A Two-Period Decision Model for Central Bank Digital Currencies and Households


  • Guizhou Wang
  • Kjell Hausken University of Stavanger




Central bank, digital currency, transaction efficiency, decision theory, inflation, economic shocks


Central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) give rise to many possibilities including those of negative interest rates. A two-period decision model is presented between one central bank and one representative household. The central bank applies the Taylor (1993) rule to choose its interest rate. The household allocates its resources strategically to production, consumption, CBDC holding, and non-CBDC holding. The results are determined analytically and illustrated numerically by varying 19 parameter values. Interesting novelties of the article are that the central bank may choose negative CBDC interest rates when the household holds far more CBDC than non-CBDC, for low inflation rates, low real interest rates, low household’s potential production, low weight assigned to inflation in the Taylor (1993) rule, high target inflation rate, and high household’s production parameter. That usually causes the household to decrease its CBDC holding and increase its non-CBDC holding, production and consumption. The central bank may increase its CBDC interest rate to compete with an increasing non-CBDC interest rate if the household’s transaction efficiencies for CBDC and non-CBDC increase, or the household’s transaction efficiency for consumption decreases. Shocks to production, inflation and interest rates are analyzed.


Download data is not yet available.


Agur, I., Ari, A., & Dell’Ariccia, G. (2021). Designing Central Bank Digital Currencies. Journal of Monetary Economics, 125, 62-79, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2021.05.002

Allen, S., ?apkun, S., Eyal, I., Fanti, G., Ford, B. A., Grimmelmann, J., . . . Zhang, F. (2020). Design Choices for Central Bank Digital Currency: Policy and Technical Considerations. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper. No.w27634, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge.

Assenmacher, K., & Krogstrup, S. (2021). Monetary Policy with Negative Interest Rates: De-linking Cash from Digital Money. International Journal of Central Banking, 17(1), 67-106.

Auer, R., & Böhme, R. (2020). The Technology of Retail Central Bank Digital Currency. Bank for International Settlements Quarterly Review. Basel.

Beniak, P. (2019). Central Bank Digital Currency and Monetary Policy: A Literature Review. Manuscript. University Library of Munich, Munich.

Bhimani, A., Hausken, K., & Arif, S. (2022). Do National Development Factors Affect Cryptocurrency Adoption? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 181, Article number 121739, https://doi.org/121710.121016/j.techfore.122022.121739.

Bindseil, U. (2020). Tiered CBDC and the Financial System. Manuscript. European Central Bank, Frankfurt.

Bindseil, U., & Fabio, P. (2020). CBDC Remuneration in a World With Low or Negative Nominal Interest Rates. Manuscript. European Central Bank, Frankfurt.

Blanke, J., & Krogstrup, S. (2016). Negative Interest Rates: Absolutely Everything You Need to Know. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/11/negative-interest-rates-absolutely-everything-you-need-to-know/

Boar, C., & Wehrli, A. (2021). Ready, Steady, Go? - Results of the Third BIS Survey on Central Bank Digital Currency. Bank for International Settlements Papers. No.114, Bank for International Settlements, Basel.

Borio, C., & Zabai, A. (2018). Unconventional Monetary Policies: A Re-Appraisal. In P. Conti-Brown & R. M. Lastra (Eds.), Research Handbook on Central Banking (pp. 398–444). Cheltenham, Great Britain: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Böser, F., & Gersbach, H. (2020). Monetary Policy with a Central Bank Digital Currency: the Short and the Long Term. Centre for Economic Policy Research Working Paper. DP15322, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London.

Bougheas, S. (1994). Asset and Currency Prices in an Exchange Economy with Transactions Costs. Journal of Macroeconomics, 16(1), 99-107. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0164-0704(94)90046-9

Choi, K. J., Henry, R., Lehar, A., Reardon, J., & Safavi-Naini, R. (2021). A Proposal for a Canadian CBDC. Manuscript. University of Calgary, Calgary.

Czudaj, R. L. (2020). Is the Negative Interest Rate Policy Effective? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 174, 75-86. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2020.03.031

Davoodalhosseini, M., Rivadeneyra, F., & Zhu, Y. (2020). CBDC and Monetary Policy. Manuscript. Bank of Canada, Ottawa.

Davoodalhosseini, S. M. (2021). Central Bank Digital Currency and Monetary Policy. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 104150. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2021.104150

Feenstra, R. C. (1986). Functional Equivalence Between Liquidity Costs and the Utility of Money. Journal of Monetary Economics, 17(2), 271-291. doi:10.1016/0304-3932(86)90032-2

Ferrero, G., & Neri, S. (2017). Monetary Policy in a Low Interest Rate Environment. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3056267 , http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3056267 Bank of Italy Occasional Paper No. 392

Grasselli, M. R., & Lipton, A. (2019). On the Normality of Negative Interest Rates. Review of Keynesian Economics, 7(2), 201-219. doi:DOI:10.4337/ROKE.2019.02.06

Jia, P. (2020). Negative Interest Rates on Central Bank Digital Currency. Manuscript. Nanjing University, Nanjing.

Kiff, J., Alwazir, J., Davidovic, S., Farias, A., Khan, A., Khiaonarong, T., . . . Zhou, P. (2020). A Survey of Research on Retail Central Bank Digital Currency. International Monetary Fund Working Paper. No. 20/104, International Monetary Fund, Washington.

Lee, D. K. C., Yan, L., & Wang, Y. (2021). A Global Perspective on Central Bank Digital Currency. China Economic Journal, 14(1), 52-66. doi:10.1080/17538963.2020.1870279

Meaning, J., Dyson, B., Barker, J., & Claytona, E. (2021). Broadening Narrow Money: Monetary Policy with a Central Bank Digital Currency. International Journal of Central Banking, 17(2), 1-42, https://www.ijcb.org/journal/ijcb21q2a1.htm.

Mooij, A. A. M. (2021). European Central Bank Digital Currency: the Digital Euro. What Design of the Digital Euro Is Possible Within the European Central Bank’s Legal Framework? BRIDGE Network Working Paper Series. No.14, Tilburg University, Tilburg.

Sayg?l?, H. (2012). Consumption (In)Efficiency and Financial Account Management. Bulletin of Economic Research, 64(3), 319-333. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8586.2010.00387.x

Taylor, J. B. (1993). Discretion Versus Policy Rules in Practice. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 39, 195-214. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2231(93)90009-L

Urbinati, E., Belsito, A., Cani, D., Caporrini, A., Capotosto, M., Folino, S., . . . Tiberi, P. (2021). A Digital Euro: a Contribution to the Discussion on Technical Design Choices. Manuscript. Bank of Italy, Rome.

Wang, G., & Hausken, K. (2021). Governmental Taxation of Households Choosing Between a National Currency and a Cryptocurrency. Games, 12(2), Article 34, https://doi.org/10.3390/g12020034.

Wang, G., & Hausken, K. (2022). Comparative Analysis of Households and Digital Currencies for the US, China and Russia. International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies, Forthcoming.

Wang, G., Zhang, S., Yu, T., & Ning, Y. (2021). A Systematic Overview of Blockchain Research. Journal of Systems Science and Information, 9(3), 205-238, https://doi.org/10.21078/JSSI-2021-205-34.

Wang, H., & Gao, S. (2021). The Future of the International Financial System: A CBDC Network and Regulatory Outlook. Manuscript. University of New South Wales, Sydney.

Welburn, J. W., & Hausken, K. (2015). A Game Theoretic Model of Economic Crises. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 266, 738-762. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2015.05.093

Welburn, J. W., & Hausken, K. (2017). Game Theoretic Modeling of Economic Systems and the European Debt Crisis. Computational Economics, 49(2), 177-226. doi:DOI 10.1007/s10614-015-9542-3




How to Cite

Wang, G. ., & Hausken, K. (2022). A Two-Period Decision Model for Central Bank Digital Currencies and Households. International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies (2147-4486), 11(2), 49–68. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijfbs.v11i2.1789