Comparisons of Website Visit Behavior between Purchase Outcomes and Product Categories
PDF

Keywords

Website Visit Behavior
Purchase Outcomes
Product Categories

How to Cite

Tangmanee, C. (2017). Comparisons of Website Visit Behavior between Purchase Outcomes and Product Categories. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478), 6(4), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v6i4.760

Abstract

The online retail business has grown substantially. Given distinctive product categories (e.g. search or experience goods), owners must put an effort in the design of websites so every visit may end with a purchase. Clickstream panel data allowing examination into website visiting behavior (i.e. the number of pages viewed (or pageview) or the visit duration) are increasingly accessible. However, it is unclear whether the differences of the two visiting behavior between purchase outcome or product categories are significant. The present study hopes to fill the void. An analysis of 27,528 visit sessions extracted from ComScore verifies that (1) the difference of page views between purchase outcomes and that between product categories were significant and (2) only the difference of visit duration between the product categories was significant but that between purchase outcomes was insignificant. In addition to theoretical insight into online behavior across purchasing horizons and product categories using clickstream data, online retail practitioners could apply the findings to enhance the possibility of the purchases at their online stores.

https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v6i4.760
PDF

References

Baird, N. (2017). Five Predictions For Retail in 2017. Available at https://www.forbes.com/ sites/nikkibaird/2017/01/04/five-predictions-for-retail-in-2017/#692da78d4882 Accessed on March 28, 2017.

Bucklin, R., Lattin, J., Ansari, A., Gupta, S., Bell, D., Coupey, E. Little, J. Mela, C., Montgomery, A. & Steckel, J. (2002). Choice and the Internet: From Clickstream to Research Stream, Marketing Letters, 13(3), 245-258.

Claase, M. (2014). Why Do Users Bond with Online Services?: A Literature Review on The Conceptualization of Online User Bonding in the Context of Online Services. Unpublished master Thesis. University of Twente. Available at http://essay.utwente.nl/65432/1/Claase_MA_ Behavioural_Management_ and_Social_Sciences.pdf. Accessed on March 28, 2017

Danaher, P. J. (2007). Modeling page views across multiple websites with an application to Internet reach and frequency prediction, Marketing Science, 26(3), 422-437. DOI: 10.1287/mksc.l060.022.

Danaher, P., Mallarkey, G., & Essegaier, S. (2006). Affecting web site visit duration: A cross-domain analysis, Journal of Marketing Research, 43(2), 182-194.

Gustafson, K. (2017). Retailers brace for 2017: Expect More Store Closings and Major Changes under Trump's Tax Policy. Available at http://www.cnbc.com/2016/12/27/retail-predictions-for-2017.html Accessed on March 28, 2017.

Hair, J. F. (2013). Essentials of marketing research, 3rd edition, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Huang, L., Jia, L., & Song, J. (2015). Antecedents of User Stickiness and Loyalty and Their Effects on Users’ Group-Buying Repurchase Intention. Available at http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2015/e-Biz/ GeneralPresentations/ 1/ Accessed on March 28, 2017.

Kim, S., Baek, T., Kim, Y.-K., & Yoo, K. (2016). Factors Affecting Stickiness and Word of Mouth in Mobile Applications, Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 10(3),177-192. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-06-2015-0046.

Kousha, K., & Thelwall, M. (2016). Can Amazon. com reviews help to assess the wider impacts of books?. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(3), 566-581. DOI: 10.1002/asi.23404.

Lin, J. (2007). Online Stickiness: Its Antecedents and Effect on Purchasing Intention. Behaviour & Information Technology, 26(6), 507-516. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01449290600740843.

Lin, L., Hu, P. J. H., Sheng, O. R. L., & Lee, J. (2010). Is stickiness profitable for electronic retailers?. Communications of the ACM, 53(3), 132-136. DOI: 10.1145/1666420.1666454

Mallapragada , G., Chandukala, S. R., & Liu, Q. (2016). Exploring the Effects of “What” (Product) and “Where” (Website) Characteristics on Online Shopping Behavior. Journal of Marketing, 80(2), 21-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jm.15.0138.

Moe, W. W. (2003). Buying, Searching, or Browsing: Differentiating Between Online Shoppers Using In-Store Navigational Clickstream. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(1&2), 29-39. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327663JCP13-1&2_03.

Moe, W. W. & Fader, P. S. (2004). Dynamic Conversion Behavior at E-Commerce Sites. Management Science, 50(3), 326-335. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1040.0153.

Montgomery, A. L., Li, S., Srinivasan, K., & Liechty, J. C. (2004). Modeling Online Browsing and Path Analysis Using Clickstream Data. Marketing Science, 23(4), 579-595. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1040.0073.

Okada, K. & Takahashi, H. (2015). Page View-Based Investor Attention and IPO Pricing. Unpublished manuscript. Available online at http://sfm.finance.nsysu.edu.tw/php/Papers/ CompletePaper/066-279035158.pdf. Accessed on March 28, 2017.

Olbrich, R. & Holsing, C. (2011). Modeling Customer Purchasing Behavior in Social Shopping Communities with Clickstream Data. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 16(2), 15-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.2753/JEC1086-4415160202.

Panagiotelis, A., Smith, M., & Danaher, P. (2014). From Amazon to Apple: Modeling Online Retail Sales, Purchase Incidence, and Visit Behavior, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 32(1), 14-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07350015.2013.835729.

Roy, S., Lassar, W., & T. Butaney, G. (2014). The Mediating Impact of Stickiness and Loyalty on Word-of-Mouth Promotion of Retail Websites: A Consumer Perspective. European Journal of Marketing, 48(9/10), 1828-1849. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-04-2013-0193.

Similarweb (2016). Amazon Analytics. Available at https://www.similarweb.com/website/ amazon.com Accessed on March 28, 2017.

Sunikka, A., Bragge, J., & Kallio, H. (2011). The Effectiveness of Personalized Marketing in Online Banking: A Comparison between Search and Experience Offerings. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 16(3-4), 183-194. https://doi.org/10.1057/fsm.2011.24.

Verheijden, R. (2012). Predicting purchasing behavior throughout the clickstream. Unpublished master thesis, Master of Science in Innovation Sciences, Eindhoven University of Technology.

Xun, J. (2015). Return on Web Site Visit Duration: Applying Web Analytics Data. Journal of Direct, Data and Digital Marketing Practice, 17(1), 54-70. https://doi.org/10.1057/dddmp.2015.33.

Yan, L., & Li, Chunping. (2006). Incorporating Pageview Weight into an Association-Rule-Based Web Recommendation System. in Australasian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 577-586.

Authors contributing to IJRBS agree to publish their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution- 4.0 NC license, allowing third parties to share their work (copy, distribute, transmit) and to adapt it, under the condition that the authors are given credit, that the work is not used for commercial purposes, and that in the event of reuse or distribution, the terms of this license are made clear. Authors retain copyright of their work, with first publication rights granted to IJRBS. However, authors are required to transfer copyrights associated with commercial use to the Publisher. The authors agree to the terms of this Copyright Notice, which will apply to this submission if and when it is published by this journal

Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously( exceptin the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, it will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other languages, without the written consent of the Publisher. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication