How a leader’s status distance stimulates employee job performance

The moderating effect of employee loyalty and task interdependence

  • Sagarika Irangani Huazhong University of Science and Technology
  • Zhiqiang Liu Huazhong University of Science and Technology
  • Weedige Sampath Sanjeewa Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Keywords: Status distance, Status threats, Task interdependence, Loyalty, Job performance, Power distance theory,

Abstract

Status is an important circumstance for  People’s subjective “well-being, self-esteem, and mental and physical health”. The paper aimed to test how leader status stimulates the quality of employee job performance in the organization. We argue that in spite of the benefits of having low-status distance who be faced with a comparable loss of status individuals experience more “self-threat” and hence status is threatened tend to engage in disruptive behavior to deliberately inflicts others through actions such as disapproving and acting unkindly. consequently, when the leader -Team member relationship is worse less perception of leader provided less performance of team members and relatively more perception offered to better performance of employees. We investigated these assumptions involving 240 employees (N = 240). Our findings help to explain why leaders sometimes challenge others who present an immediate threat to their status. As such, we extend theorizing on the power distance, organizational bureaucracy, and leader-member exchange. Results from survey study show a curvilinear relationship between status distance and team member job performance, these detectings offer an empirical basis and theoretical inspiration to consider status distance as a critical variable in the possessions of status differences on interpersonal dynamics. Importantly, this work also offers an applicable and timely viewpoint for managers debating the cost and benefits of various hierarchical alignment in organizations.

Author Biographies

Zhiqiang Liu, Huazhong University of Science and Technology

Zhiqiang Liu(professor)

       Department of Business Administration , School of Management,

         Huazhong University of Science &   Technology,

         Wuhan, China

         Email: zqliu@hust.edu.cn

Weedige Sampath Sanjeewa, Huazhong University of Science and Technology

         Weedige Sampath Sanjeewa ,

         School of Economics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology,

         1037 Luoyu Road, Hongshan District,

         Wuhan 430074, P.R.China ;

         Email: sanjeewa@wyb.ac.lk

References

Adler, N. E., Epel, E. S., Castellazzo, G., & Ickovics, J. R. J. H. p. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy, White women. 19(6), 586. doi:https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0278-6133.19.6.586

Anderson, C., Hildreth, J. A. D., & Howland, L. (2015). Is the desire for status a fundamental human motive? A review of the empirical literature. Psychol Bull, 141(3), 574-601. doi:10.1037/a0038781

Anderson, C., John, O. P., Keltner, D., Kring, A. M. J. J. o. p., & psychology, s. (2001). Who attains social status? Effects of personality and physical attractiveness in social groups. 81(1), 116. doi:DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.81.1.116

Anderson, C., Srivastava, S., Beer, J. S., Spataro, S. E., Chatman, J. A. J. J. o. p., & psychology, s. (2006). Knowing your place: self-perceptions of status in face-to-face groups. 91(6), 1094. doi:DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.6.1094

Andrews, H. I. a. S. B. (1993). Power, Social Influence, and Sense Making: Effects of Network Centrality and Proximity on Employee Perceptions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, No. 2 pp. 277-303.

Aquino, K., Douglas, S. J. O. B., & Processes, H. D. (2003). Identity threat and antisocial behavior in organizations: The moderating effects of individual differences, aggressive modeling, and hierarchical status. 90(1), 195-208. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00517-4

Bachrach, D. G., Powell, B. C., Bendoly, E., & Richey, R. G. J. J. o. A. P. (2006). Organizational citizenship behavior and performance evaluations: Exploring the impact of task interdependence. 91(1), 193. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.193

Becker, T. E., Billings, R. S., Eveleth, D. M., & Gilbert, N. L. (1996). Foci and bases of employee commitment: Implications for job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39(2), 464-482. doi:DOI: 10.2307/256788

Berger, J., Rosenholtz, S. J., & Zelditch Jr, M. J. A. r. o. s. (1980). Status organizing processes. 6(1), 479-508. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.06.080180.002403

Blau, P. M. (1977). A macrosociological theory of social structure. American journal of sociology, 83(1), 26-54.

Bruins, J. J., & Wilke, H. A. (1993). Upward power tendencies in a hierarchy: Power distance theory versus bureaucratic rule. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23(3), 239-254.

Byrne, D. E. (1971). The attraction paradigm. Retrieved from http://books.google.com/books?id=Oye3AAAAIAAJ

Chen, Z. X., Tsui, A. S., Farh, J. L. J. J. o. o., & psychology, o. (2002). Loyalty to supervisor vs. organizational commitment: Relationships to employee performance in China. 75(3), 339-356. doi:https://doi.org/10.1348/096317902320369749

Cheng, B. (1993). The effects of organizational value on organizational commitment, organizational citizenship behavior, and job performance: a comparison of different weighting model and discrepancy model. Chinese journal of Psychology, 35(1), 43-58.

Cohen-Charash, Y., & Mueller, J. S. (2007). Does perceived unfairness exacerbate or mitigate interpersonal counterproductive work behaviors related to envy? J Appl Psychol, 92(3), 666-680. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.666

De Dreu, C. K. J. J. o. a. p. (2007). Cooperative outcome interdependence, task reflexivity, and team effectiveness: a motivated information processing perspective. 92(3), 628. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.628

DesJardins, N. M. L., Srivastava, S., Küfner, A. C. P., & Back, M. D. (2015). Who Attains Status? Similarities and Differences Across Social Contexts. 6(6), 692-700. doi:10.1177/1948550615580171

Duffy, M. K., Scott, K. L., Shaw, J. D., Tepper, B. J., & Aquino, K. J. A. o. M. J. (2012b). A social context model of envy and social undermining. 55(3), 643-666. doi:https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.0804

Erdogan, B., & Bauer, T. N. (2014). Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Theory: The Relational Approach to. The Oxford handbook of leadership and organizations, 407.

Eugene Kim, T. M. G. (2014). Victimization of High Performers:The Roles of Envy and Work Group Identification. Journal of Applied Psychology Vol. 99, No. 4, 619–634. doi:DOI: 10.1037/a0035789

Felson, R. B. (1978). Aggression as impression management. Social Psychology, 41(3), 205-213. doi:10.2307/3033557

Flynn, F. J., & Amanatullah, E. T. (2012). Psyched Up or Psyched Out? The Influence of Coactor Status on Individual Performance. Organization Science, 23(2), 402-415. doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0552

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. In: SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA.

Gomez, C., Kirkman, B., & Shapiro, D. (1999). The impact of power distance on the relationship between participation and organizational commitment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the academy of management.

Grant, A. M., Gino, F., & Hofmann, D. A. J. A. o. M. J. (2011). Reversing the extraverted leadership advantage: The role of employee proactivity. 54(3), 528-550. doi:https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.61968043

Gregersen, H. B. (1993). Multiple commitments at work and extrarole behavior during three stages of organizational tenure. Journal of Business Research.

Han, D., Lalwani, A. K., & Duhachek, A. J. J. o. C. R. (2017). Power distance belief, power, and charitable giving. 44(1), 182-195. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucw084

Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach: Guilford Publications.

Henderson, D. J., Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M., Bommer, W. H., & Tetrick, L. E. J. J. o. a. p. (2008b). Leader--member exchange, differentiation, and psychological contract fulfillment: A multilevel examination. 93(6), 1208. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012678

Hertel, G., Konradt, U., & Orlikowski, B. (2004). Managing distance by interdependence: Goal setting, task interdependence, and team-based rewards in virtual teams. European Journal of work and organizational psychology, 13(1), 1-28.

Heskett, J., Jones, T., Loveman, G., Sasser, E., & Schlesinger, L. (2008). Putting the Service-Profit Chain to Work. Harvard Business Review, July-August, 118-129. doi:citeulike-article-id:9676656

Hofstade, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. 2. In: Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Ibrahim, M., & Al Falasi, S. (2014). Employee loyalty and engagement in UAE public sector. Employee Relations, 36(5), 562-582.

Jain, S. S., & Jain, S. P. (2018). Power distance belief and preference for transparency. Journal of Business Research, 89, 135-142.

James R. Meindl, S. B. E. a. J. M. D. (1985). The Romance of Leadership. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 30, No. 1 ( ), pp. 78-102.

Kemper, T. D. (1991). Predicting emotions from social relations. Social Psychology Quarterly, 330-342.

Khatri, N. (2009). Consequences of power distance orientation in organisations. Vision, 13(1), 1-9.

Kirkman, B. L., Chen, G., Farh, J.-L., Chen, Z. X., & Lowe, K. B. (2009). Individual power distance orientation and follower reactions to transformational leaders: A cross-level, cross-cultural examination. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 744-764.

Kline, T. (1999). Remaking teams: The revolutionary research-based guide that puts theory into practice: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer San Francisco.

Langfred, C. W. (2007). The downside of self-management: A longitudinal study of the effects tf conflict on trust, autonomy, and task interdependence in self-managing teams. Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 885-900.

Langfred, C. W. (2016). Autonomy and Performance in Teams: The Multilevel Moderating Effect of Task Interdependence. Journal of Management, 31(4), 513-529. doi:10.1177/0149206304272190

Leary, M. R., Jongman-Sereno, K. P., & Diebels, K. J. (2014). The pursuit of status: A self-presentational perspective on the quest for social value. In The psychology of social status (pp. 159-178): Springer.

Lee, M. (1992). An explanation of the significance, influencing factors, and the results of behaviors of loyalty to organization: A case of middle and small enterprises in Taiwanese. unpublished Master's thesis, Institute of Applied Psychology, Fu Ren University, Taiwan (in Chinese).

Lee, Y.-t., & Antonakis, J. (2014). When preference is not satisfied but the individual is: How power distance moderates person–job fit. Journal of Management, 40(3), 641-675.

Liden, R. C., Erdogan, B., Wayne, S. J., Sparrowe, R. (2006), Occupational, Psychology, O., & Behavior.. Leader‐member exchange, differentiation, and task interdependence: implications for individual and group performance. 27(6), 723-746.

Linz, S., Good, L. K., & Busch, M. (2015). Promoting worker loyalty: an empirical analysis. International Journal of Manpower, 36(2), 169-191. doi:10.1108/ijm-06-2013-0129

Loveman, G. W. (1998). Employee satisfaction, customer loyalty, and financial performance: an empirical examination of the service profit chain in retail banking. Journal of service research, 1(1), 18-31.

Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). 8 social hierarchy: The self‐reinforcing nature of power and status. Academy of Management annals, 2(1), 351-398.

Marr, J. C., & Thau, S. (2014). Falling from great (and not-so-great) heights: How initial status position influences performance after status loss. Academy of Management Journal, 57(1), 223-248.

Miller, D. T. (2001). Disrespect and the experience of injustice. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 527-553. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.527

Mulder, M. (1976). Reduction of power differences in practice: The power distance reduction theory and its applications. European contributions to organization theory, 79, 94.

Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). MPlus: statistical analysis with latent variables--User's guide.

Netemeyer, R. G. (2010). Store Manager Performance and Satisfaction:Effects on Store Employee Performance and Satisfaction, Store Customer Satisfaction, and Store Customer Spending Growth. Journal of Applied Psychology. doi:10.1037/a0017630

Neuberg, S. L., & Cottrell, C. A. (2008). Managing the threats and opportunities afforded by human sociality. Group dynamics: theory, research, and practice, 12(1), 63.

Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric methods. In: New York: McGraw-Hill.

Pangil, F., & Moi Chan, J. (2014). The mediating effect of knowledge sharing on the relationship between trust and virtual team effectiveness. Journal of Knowledge Management, 18(1), 92-106.

Patrick D. Lynch, R. E., and Stephen Armeli. (1999). Perceived Organizational Support: Inferior Versus Superior Performance by Wary Employees. American psychological association.

Pearce, J. L., & Gregersen, H. B. (1991). Task interdependence and extrarole behavior: A test of the mediating effects of felt responsibility. Journal of applied Psychology, 76(6), 838.

Phillips, K. W., Rothbard, N. P., & Dumas, T. L. (2009). To disclose or not to disclose? Status distance and self-disclosure in diverse environments. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 34, No. 4, , 710–732.

Popper, M. J. T. L. Q. (2013). Leaders perceived as distant and close. Some implications for psychological theory on leadership. 24(1), 1-8.

Rego, A., & Simpson, A. V. (2018). The perceived impact of leaders’ humility on team effectiveness: an empirical study. Journal of Business Ethics, 148(1), 205-218.

Reh, S. (2017). Keeping (Future) Rivals Down: Temporal Social Comparison Predicts Coworker Social Undermining via Future Status Threat and Envy. Journal of Applied Psychology. doi:10.1037/apl0000281

Ren, Y., Harper, F. M., Drenner, S., Terveen, L., Kiesler, S., Riedl, J., & Kraut, R. E. (2012). Building member attachment in online communities: Applying theories of group identity and interpersonal bonds. Mis Quarterly, 841-864.

Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698-714. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.698

Ridgeway, C. L. (1984). Dominance, performance, and status in groups: A theoretical analysis. Advances in group processes, 1, 59-93.

Saavedra, R., Earley, P. C., & Van Dyne, L. J. J. o. a. p. (1993). Complex interdependence in task-performing groups. 78(1), 61.

Sarah P. Doyle, R. B. L., Jr.,Steffanie L. Wilk. (2014). Helping Others Most When They’re Not Too Close: Status Distance as a Determinant of Interpersonal Helping in Organizations. Academy of Management Discoveries.

Shalini Sarin Jaina, Shailendra Pratap Jainb. (2018). Power distance belief and preference for transparency. Journal of Business Research. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.04.016

Smith-Lovin, J. M. M. a. L. (1987). .

Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Pshlogical empowerment in the work place dimentions measurement and validation. Academy of Management Journal.

Stürmer, S., Snyder, M., Kropp, A., & Siem, B. (2006). Empathy-motivated helping: The moderating role of group membership. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(7), 943-956. doi: 10.1177/0146167206287363

Tai, K., Narayanan, J., & McAllister, D. J. (2012). Envy as pain: Rethinking the nature of envy and its implications for employees and organizations. Academy of Management Review, 37(1), 107-129.

Tesser, A. (1988). Toward a self-evaluation maintenance model of social behavior. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 181-227): Elsevier.

Triguero-Sánchez, R., C. Peña-Vinces, J., & Sánchez-Apellániz, M. (2013). Hierarchical distance as a moderator of HRM practices on organizational performance. International Journal of Manpower, 34(7), 794-812. doi:10.1108/ijm-03-2012-0046

Vidyarthi, P. R., Anand, S., & Liden, R. C. (2014). Do emotionally perceptive leaders motivate higher employee performance? The moderating role of task interdependence and power distance. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(2), 232-244.

Wang, X.-H. F., & Howell, J. M. (2010). Exploring the dual-level effects of transformational leadership on followers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(6), 1134.

Weng, L.-C. (2014). Improving Employee Job Performance through Ethical Leadership and'Guanxi': The Moderation Effects of Supervisor-subordinate guanxi differentiation. Asia Pacific Management Review, 19(3), 321.

Zhang, G. (2018). Status Threat and Ethical Leadership: A Power-Dependence Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-018-3972-5

Zhou, Y. (1983). The relationship between Chinese value system and managerial behaviors in large enterprises in Taiwan. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Institute of Business and Management, National Chengchi University, Taiwan (in Chinese).

Published
2019-10-20
How to Cite
Irangani, S., Liu, Z., & Sampath Sanjeewa, W. (2019). How a leader’s status distance stimulates employee job performance. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478), 8(6), 116-128. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v8i6.530
Section
Articles