Project Management Practices and the Implementation of Innovative Medical Drone Delivery Systems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20525/ijfbs.v14i2.4022Keywords:
Project Management Practices, human resource management, stakeholder management, risk management, communication management, implementation of innovative medical delivery projectsAbstract
The Zipline medical drone delivery project in Rwanda exemplifies how innovative logistics can transform healthcare access by ensuring rapid and reliable delivery of blood, vaccines, and other critical supplies to remote areas. While such projects enhance healthcare efficiency and save lives, their success depends on effective project management practices, including human resource management, stakeholder coordination, risk mitigation, and communication strategies. This study examined the influence of these factors on the implementation of the Zipline project, using a descriptive and correlational research design grounded in Systems Theory and Innovation Diffusion Theory. The research involved 65 key stakeholders, including project managers, engineers, healthcare providers, and government officials, with data collected through questionnaires, interviews, and document reviews. The results demonstrated that human resource management significantly impacts project success (p = 0.000), emphasizing the need for skilled personnel and efficient team coordination. Stakeholder management also played a critical role (p = 0.000), highlighting the importance of collaboration among government agencies, healthcare providers, and local communities. Additionally, proactive risk management (p = 0.000) was essential for addressing operational challenges, while effective communication (p = 0.000) ensured clarity and alignment among all parties. These findings underscore the interconnectedness of these management practices in achieving timely and efficient medical supply delivery. The study recommends further research into the long-term sustainability and scalability of such projects, considering regional and cultural factors that may influence their success. By addressing these key management dimensions, similar initiatives can be optimized to maximize their impact on healthcare systems, particularly in underserved regions. The insights from this research provide valuable guidance for policymakers and project implementers seeking to leverage drone technology and other innovations to improve global healthcare delivery.
Downloads
References
Aas, S., Brege, S., & Haug, A. (2020). Stakeholder Engagement in Innovation Projects: The Importance of Early Involvement. International Journal of Project Management, 38(3), 175-185.
Agyeman, K. (2020). Scaling innovative healthcare projects in Africa: The role of management practices in Zipline's success in Ghana. Journal of African Health Solutions, 7(2), 56-72.
Brown, S., & Wilson, T. (2022). The importance of planning, risk management, and stakeholder involvement in innovative projects. Journal of Project Innovation, 12(3), 145-160.
Fernández, A., López, C., & Martinez, R. (2022). Training and Development in Risk Management: Enhancing Project Resilience. International Journal of Project Management, 40(5), 475-486.
Green, P. (2021). Tesla’s Gigafactory: A case study in successful project management. Global Project Management Journal, 10(2), 78-92.
Gupta, A., Patel, S., & Reddy, K. (2022). The Role of Digital Communication Tools in Project Management: A Study of Emerging Technologies. Journal of Digital Transformation in Project Management, 15(3), 89-105.
Hamed, M. (2021). DabaDoc’s innovation in healthcare through project execution and collaboration. HealthTech Africa, 5(1), 65-80.
Johnson, R., & Turner, G. (2022). Impact of Effective Communication on Public Sector Projects: A Comparative Study of Innovative Initiatives. Journal of Public Sector Innovation, 16(1), 110-125.
Khan, A., Rahman, F., & Karim, M. (2022). The Impact of Risk Management Practices on Project Outcomes: A Sectoral Analysis. Journal of Risk Management in Engineering, 11(2), 215-230.
Lee, Y., & Park, J. (2023). Cross-Functional Communication in Innovative Projects: A Case Study of Drone Technology in Healthcare. Journal of Innovation and Project Success, 10(2), 145-160.
Ministry of Health. (2021). Resource allocation and management in healthcare innovation: A case study of Zipline's medical drone delivery service in Rwanda. Government of Rwanda
Ngoga, P. (2020). The impact of Zipline’s planning and resource management on project success in Rwanda. African Healthcare Projects, 15(2), 120-135.
Ntirenganya, T. (2021). Goal setting and planning in innovative healthcare delivery projects: The case of Zipline's medical drone service in Rwanda. Journal of Project Management and Healthcare Innovation, 10(3), 45-58.
Project Management Institute. (2021). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide) (7th ed.). Project Management Institute.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Niyonshuti Francois, Amolo Elvis Juma Amolo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to IJFBS agree to publish their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution- 4.0 license, allowing third parties to share their work (copy, distribute, transmit) and to adapt it, under the condition that the authors are given credit, that the work is not used for commercial purposes, and that in the event of reuse or distribution, the terms of this license are made clear. Authors retain copyright of their work, with first publication rights granted to IJFBS. However, authors are required to transfer copyrights associated with commercial use to the Publisher. The authors agree to the terms of this Copyright Notice, which will apply to this submission if and when it is published by this journal
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously( except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, it will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other languages, without the written consent of the Publisher. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication.
