Promoting transdisciplinary teaching and learning and research in a world that is faced with multifaceted challenges




teaching approaches, mono-disciplinary, intra-disciplinary, inter-disciplinary, multi-disciplinary, trans-disciplinary


With a lot of transformation in higher education, teaching, and learning is becoming very complex. To cope with the transformation that is so complex, academics must be innovative in their teaching. Their teaching should also influence the behaviour of their students. Students after completion of their studies must also be able to solve the challenges of society. There are several approaches to teaching and learning such as multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary, and ideally transdisciplinary, scholarship of teaching and learning, evidence-based teaching and learning, transdisciplinary teaching and learning and competence-based teaching and learning, and deep learning approaches among others. This paper focuses on the transdisciplinary research and teaching and learning approach. The aim of the paper is to investigate the importance of transdisciplinary research, teaching, and learning in a world that is faced with multifaceted challenges. This is a qualitative design paper where systemic desktop research was used. The systematic reviews follow structured and predefined methods to identify, appraise, and synthesise the relevant literature. Desktop research is a research method that involves the use of existing data. These are secondary collected and summarised data to increase the overall effectiveness of the investigation. Secondary research is much more cost-effective than primary research, as it uses existing data, unlike primary empirical research. The secondary literature was collected based on the history, challenges, and benefits of transdisciplinary research, teaching, and learning. The research study concludes that transdisciplinary research and teaching and learning approach is the way to go in solving constant challenges that face the world. The study recommends that university faculties, schools, and departments should engage in transdisciplinary teaching, and learning and research.


Download data is not yet available.


Appel, J. & Kim-Appel, D. (2018). Towards a Transdisciplinary View: Innovations in Higher Educat. International Journal of Teaching and Education, Vol. 2. pp. 61-74. DOI:

Bergmann, M., Brohmann, B., Hoffmann, E., Loibl, M.C., Rehaag, R. Engelbert Schramm, E. & Voß, J. (2005). Quality Criteria of Transdisciplinary Research: A Guide for the Formative Evaluation of Research Projects. Frankfurt: Institute for Social-Ecological.

Hubert, B. & Bonnemaire, J. (2000). La construction des objets dans la recherche interdisciplinaire finalisée: de nouvelles exigences pour l’évaluation. Society of Natural Sciences, Vol. 8. 5-19.

Clark, T.W. (2002). The Policy Process: A Practical Guide for Natural Resource Professionals. Yale University Press, New Haven, 215pp.

Deppert, W. (1998). Problemlösen durch Interdiszplinarität. In: W. Theobald (ed.), Integrative Umweltbewertung. Theorie und Beispiele aus der Praxis. Springer, Berlin, pp. 3–64. DOI:

Eley, M. G. (2006). Teachers’ conceptions of teaching, and the making of specific decisions in planning to teach. Higher Education, 51(2), 191–214. DOI:

Forrester, J.W. (1961). Industrial Dynamics. M.I.T. Press Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 464pp.

Giacos, A. (2020). Transdisciplinary Teaching and Learning: An Experiment. 6th International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd’20). DOI:

Gibbs, P. (2022). A Transdisciplinary Currer. Journal of Educational Studies, 21(2): 6-17.

Gow, L., & Kember, D. (1993). Conceptions of teaching and their relationship to student learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63(1), 20–23. DOI:

Groß, M. (2004). Human Geography and Ecological Sociology: The Unfolding of a Human Ecology, 1890–1930 and Beyond, Social Science History, Vol. 28. 57–605. DOI:

Habermas, J. (1968). Erkenntnis und Interesse. In: J. Habermas (ed.). Technik und Wissenschaft als Ideologie. Suhrkamp: Frankfurt am Main, pp. 146–168.

Habermas, J. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 1, Reason and the Rationalization of Society, Beacon Press, Boston, 465pp.

Habermas, J. (1987). The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 2, Lifeworld and System, A Critique of Functionalist Reason, Beacon Press, Boston, 457pp.

Hadorn, Biber-Klemm, Grossenbacher-Mansuy, Hoffmann-Riem, Joye, Pohl, Wiesmann & Zemp. (2008). The Emergence of Transdisciplinarity as a Form of Research. (in: Hadorn, Biber-Klemm, Grossenbacher-Mansuy, Hoffmann-Riem, Joye, Pohl, Wiesmann & Zemp. Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research). Switzerland: Schwarztorstrasse 9. DOI:

Hall, K. L., Vogel, A. L., Huang, G. C., Serrano, K. J., Rice, E. L., Tsakraklides, S. P., et al. (2018). The science of team science: A review of the empirical evidence and research gaps on collaboration in science. American Psychologist, Vol. 73(532). 0319 DOI:

Hubert, B. & Bonnemaire, J. (2000), La construction des objets dans la recherche interdisciplinaire finalisée: de nouvelles exigences pour l’évaluation, Natural Science Society, 5-19. DOI:

Jahna, T., Bergmanna, M. & Keil, F. (2012). Transdisciplinarity: Between mainstreaming and marginalization. Ecological Economics, Vol. 79. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.017. DOI:

Jantsch, E. (1972). Towards Interdisciplinarity and Transdisciplinarity in Education and Innovation. In: L. Apostel et al. (eds.). Problems of Teaching and Research in Universities, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and Center for Educational Research and Innovation (CERI). Paris, pp. 97–121.

Kember, D. (1997). A reconceptualisation of the research into university academics’ conceptions of teaching. Learning and Instruction, 7. 255–275. DOI:

Kember, D., & Kwan-Por, K. (2000). Lecturers’ approaches to teaching and their relationship to conceptions of good teaching. Instructional Science, 28. 469–290. DOI:

Klein, J. T. (2017). “Typologies of interdisciplinarity: the boundary work of definition,” (in Frodeman, T. Klein, J.T. & Pacheco R.C.S. (eds). The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity. (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 21–34. DOI:

Knyazeva, E. (2011). Transdisciplinary Research Strategies. Vestnik ?GPU, Vol. 10 (112): 193-201.

Krütli*, P. Stauffacher, M., Flüeler & Scholz, R.W. (2010). Functional?dynamic public participation in technological decision?making: site selection processes of nuclear waste repositories. Journal of Risk Research, Vol. 13(7). 861–875. DOI:

McGregor, S.L.T. (2017). Challenges of Transdisciplinary Collaboration: A Conceptual Literature Review. Integral Leadership review. Feature Articles / April-June 2017

Mladenovici, V., Ilie, M.D. Maricu?oiu, L.P. & Iancu, D.E. (2021). Approaches to teaching in higher education: the perspective of network analysis using the revised approaches to teaching inventory. Higher Education, Vol. 84:255–277. DOI:

Mokiy, V. (2019). Systems Transdisciplinary Approach in the General Classification of Scientific Approaches. European Scientific Journal, Vol.15(19). 247-258. 10.19044/esj.2019.v15n19p247. DOI:

National Academies (eds). (2005). Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research, The National Academies Press, Washington, 306pp.

Nicolescu, B. (2002). Manifesto of Transdisciplinarity. New York: SUNY Press.

Parsons, T. (1968). The Structure of Social Action. Vols. I & II, The Free Press, New York, 775pp.

Petts, J. Owens, S. Bulkeley, H. (2008). Crossing Boundaries: Interdisciplinarity in the Context of Urban Environments. Geoforum, Vol. 39 (2), pp. 593-601. DOI:

Pohl, C. & Hirsch Hadorn, G. (2007). Principles for Designing Transdisciplinary Research. Switzerland: Oekom DOI:

Pohl, C., Krütli, P. & Stauffacher, M. (2017). Ten Reflective Steps for Rendering Research Societally Relevant. Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, Volume 26(1). 43-51. DOI:

Prosser, M., Martin, E., Trigwell, K., Ramsden, P., & Middleton, H. (2008). University academics’ experience of research and its relationship to their experience of teaching. Instructional Science, Vol. 36. 3–16. DOI:

Ramakrishna, S. 2022. Monodisciplinary-plus researchers: What and why? Drying Technology, Vol. 40(1). 1-4. DOI:

Smother, M. 2020. Transdisciplinary and interdisciplinary approaches. Best Practices, Resources, Teaching, Tips. 17, November 2020.

Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1996a). Congruence between intention and strategy in university science teachers’ approaches to teaching. Higher Education, Vol. 32(1), 77–87. DOI:

Udovychenko, L., Pyatnitska-Pozdnyakova, I., Skliar, I Pavliv, A & Fonariuk, O. (2022). A transdisciplinary approach to teaching and building a higher education system. Revista de Tecnología de Informacióny Comunicación en Educación. Vol. 16(3). 91-105. DOI:

Wahome, M., Hills, J. & Morgera, E. (2022). Towards Interdisciplinarity-Which Route to Take? From: 25.06.2023.

Weber, M. (1949). The Methodology of the Social Sciences (E.A. Shils and H.A. Finch, trans.), The Free Press, New York, 188pp.

Zafeirakopoulos, M. & van der Bijl-Brouwer, M. (2018). Exploring the Transdisciplinary Learning Experiences of Innovation Professionals. Technology Innovation Management Review. Vol. 8(8). 50-59. DOI:




How to Cite

Mashau, T. (2023). Promoting transdisciplinary teaching and learning and research in a world that is faced with multifaceted challenges. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478), 12(7), 523–531.



Teaching, Learning & Higher Education Institutions