Institutional development as a tool to facilitate economic access for South Africa’s SMEs: the case of the Development Bank of Southern Africa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v12i7.2727Keywords:
institutional development;, economic access, SMEs, historically disadvantaged, DBSAAbstract
The lack of economic access is one of the main challenges facing small and medium enterprises (SMEs). It contributes to the elevated levels of unemployment and slows the resolution of high inequality and poverty in South Africa. Economic access is the ability of historically disadvantaged individuals and entities to participate in the economy. This study aimed to explore how institutional development can support economic access for SMEs. The study explored how setting up new or improving existing socio-economic structures or legal entities could support economic access for SMEs. The support received by SMEs in South Africa from three institutions, the Independent Power Producer Office (IPPO), the Infrastructure Delivery Division (IDD) and the Development Laboratories (DLabs), set up by the Development Bank of Southern Africa (DBSA) was assessed. Quantitative data from the DBSA and IPPO, as well as qualitative views from informants, were used to assess the economic access of SMEs. The study shows that the IPPO, IDD and DLabs added value by achieving the objectives for which they were created. Furthermore, the results show that institutional development supports economic access for SMEs, and that this support is scalable. The study showed that institutional development could be a tool to support SMEs to participate in the economy. This study contributes to the body of knowledge on ways to support SMEs to grow and contribute to reducing unemployment, inequality and poverty.
Downloads
References
Ambler, K., Jones, K. & O'Sullivan, M. 2021. Facilitating women’s access to an economic empowerment initiative: evidence from Uganda. World Development, 138, 105224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105224 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105224
Azizi, A., Kumar, A., Van den Akker, E., Irmler, I. & Herold, J. 2016. Definition and Dimensions of Food Security, viewed on 21 November 2021 from https://wocatpedia.net/index.php?oldid=11583
Busetto, L., Wick, W. & Gumbinger, C. 2020. How to use and assess qualitative research methods. Neurological Research and Practice, 2(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-020-00059-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-020-00059-z
Churampi-Cangalaya, R., Inga-Ávila, M., Huamán-Pérez, F., Peña-Rojas, A., Churampi-Cangalaya, J. and Ulloa-Ninahuaman, J. 2023. Digital government, institutional development and public higher education. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 7(2), pp.865-872. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2023.1.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2023.1.002
Development Bank of Southern Africa (DBSA). 2010. Memorandum of agreement and mandate between the Department of Energy, the National Treasury and the Development Bank of Southern Africa, November. Internal copy.
Development Bank of Southern Africa (DBSA). 2013. DBSA Organisational Review Strategy Recommendations to the Board. Internal copy.
Development Bank of Southern Africa (DBSA). 2016. Memorandum of agreement between the Department of Energy, the National Treasury and the Development Bank of Southern Africa, July. Internal copy.
Development Bank of Southern Africa (DBSA). 2019. Memorandum of agreement between the Department of Energy, the National Treasury and the Development Bank of Southern Africa, December. Internal copy.
Development Bank of Southern Africa (DBSA). 2020. Memorandum of agreement between the Department of Mineral Resources and Energy, the National Treasury and the Development Bank of Southern Africa, November. Internal copy.
Development Bank of Southern Africa (DBSA). 2021. The DLab precinct model: creation of an ecosystem for community transitions. Report to the Board of the DBSA, May. Internal copy.
Development Bank of Southern Africa (DBSA). 2022. Corporate Plan 2022/23 – 2024/25, viewed on 6 February 2022 from https://www.dbsa.org/sites/default/files/media/documents/2022-06/Corporate%20Plan%202022-23%20to%2024-25.pdf
Development Bank of Southern Africa (DBSA). 2022a. Moonshots integrated progress report to the Board. February. Internal copy.
Eberhard, A. and Naude, R. 2012. The South African renewable energy IPP procurement programme: review, lessons learned & proposals to reduce transaction costs. South Africa: University of Cape Town, viewed on 16 April 2022 from https://www.gsb.uct.ac.za/files/EberhardNaude_REIPPPPReview_2017_1_1.pdf
European Centre for Development Policy Management (ECDPM). 2017. Booklet D, Institutional Development: Learning by Doing and Sharing, viewed on 12 May 2022 from https://www.ngoconnect.net/resource/institutional-development-learning-doing-and-sharing
Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO). 1983. The state of food and agriculture - world review: The situation in Sub-Saharan Africa - women in developing agriculture. FAO Agriculture Series No 16. https://doi.org/10.18356/8d5377a4-en DOI: https://doi.org/10.18356/8d5377a4-en
Githaiga, P.N. and Kilong’i, A.W. 2023. Foreign capital flow, institutional quality and human capital development in sub-Saharan Africa. Cogent Economics & Finance, 11(1), 2162689. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2162689 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2162689
Hodgson, G. M. 1998. The Approach of Institutional Economics. Journal of Economic Literature , 36(1), 166-192.
Hodgson, G. M. 2006. What are institutions?. Journal of economic issues, 40(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2006.11506879 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2006.11506879
Hoff, K. 2003. Paths of institutional development: a view from economic history. The World Bank Research Observer, 18(2), 205-226. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkg006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkg006
Independent Power Producer Office (IPPO). 2015. Independent Power Producers Procurement Programme – an overview, March. Internal copy.
Independent Power Producer Office (IPPO). 2022. IPP office institutionalisation status update - presentation to the DBSA Board, January. Internal copy.
Infrastructure Delivery Division (IDD). 2022. Division Annual Report to the Board of the Development Bank of Southern Africa, May. Internal copy.
Liu, L. and Zhang, M. 2018. High-speed rail impacts on travel times, accessibility, and economic productivity: a benchmarking analysis in city-cluster regions of China. Journal of Transport Geography, 73, 25-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.09.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.09.013
Lloyd, P. and Lee, C. 2018. A review of the recent literature on the institutional economics analysis of the long?run performance of nations. Journal of Economic Surveys, 32(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12186 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12186
McGill, R. 1995. Institutional development: a review of the concept. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 8(2), 63-79. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513559510086076 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513559510086076
McGill, R. 1996. Institutional development. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25071-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25071-4
Moore, M., Stewart, S. and Hudock, A. 1995. Institution building as a development assistance method - a review of literature and ideas. Swedish International Development Authority (SIDA) Report, viewed on 4 July 2022 from https://gsdrc.org/document-library/institution-building-as-a-development-assistance-method-a-review-of-literature-and-ideas/
Mzembe, A.N., Koens, K. and Calvi, L., 2023. The institutional antecedents of sustainable development in cultural heritage tourism. Sustainable Development. 31, 2196–2211. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2565 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2565
Nhleko, Z. (Unpublished). Public sector demand-led growth strategy for SMEs – validation from selected South African townships. PhD thesis, University of South Africa, Pretoria.
North, D.C. 1991. Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 97-112. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.5.1.97 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.5.1.97
Republic of South Africa. 1994. Government Gazette, 353(16085), viewed on 14 March 2022 from https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/governmentgazetteid16085.pdf
Republic of South Africa. 1997. Government Gazette, 382(17962), viewed on 26 March 2022 from https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/201409/act13of1997.pdf
Republic of South Africa. 2019. Government Gazette, 645(42304), viewed on 14 March 2022 from http://www.gpwonline.co.za/Gazettes/Gazettes/42304_15-3_NationalGovernment.pdf
Rodrik, D. and Subramanian, A. 2003. The primacy of institutions. Finance and Development, 40(2), 31-34, viewed on 22 June 2022 from https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2003/06/pdf/rodrik.pdf
Sari, V. K. and Prasetyani, D. 2021. The impact of the institution on economic growth: an evidence from ASEAN. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan, 19(1), 17-26. https://doi.org/10.29259/jep.v19i1.12793 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29259/jep.v19i1.12793
Simin, M. T., Mili?, D. D., Petrovi?, M., Glavaš-Trbi?, D., Komaromi, B., & ?uri?, K. (2023). Institutional development of organic farming in the EU. Problemy Ekorozwoju/Problems of Sustainable Development, 18(1), 120-128. https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2023.1.12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2023.1.12
Small Enterprise Development Agency (SEDA). 2021. SMME Quarterly Update – 1st Quarter 2021. August, viewed on 3 June 2022 from http://www.seda.org.za/Publications/Publications/SMME%20Quarterly%202021%20Q1%20September.pdf
The Presidency – South Africa. 2020. Task Team on National Township and Rural Economies Development Framework. Internal copy.
U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). 1995. Food aid and food security policy paper. Bureau for Program and Policy Coordination. February, viewed on 9 September 2022 from https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/Pnabu219.pdf
Veblen, T. 1912. The theory of the leisure class: an economic study of institutions. London: MacMillan and Co. Ltd.
Wachs, M. and Kumagai, T. G. 1973. Physical accessibility as a social indicator. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 7(5), 437-456. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0121(73)90041-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0121(73)90041-4
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Zeph Nhleko, Watson Ladzani, Solly Seeletse
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
For all articles published in IJRBS, copyright is retained by the authors. Articles are licensed under an open access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download and read the paper for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted provided that the original published version is cited. These conditions allow for maximum use and exposure of the work, while ensuring that the authors receive proper credit.
