Risk Management Practices and Performance for Regenerative Agriculture

Authors

  • Ndateba Emmanuel
  • Amolo Elvis Juma Amolo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20525/ijfbs.v14i1.4027

Keywords:

Risk Management Practices, risk identification, risk analysis, risk response, risk review and control, performance of agricultural projects

Abstract

Agricultural projects are vital to improving livelihoods, especially in developing countries like Rwanda. In the face of climate variability, pest outbreaks, and economic challenges, agricultural projects need comprehensive strategies to identify, assess, and mitigate risks. Despite the importance of risk management in agricultural projects, many initiatives in Rwanda struggle to sustain positive outcomes due to inadequate risk identification, planning, and response strategies, hindering agricultural productivity and economic growth. The purpose of the study was to assess the effect of risk management practices and performance of agricultural projects in Rwanda: a case of regenerative agriculture for livelihoods and markets project. The study used decision making theory and the theory of change. The target population was 432 REALMs project stakeholders from which a sample of 157 was taken to attend closed ended questionnaire and focus group discussion. The study used Stratified sampling, simple random sampling and Purposive sampling for selection of respondents. The researcher conducted a pilot study on 20 respondents which represent 12.7% of the sample size. Content Validity Index was 0.90 and the overall reliability coefficient was 0.85 for all items. Data analysis involved descriptive and inferential statistics of correlation and regression analyzed by SPSS version 28. The findings for four hypotheses were tested at ?=.05 level of significance and the results were: risk identification (p=0.000<0.05); risk analysis (p=0.000<0.05); risk response (p=0.000<0.05) and; risk review and control (p=0.000<0.05) have no significant effect on performance of agricultural projects in Rwanda; were rejected, confirming that the risk management strategies have significant effect on performance of agricultural projects. The study revealed that there is significant effect of risk management practices performance of agricultural projects in Rwanda. It is recommended that beneficiaries of the REALMS project and similar initiatives remain actively engaged in risk management practices. Regular risk assessments, stakeholder collaboration, and adaptive risk responses are crucial for maintaining project success. Recommendations to future researchers focus on the fact that, future studies should explore the influence of socioeconomic factors, such as gender and education, on the effectiveness of risk management strategies. Understanding how these variables affect the adoption and implementation of risk practices will provide more tailored recommendations for improving agricultural outcomes and ensuring greater inclusivity in agricultural development projects. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arora, G. (2020). Agricultural risk management amidst stagnant rural incomes and unequal credit access: Historical context and new empirical evidence from semi-arid smallholder Indian farms. Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology, Delhi (IIIT-Delhi).

Birthal. (2021). Effectiveness of Farmers’ Risk Management Strategies in Smallholder Agriculture: Evidence from India. ICAR-National Institute of Agricultural Economics and Policy Research, New Delhi, 110 012, India.

Giertz, A. (2022). Publication: Rwanda Agricultural Sector Risk Assessment. Kigali, Rwanda: World Bank, Washington, DC.

Goswami, K. (2021). Progress in agricultural vulnerability and risk research in India: a systematic review. Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, West Bengal, 721302, India.

Granberg. (2023). Scientific-Technical Theories of Risk. The Centre for Societal Risk Research, Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden.

Habimana, J. (2023). Risk Management and Agricultural Project Performance: Evidence from Rwandan Coffee Sector. nternational Journal of Agricultural Policy and Research.

Hammond. (2023). The Macy Conferences: A historical milestone in the development of cybernetics and systems thinking. The Society for General Systems Research (SGSR).

Hitamungu. (2023). Impact of risk management on agriculture projects’ success in Rwanda: A case of farmer field school Project in Kamonyi district, Rwanda. Mount Kenya University, Rwanda: International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 13, Issue 7, July 2023.

Karenzi. (2024). Training to public extension services, local community organizations and private or NGO extension. Kigali, Rwanda: Rwanda Development Organization. Developed By Geoffrey Karenzi.

Mulyungi, P. (2023). Effect of Risk Management Strategies on Performance of Agricultural Projects in Rwanda - A Case Study of Access to Finance Rwanda (AFR). International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR).

Ndayambaje, E. (2022). Risk Management in Rwandan Agriculture: Challenges and Opportunities. Journal of Risk Management in Agriculture.

Roger, E. (2023). Risk, Reward, and Resilience Framework: Integrative Policy Making in a Complex World. Journal of International Economic Law, Volume 26, Issue 2, June 2023, Pages 233–265, https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgad009.

The Republic of Uganda. (2022). Uganda Climate Smart Agricultural Transformation (UCSAT) Project - P173296. Stakeholder Engagement Framework: Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industry and Fisheries.

Umugwaneza. (2024). Project Implementation Phases and Performance of Agricultural Projects in Rwanda. A Case of N2Africa Project/ CIATin Kamonyi District. School of Business and Economics, Business Administration (MBA): Journal of Advance Research in Business Management and Accounting.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-03

How to Cite

Emmanuel , N., & Amolo, A. E. J. (2025). Risk Management Practices and Performance for Regenerative Agriculture . International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies (2147-4486), 14(1), 111–120. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijfbs.v14i1.4027