The Impact of Audit Committee Characteristics on Environmental and Social Disclosures

Evidence from Turkey

Authors

  • Ali Altuğ Biçer
  • Imad Mohamed Feneir The Higher Institute for Administrative and Financial Sciences -Benghazi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v8i3.262

Keywords:

Audit Committe, AC Size, AC Meetings, AC Expertise, Environmental Disclosure, Social Disclosure

Abstract

The main reasons for corporate participation in environmental and social disclosure are stability, development, and continuity through participation in protecting the environment and optimizing the use of available resources. As well as the company practices and participation in society of the most important means to create a good image of the company in the community. There is a rise demand for companies to take accountability for their environmental and societal impacts. A core role of the Audit Committee (AC) is to help the board of directors in overseeing the company's reporting policy and oversees the quality of financial reporting in the company. This study examined the impact of audit committee characteristics on the level of environmental and social disclosures in listed banks in Borsa Istanbul. The results of the study showed that there is no statistically significant relationship between the characteristics of the audit committee and the environmental and social disclosures. Consequently, these characteristics have no effect on the volume or type of disclosure and their inability to predict them.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abbott, L. J., Parker, S. & Peters, G. F.( 2004). Audit Committee Characteristics and Restatements. Auditing a Journal of Practice and Theory, 23, 69-87.

Appuhami, R and Tashakor, S. (2017). The Impact of Audit Committee Characteristics on CSR Disclosure: An Analysis of Australian Firms. Australian Accounting Review No. 83 Vol. 27 Issue 4.

Ball, A., Owen, D.L. and Gray, R. (2000). External Transparency or Internal Capture? The Role of Third Party Statements in Adding Value to Corporate Environmental Reports. Business Strategy and the Environment, 9 (1): 1–23.

Beasley, M., Carcello, J., Hermanson, D. & Neal, T.(2009). The Audit Committee Oversight Process. Contemporary Accounting Research, 26, 65-122.

Bowerman, S. and Sharma, U. P. (2016). The effect of corporate social responsibility disclosures on share prices in Japan and the UK, Corporate Ownership & Control, Volume 13, Issue 2.

Brennan, N. M. and Solomon, J. (2008). Corporate Governance, Accountability and Mechanisms of Accountability: An Overview. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21, 885 - 906.

Bromark, Ray and Hoffman, Ralph (1992). An Audit Committee For Dynamic Times, Directors and Boards, pp.51-60.

Brown, T.J. and Dacin, P.A. (1997), The Company and the Product: Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Responses, Journal of Marketing, 61 (1): 68–84.

Brooks, C. and Oikonomou, I. (2017). The Effects of Environmental, Social and Governance Disclosures and Performance on Firm Value: A Review of The Literature in Accounting and Finance. The British Accounting Review. 50(1), 1-15

Catikkas, O. and Alpaslan, Halil I.(2003). Effectiveness of Audit Committees in the Turkish Banking Sector. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Vol 2 No 11.

Chen, G., Firth, M., Gao, D. N. & Rui, O. M. (2006). Ownership Structure, Corporate Governance, and Fraud: Evidence from China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12, 424– 448.

Choi, B.B., Lee, D. and Park, Y. (2013), Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Governance, and Earnings Quality: Evidence from Korea, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21 (5), pp. 67- 447.

DeZoort, F., Hermanson, D., & Houston, R. (2003). Audit Committee Member Support for Proposed Audit Adjustments: A Source Credibility Perspective. Auditing. Journal of Practice & Theory, 22(2), 189-205.

Ghafran, C., and O’Sullivan, N. (2013). The Governance Role of Audit Committees: Reviewing a Decade of Evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15, 381-407.

Gray, R., Owen, D. and Adams, C. (1996). Accounting & Accountability: Changes and Challenges in corporate Social and Environmental Reporting, Prentice Hall.

Gujarati, D. N. (2003). Basic Econometrics. McGraw-Hill, 4 Ed.

Heemskerk, B., Pistorio, P. and Scicluna, M. (2002). Sustainable development reporting: Striking the balance, World Business Council for Sustainable Development.

Jamali, D., Safieddine, A.M. and Rabbath, M. (2008). Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility Synergies and Interrelationships, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16 (5): 443–59.

Karamanou, I. and Vafeas, N. (2005), The Association between Corporate Boards, Audit Committees, and Management Earnings Forecasts: An Empirical Analysis, Journal of Accounting Research, 43 (3): 453–86.

Kennedy, P. 2008. A guide to econometrics. Blackwell Publishing, 6 ed.

Keune, M., & Johnstone, K. (2012). Materiality Judgments and the Resolution of Detected Misstatements: The Role of Managers, Auditors, and Audit Committees. The Accounting Review, 87(5), 1641-1677.

Khlif, H., & Samaha, K. (2014). Internal control quality, Egyptian standards on auditing and external audit delays: Evidence from the Egyptian Stock Exchange. International Journal of Auditing, 18(2), 139–154.

Kolk, A., & Pinkse, J. (2010). The Integration of Corporate Governance in Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosures. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17(1), 15-26.

Li, J., Pike, R. & Haniffa, R. (2008). Intellectual Capital Disclosure and Corporate Governance Structure in UK Firms. Accounting and Business Research, 38, 137–159.

Lin, Z. J., Xiao, J. Z. and Tang, Q. (2008). The roles, responsibilities, and characteristics of audit committee in China. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(5), 721-751.

Magena, M. & Pike, R. (2005). The Effect of Audit Committee Shareholding, Financial Expertise, and Size on Interim Financial Disclosure. Accounting and Business Research, 35, 327-349.

Moravcikova, K., Stefanikova, L. and Rypakova, M. (2015). CSR Reporting as an Important tool of CSR communication. Procedia Economics and Finance, 26, 332-338.

Najah, A. and Jarboui, A. (2013). The Social Disclosure Impact on Corporate Financial Performance: Case of Big French Companies, International Journal of Business Management and Research, 3 (4), 337-351.

Nekhili, M., Nagati, H., Chtioui, T. and Rebolledo, C. (2017). Corporate social responsibility disclosure and market value: Family versus nonfamily firms. Journal of Business Research, 77, 41-52.

Persons, O. S. (2009). Audit committee characteristics and earlier voluntary ethics disclosure among fraud and no-fraud firms. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 6 (4), 284-297.

Persons, O. S. (2009). Audit committee characteristics and earlier voluntary ethics disclosure among fraud and no-fraud firms. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 6 (4), 284-297.

Plumlee, M., Brown, D., Hayes, R. M. and Marshall, R. S. (2015). Voluntary environmental disclosure quality and firm value: Further evidence. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 34, 336-361.

Smith, R. (2003). Audit Committees Combined Code Guidance, the Financial Reporting Council Limited.

Tabachnick, B. & Fidell, L. (2014). Using Multivariate Statistics. Pearson New International Edition. Harlow, 6 Ed.

Downloads

Published

2019-05-10

How to Cite

Biçer, A. A., & Feneir, I. M. (2019). The Impact of Audit Committee Characteristics on Environmental and Social Disclosures: Evidence from Turkey. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478), 8(3), 111–121. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v8i3.262