiderer, P. (2009). The “Wall Street Walk” and shareholder activism: Exit as a form of voice. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(7), 2645–2685. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhp037
Amao, O., & Amaeshi, K. (2008). Galvanising shareholder activism: A prerequisite for effective corporate governance and accountability in Nigeria. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(1), 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9566-2
Becht, M., Franks, J., Grant, J., & Wagner, H. F. (2017). Returns to hedge fund activism: An international study. Review of Financial Studies, 30(9), 2933–2971. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhx048
Black, B. S., & Coffee Jr., J. C. (1994). Hail Britannia?: Institutional investor behavior under limited regulation. Michigan Law Review, 92(7), 1997–2087.
Chung, H., & Talaulicar, T. (2010). Forms and effects of shareholder activism. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(4), 253–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2010.00806.x
Clark, G. L., & Hebb, T. (2004). Pension fund corporate engagement: The fifth stage of capitalism. Industrial Relations, 59(1), 142–171. https://doi.org/10.7202/009130ar
Crespi, R., & Renneboog, L. (2010). Is (Institutional) shareholder activism new? Evidence from UK shareholder coalitions in the pre-Cadbury era. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(4), 274–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2010.00795.x
Denes, M. R., Karpoff, J. M., & McWilliams, V. B. (2017). Thirty years of shareholder activism: A survey of empirical research. Journal of Corporate Finance. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.03.005
Donald, D. C. (2005). Shareholder voice and its opponents. The Journal of Corporate Law Studies, 5(2), 1–60.
Edmans, A., & Manso, G. (2011). Governance through trading and intervention: A theory of multiple blockholders. The Review of Financial Studies, 24(7), 2395–2428. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhq145
Gillan, S. L., & Starks, L. T. (2007). The evolution of shareholder activism in the United States. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 19(1), 55–73.
Goodman, J., Louche, C., van Cranenburgh, K. C., & Arenas, D. (2014). Social shareholder engagement: The dynamics of voice and exit. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(2), 193–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1890-0
Goranova, M., & Ryan, L. V. (2014). Shareholder activism: A multidisciplinary review. Journal of Management (Vol. 40). https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313515519
Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.
Ingley, C., Mueller, J., & Cocks, G. (2011). The financial crisis, investor activists and corporate strategy: Will this mean shareholders in the boardroom? Journal of Management and Governance, 15(4), 557–587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-010-9130-9
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Kim, J., & Schloetzer, J. D. (2013). Global trends in board-shareholder engagement. The Conference Board Director Notes, DN-V5N20(October), 1–11.
Marler, J. H., & Faugère, C. (2010). Shareholder activism and middle management equity incentives. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(4), 313–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2010.00794.x
McCahery, J. A., Sautner, Z., & Starks, L. T. (2016). Behind the scenes: The corporate governance preferences of institutional investors. Journal of Finance, 71(6), 2905–2932.
McNulty, T., & Nordberg, D. (2016). Ownership, activism and engagement: Institutional investors as active owners. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(3), 346–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12143
Pergola, T. M., & Verreault, D. A. (2011). Motivations and potential monitoring effects of large shareholders. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: The International Journal of Business in Society, 9(5), 551–563. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700910998120
Pfarrer, M. D. (2010). What is the purpose of the firm?: Shareholder and stakeholder theories. In J. O’Toole & D. Mayer (Eds.), Good business: Exercising effective and ethical leadership (pp. 86–93). Routledge.
Singh, A. S., & Masuku, M. B. (2014). Sampling techniques & determination of sample size in applied statistics research: An overview. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, II(11), 1–22.
Viviers, S., & Smit, E. vdM. (2015). Institutional proxy voting in South Africa: Process, outcomes and impact. South African Journal of Business Management, 46(4), 23–34.
Yamahaki, C., & Frynas, J. G. (2016). Institutional determinants of private shareholder engagement in Brazil and South Africa: The role of regulation. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(5), 509–527. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12166
Copyright (c) 2019 International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to IJRBS agree to publish their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution- 4.0 NC license, allowing third parties to share their work (copy, distribute, transmit) and to adapt it, under the condition that the authors are given credit, that the work is not used for commercial purposes, and that in the event of reuse or distribution, the terms of this license are made clear. Authors retain copyright of their work, with first publication rights granted to IJRBS. However, authors are required to transfer copyrights associated with commercial use to the Publisher. The authors agree to the terms of this Copyright Notice, which will apply to this submission if and when it is published by this journal
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously( exceptin the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, it will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other languages, without the written consent of the Publisher. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication