Stakeholder Engagement Strategies on Agricultural Project Performance
A Case Study Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20525/ijfbs.v14i2.4021Keywords:
Stakeholders’ Engagement Strategies, collaboration strategy, Involvement Strategy, Empowerment Strategy, Consultation Strategy, Performance of Agricultural ProjectsAbstract
Stakeholder engagement is a critical determinant of project success, with ineffective strategies contributing to failures worldwide. Despite some progress, research remains scarce on the specific strategies contributing to sustainable outcomes in Rwanda. The purpose of the study was to assess the effect of stakeholders' engagement strategies on performance of agricultural projects in Rutsiro District, Rwanda: A Case of KOICA Project. The Specific objectives of the study include: To assess the effect of collaboration, involvement, empowerment and consultation strategy on performance of agricultural projects in Rutsiro District, Rwanda. The study was grounded on Stakeholder Theory. The study used descriptive and correlational research design. The target population includes 2,179 stakeholders from KOICA, with a sample size of 338 respondents. The pilot study aimed to enhance the validity and reliability of the research tools by pre-testing the questionnaire and interview guide with 34 respondents, representing 10% of the sample size. Validity was confirmed through expert evaluation, yielding a content validity index of 0.89 while Reliability was established using the split-half technique, achieving a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.84, demonstrating the instruments' consistency and appropriateness for data collection. Descriptive statistics of percentage, frequency, mean and standard deviation and inferential statistics of Correlation and Regression were done at a significance level of 0.05 using SPSS version 28 while thematic content analysis of qualitative data was done for triangulation. The findings for four hypotheses were tested at ?=.05 level of significance and the results were: Collaboration Strategy (P=0.000<0.05), Involvement Strategy (P=0.000<0.05), Empowerment Strategy (P=0.000<0.05) and, Consultation Strategy (P=0.000<0.05) on Performance of Agricultural Projects were rejected. The study concludes that the performance of agricultural projects in Rutsiro District is significantly influenced by collaboration, involvement, empowerment, and consultation strategies. To enhance project outcomes, the study recommends developing structured frameworks for resource sharing, fostering participatory decision-making, expanding capacity-building programs, and strengthening feedback mechanisms to improve stakeholder engagement and inclusivity.
Downloads
References
Almeida, F., Monteiro, J. M., & Lima, R. (2020). Stakeholder management influence on project performance: A systematic review of the literature. Project Management Journal, 51(6), 650–666.
Chigudu, D. (2020). The public sector and governance in sub-Saharan Africa: An analysis of stakeholder engagement in public procurement. Public Administration and Development. Public Administration and Development, 40(2), 91-101.
CreswelL, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman.
Global Construction Perspectives. (2022). Global Construction 2030. Global Construction Perspectives and Oxford Economics.
Kamara, J. (2017). Stakeholder Influence in Rural Development Projects: A Case of Sierra Leone. Journal of Rural Studies, 55, 203-215.
Kerzner, H. (2017). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. Hoboken,: NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
KOICA. (2019). KOICA Annual Report 2019. Korea International Cooperation.
Liu, J., Zhang, H., & Wu, H. (2021). Collaboration in agricultural projects: Impacts on resource utilization and sustainability. Sustainability, 13(5), 2775.
Memon, A. H. (2019). Contractor project performance for public sector construction projects in Pakistan: Factors of success. International Journal of Construction Management, 19(5), 445–456.
PMI. (2021). Pulse of the Profession. Project Management Institute.
RDB. (2020). Annual Report 2020. Rwanda Development Board.
Saha, A., & Banerjee, S. (2021). Sustainable agricultural practices through stakeholder consultation: Challenges and opportunities in developing regions. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 43(1), 35–52.
Simpson, G., Wood, S., & Dyer, T. (2022). Empowerment as a driver of sustainable rural development: Insights from small-scale farmers in developing countries. Sustainability, 14(3), 865–882.
Zizka, L., Riebe, E., & Mertens, D. (2021). Stakeholder engagement and marginalized groups in project management: The case of smallholder farmers in Africa. Journal of Rural Studies, 82, 98–109.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Bazigama Aphrodis Ufitimfura , Amolo Elvis Juma Amolo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to IJFBS agree to publish their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution- 4.0 license, allowing third parties to share their work (copy, distribute, transmit) and to adapt it, under the condition that the authors are given credit, that the work is not used for commercial purposes, and that in the event of reuse or distribution, the terms of this license are made clear. Authors retain copyright of their work, with first publication rights granted to IJFBS. However, authors are required to transfer copyrights associated with commercial use to the Publisher. The authors agree to the terms of this Copyright Notice, which will apply to this submission if and when it is published by this journal
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously( except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, it will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other languages, without the written consent of the Publisher. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication.
