The influence of shared vision on organizational ambidexterity in coffee marketing co-operative societies in Kenya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v12i6.2689Keywords:
Organizational ambidexterity, coffee production, employment, shared vision, Ambidexterity Leadership, Entrepreneurial leadership, coffee marketingAbstract
Coffee production in Kenya has plummeted, hurting the economy and worsening social inequality and poverty. Kenyan coffee marketing cooperative associations have failed to boost exports. Coffee is Kenya's main cash crop. Coffee is the country's principal foreign exchange earner, rural employment source, food security source, and revenue source. The reduction in coffee export earnings shows that coffee marketing cooperatives are inefficient and less flexible. This study examines how shared vision affects organizational ambidexterity. This transformational leadership-based study used exploratory and cross-sectional survey methodologies. The target audience was Kenyan coffee marketing cooperatives. The sample size was 242 Kenyan coffee marketing cooperative societies. A self-administered, semi-structured questionnaire collected primary data from cooperative society managers. The data was analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Results show that shared vision favorably impacts organizational ambidexterity (R = 0.547, R2 = 0.299), explaining 29.9% of variation. Further, shared vision significantly affected organizational ambidexterity (P-value = 0.00). The study found that shared vision affected organizational ambidexterity. Thus, managers of coffee marketing cooperative societies should constantly discuss their vision with other employees to improve ambidexterity.
Downloads
References
Adler, P. S., Goldoftas, B., & Levine, D. I. (1999). Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system. Organization Science, 10(1), 43–68. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.1.43 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.1.43
Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. (1994). Changing the role of top management: Beyond strategy to purpose. Harvard Business Review, 72(6), 79-88.
Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving Organizational Effectiveness Through Transformational Leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Burns, J. M. (1985). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
Chebbi, H., Yahiaoui, D., Vrontis, D., & Thrassou, A. (2017). The impact of ambidextrous leadership on the internationalization of emerging market firms: The case of India. Thunderbird International Business Review, 59(3), 421–436. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.21882 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.21882
Chengappa, P. G., Karl, R., Muniyappa, A., Ganashruthi, M., Babu, P., Shubha, Y. C., & Magda Rich. (2014). Sustainable coffee certification in India. Norwegian: Norwegian Institute of International Affairs.
Clauss, T., Kraus, S., Kallinger, F. L., Bican, P. M., Brem, A., & Kailer, N. (2020). Organizational ambidexterity and competitive advantage: The role of strategic agility in the exploration-exploitation paradox. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2020.07.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2020.07.003
Conger, J. A. (1999). Charismatic and transformational leadership in organizations: An insider’s perspective on these developing streams of research. Leadership Quarterly, 10, 145–179. http://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(99)00012-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(99)00012-0
Diaz-Fernandez, M., Pasamar-Reyes, S., & Valle-Cabrera, R. (2017). Human capital and human resource management to achieve ambidextrous learning: A structural perspective. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 20(1), 63-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2016.03.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2016.03.002
Farmers Africa Review. (2023). Natural Coffee Processing Increases Kenyan Smallholders Earnings Six-Times In Global Market.
Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G., & Shalley, C. E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 693-706. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.22083026
Han, M., & Celly, N. (2008). Strategic Ambidexterity and Performance in International New Ventures. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 25, 335-349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.84
Heavey, C., & Simsek, Z. (2017). Distributed cognition in top management teams and organizational ambidexterity: The influence of transactive memory systems. Journal of Management, 43(3), 919–945. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314545652
Hudson, L. A., & Ozanne, J. L. (1988). Alternative Ways of Seeking Knowledge in Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(March), 508-521. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/209132
Hughes, P., Hughes, M., Stokes, P., Lee, H., Rodgers, P., & Degbey, W. Y. (2020). Micro-foundations of organizational ambidexterity in the context of cross-border mergers and acquisitions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 153, 119932. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119932
International Coffee Organization. (2014). World Coffee Trade (1963 – 2013). A review of the markets, challenges, and opportunities facing the sector.
Jansen, J. (2005). Ambidextrous Organizations: A Multiple-Level Study of Absorptive Capacity, Exploratory and Exploitative Innovation, and Performance (Unpublished Dissertation). ERIM. https://ep.eur.nl/handle/1765/6774
Jansen, J. J. P., George, G., Van den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2008). Senior Team Attributes and Organizational Ambidexterity: The Moderating Role of Transformational Leadership. Journal of Management Studies, 45(5), 982-1007. https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/4677 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00775.x
Jansen, J. J. P., Van den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2005). Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation, and Ambidexterity: The Impact of Environmental and Organizational Antecedents. Schmalenbach Business Review, 57, 351-363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03396721
Kathurima, C. (2016). Coffee Quality Management. Nairobi: Kenya Agriculture and Livestock Research Institute.
Kevin, F., Shimon, S., Elijah, H., & Leah, K. P. (2017). How Important is High Response Rates for College Surveys? The Review of Higher Education, 40(2), 245-265. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2017.0003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2017.0003
Lubatkin, M. H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y., & Veiga, J. F. (2006). Ambidexterity and Performance in Small- to Medium-Sized Firms: The Pivotal Role of Top Management Team Behavioral Integration. Journal of Management, 32, 646-672. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206306290712
McCormack, B., Wright, J., Dewar, B., Harvey, G., & Ballantine, K. (2007). A realist synthesis of evidence relating to practice development: Findings from the literature analysis. Practice Development in Health Care, 6(1), 25-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pdh.211
Mom, T. J. M., Chang, Y.-Y., Cholakova, M., & Jansen, J. J. P. (2019). A multilevel integrated framework of firm HR practices, individual ambidexterity, and organizational ambidexterity. Journal of Management, 45(7), 3009–3034. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318776775
Mude, A. (2006). Weaknesses in Institutional Organization: Explaining the Dismal Performance of Kenya’s Coffee Cooperatives. Paper Presented at International Association of Agricultural Economists Conference. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/9781845932695.0033
Mukerezi, A. K. (2013). Profitability Analysis and Strategic Planning of Coffee Processing and Marketing in Rwanda: A Case Study of a Coffee Growers’ Association. Unpublished M. Sc. thesis, Michigan State University.
Muriithi, L. W. (2016). Impact of Coffee Certification on Small Holder Coffee Farming in Embu County, Kenya. Research Thesis, Kenyatta University.
Mwangi, A. M., & Karanja, N. (2014). Influence of entrepreneurial orientation on growth of micro and small enterprises in Kerugoya, Kenya. European Journal of Business Management, 1(11).
Northouse, P. G. (2013). Leadership: Theory and Practice (3rd ed.). London: Sage Publications Ltd.
O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185–206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2008.06.002
Palazzeschi, L., Bucci, O., & Fabio, A. Di. (2018). High entrepreneurship, leadership, and professionalism (HELP): A new resource for workers in the 21st century. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1480. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01480
Pangarso, A., Astuti, E. S., Raharjo, K., & Afrianty, T. W. (2020). The impact of absorptive capacity and innovation ambidexterity on sustainable competitive advantage: The case of Indonesian higher education. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7(3), 2436. http://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2020.7.3(65) DOI: https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2020.7.3(65)
Raisch, S., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management, 34, 375–409. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316058
Republic of Kenya (2007). The Co-operative Societies Rules, 200. Nairobi: Government Printer.
Utami, A. K., & Wilopo, S. (2018). Effect of entrepreneurial orientation toward competitive advantage and business performance. Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences, 79(7). DOI: https://doi.org/10.18551/rjoas.2018-07.15
Venugopal, A., Krishnan, T. N., Upadhyayula, R. S., & Kumar, M. (2020). Finding the microfoundations of organizational ambidexterity: Demystifying the role of top management behavioral integration. Journal of Business Research, 106, 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.08.049
Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: An Introductory Analysis (2nd Edition). New York: Harper and Row.
Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in Organizations (8th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Zang, J., & Li, Y. (2017). Technology capabilities, marketing capabilities, and innovation ambidexterity. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 29(1), 23-37. http://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2016.1194972. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2016.1194972
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Hesbon Mbuthia Kiura , Kenneth Wanjau, Richard Kiai
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
For all articles published in IJRBS, copyright is retained by the authors. Articles are licensed under an open access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download and read the paper for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted provided that the original published version is cited. These conditions allow for maximum use and exposure of the work, while ensuring that the authors receive proper credit.