Entrepreneurial opportunity discovery dimensions and growth of non-governmental organizations in Kenya
Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) play a critical role in addressing social ills like poverty, employment, and food insecurity; therefore, their growth prospects enhance their ability to address these social ills. Discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities amongst the agro-based NGOs has not got the desired attention, and it is the least researched area in social entrepreneurship. This study investigated the relationship between Entrepreneurial Opportunity Discovery Dimensions and Growth of Non-Governmental Organizations in Kenya. It employed correlation design and was anchored on the Kirznerian Entrepreneurship Theory. The target population was 135 agro-based NGOs in Kenya. A mixed-method approach was used, combined qualitative and quantitative techniques. Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21 and Analysis of Moment Structures (AMOS graphic-25) aided in the analysis. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) using AMOS and Simple linear regression analysis were the primary analysis techniques used to evaluate the relationship between entrepreneurial opportunity discovery dimensions and the growth of NGOs. The results indicated that alertness0.372, p=0.033)and prior knowledge (0.163, p=0.031) have a significant favorable influence on growth, while social networks 0.047, p=0.713) showed an insignificant effect on the growth of NGOs. Investing in acquiring alert individuals and helping them gain relevant knowledge in the 21sttechnologies and emerging issues can lead to increased NGO ability to continue serving the community effectively and be engines of development for the general good of Kenya.
Adomako, S., Danso, A., Boso, N., & Narteh, B. (2018). Entrepreneurial alertness and new venture performance: facilitating roles of networking capability. International Small Business Journal, 36(5), 453-472. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0266242617747667
Aldashev, G., & Navarra, C. (2018), Development NGOs: basic facts. Annals of public and cooperative economics, 89(1), 125-155 https://www.unamur.be/en/eco/eeco/pdf/1409.pdf.
Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B. (2014). Entrepreneurial opportunities and poverty alleviation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(1), 159-184.retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fetap.12078
Ardichvili, A., Cardozo, R., & Ray, S. (2003). A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development. Journal of Business venturing, 18(1), 105-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026 (01)00068-4.
Atkinson A. B., Backus P. G., Micklewright J., Pharoah C. And Schnepf S. V., 2012, ‘Charitable giving for overseas development: UK trends over a quarter century’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A, 175, 167–190.
Bloom, P. N., & Chatterji, A. K. (2009). Scaling social entrepreneurial impact, California management review, 51(3), 114-133. https://centers.fuqua.duke.edu/case/wpcontent/uploads/sites/7/2015/02/Article_Bloom_ScalingSocialEntrepreneurialImpact_2009.pdf
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sage focus editions, 154, 136- 136.https://books.google.co.ke/books?hl=en&lr=&id=FvIxxeYDLx4C&oi=fnd&pg=PA136&dq=Brown,+M.,+%26+Cudeck,+R.+(1993).+Alternative+ways+of+assessing+model+fit.+K.+Bollen+and+J.&ots=_M-Ey1YHwQ&sig=rFvUot7aoWo_zAciNP1nTiFsUBw&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
Busenitz, L. W., West III, G. P., Shepherd, D., Nelson, T., Chandler, G. N., &Zacharakis, A. (2003). Entrepreneurship Research in Emergence: Past Trends and Future Directions. Journal of Management, 29(3), 285-308. https://doi.org/10.1016%2FS0149-2063_03_00013-8
Byrne, B. M. (2013). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203807644
Carman, J. G. (2007). Evaluation practice among community-based organizations: Research into the reality. American Journal of evaluation, 28(1), 60-75.
Craig, J., & Lindsay, N. (2001). Quantifying ‘gut feeling’in the opportunity recognition process. Frontiers of entrepreneurship research, 124-137.
Duffield, M. (2012). Challenging environments: Danger, resilience and the aid industry, Security dialogue, 43(5), 5-492 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0967010612457975
Dutta, D. K., &Crossan, M. M. (2005). The Nature of Entrepreneurial Opportunities: Understanding the Process using the 4I Organizational Learning Framework. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(4), 425-449. Retrivied from: https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1540-6520.2005.00092.x
Fatima, S., Iqbal, S., Rehman, F. U., & Ali, M. (2011). A study of factors affecting opportunity recognition process—case study of Pakistan, an opportunity recognition process framework. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 3(8), 1106-1125.
George, N. M., Parida, V., Lahti, T., & Wincent, J. (2016). A systematic literature review of entrepreneurial opportunity recognition: insights on influencing factors. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 12(2), 309-350.
González, M. F., Husted, B. W., & Aigner, D. J. (2017), Opportunity discovery and creation in social entrepreneurship: An exploratory study in Mexico. Journal of Business Research, 81, 212-220. Retrieved: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.10.032
Grecu, I. (2014). Factors of Entrepreneurial Opportunity Recognition: A Systematic Review of Evidence in the Last Decade (Master’s thesis) Retrieved from http://projekter.aau.dk/projekter/en/studentthesis/factors-of-entrepreneurial-opportunityrecognition-a-systematic-review-of-empirical-evidence-in-the-last-decade (3d177ae2- e758-4902-9c54-d23c3b5efff9).html
Grim, J., Hora, J., Boček, P., Somol, P., &Pudil, P. (2010).Statistical Model of the 2001 Czech Census for Interactive Presentation, Journal of Official Statistics, 26(4), 67). retrived from:https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jii_Grim/publication/228859684_Statistical_Model_of_the_2001_Czech_Census_for_Interactive_Presentation/links/0fcfd507c02045c730000000/Statistical-Model-of-the-2001-Czech-Census-for-Interactive-Presentation.pdf
Hajizadeh, A., &Zali, M. (2016).Prior Knowledge, Cognitive Characteristics and Opportunity Recognition.International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 22(1), 63-83. Retrieved from : https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-05-2015-0110
Israel, G. D. (2012).Sampling: Determining sample size. University of Florida IFAS Extension: http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/pd006
Kirzner, I. M. (1997). Entrepreneurial discovery and the competitive market process: An Austrian approach. Journal of economic Literature, 35(1), 60-85.
Kirzner, I. M. (2015). Competition and entrepreneurship. University of Chicago press.
Kline, R. B. (1998). Software review: Software programs for structural equation modeling: Amos, EQS, and LISREL. Journal of psychoeducational assessment, 16(4), 343-364, https://doi.org/10.1177%2F073428299801600407
Lomax, R. G., & Schumacker, R. E. (2004), A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling, psychology press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410610904
Lumpkin, G. T., & Lichtenstein, B. B. (2005).The Role of Organizational Learning in the Opportunity‐Recognition Process.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(4), 451-472. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1540-6520.2005.00093.x
Lumpkin, G. T., Moss, T. W., Gras, D. M., Kato, S., &Amezcua, A. S. (2013). Entrepreneurial Processes in Social Contexts: How are they Different, if at all? Small Business Economics, 40(3), 761-783. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11187-011-9399-3
MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological methods, 4(1), 84.
Marvel, M. R., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2007).Technology Entrepreneurs' Human Capital and Its Effects on Innovation Radicalness.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(6), 807-828.Of Small Business &Entrepreneurship, 21(2), 139-151. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1540-6520.2007.00209.x
Mary George, N., Parida, V., Lahti, T. et al. Int Entrep Manag J (2016) 12: 309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-014-0347-y
Miller, J. (2007). An effective performance measurement system: Developing an effective performance measurement system for city of Elmira sub-grantees. Unpublished manuscript, New York: Binghamton University, State University of New York.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1967). Psychometric theory (Vol. 226). New York: McGraw-Hill. Retrieved from : http://garfield.library.upenn.edu/classics1979/A1979HZ31300001.pdf
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2019). Creating shared value. In managing sustainable business (pp. 323-346). Springer, Dordrecht http://www.nuovavista.com/SharedValuePorterHarvardBusinessReview.PDF
Puhakka, V. (2007).Effects of Opportunity Discovery Strategies of Entrepreneurs on Performance of New Ventures.The Journal of Entrepreneurship, 16(1), 19-51.
Razali, N. M., & Wah, Y. B. (2011). Power comparisons of shapiro-wilk, kolmogorov-smirnov, lilliefors and anderson-darling tests. Journal of statistical modeling and analytics, 2(1), 21-33. Retrieved from : https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Bee_Yap/publication/267205556_Power_Comparisons_of_Shapiro-Wilk_Kolmogorov-Smirnov_Lilliefors_and_Anderson-Darling_Tests/links/5477245b0cf29afed61446e1/Power-Comparisons-of-Shapiro-Wilk-Kolmogorov-Smirnov-Lilliefors-and-Anderson-Darling-Tests.pdf
Robert C. MacCallum, Keith F. Widaman, Kristopher J. Preacher & Sehee Hong (2001) Sample Size in Factor Analysis: The Role of Model Error, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36:4, 611-637, DOI: 10.1207/S15327906MBR3604_06
Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field Of Research.Academy Of Management Review, 25(1), 217-226 https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.2791611
Shane, S., Locke, E. A., & Collins, C. J. (2003). Entrepreneurial motivation. Human Resource Management Review, 13(2), 257-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(03)00017-2
Salvador, E., Pinot De Villechenon, F., &López Rizzo, H. (2014). European Smes and the Brazilian Market: The Key Role of Social Networks. European Business Review, 26(4), 368-388.
Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273-1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
Copyright (c) 2019 International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to IJRBS agree to publish their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution- 4.0 NC license, allowing third parties to share their work (copy, distribute, transmit) and to adapt it, under the condition that the authors are given credit, that the work is not used for commercial purposes, and that in the event of reuse or distribution, the terms of this license are made clear. Authors retain copyright of their work, with first publication rights granted to IJRBS. However, authors are required to transfer copyrights associated with commercial use to the Publisher. The authors agree to the terms of this Copyright Notice, which will apply to this submission if and when it is published by this journal
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously( exceptin the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, it will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other languages, without the written consent of the Publisher. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication