Establishing idiosyncratic deals (i-deals) as a precursor to work role performance
Keywords:i-deals, work role performance, individualisation, proactive behaviour, social exchange theory
The study determines the relationship between i-deals and work role performance amongst employees across industries in the South African context. The study follows a quantitative approach, and a cross-sectional design was adopted. A non-probability convenience sampling technique was chosen. An online questionnaire was used. A total of 231 employees from various industries in Johannesburg, South Africa, were included in the sample. Data were collected using pre-established instruments, and SPSS was used to analyse data. Reliability analysis was used to determine the psychometric qualities of the instruments. Pearson correlation and multiple regression analysis were chosen to examine the data against the research objectives. The study’s findings confirmed a relationship between i-deals and work role performance. Task and work responsibility, schedule flexibility and career development predicted work role performance. The findings assist researchers and practitioners in dealing with and understanding how these customised work arrangements affect individual work role performance. Expanding knowledge of i?deals will help employees and employers improve their dynamic and organisational needs more effectively. HR practitioners will also use the concept of i-deals as a strategic tool to retain talented employees. The study adds to the literature on i-deals and their relationship to work role performance in a South African context. There are limited studies in South Africa regarding our knowledge of i-deals. The present study’s results contribute to the literature on i-deals and their relationship with work role performance within a South African context.
Anand, S., Hu, J., Vidyarthi, P. R., & Liden, R. C. (2018). Leader-member exchange as a linking pin in the I-deals - performance relationship in workgroups, Academy of Management Proceedings, 2018(1), 10663. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2018.10663abstract
Angelici, M. and Profeta, P. (2020). Smart-working: Work flexibility without constraints, SSRN Electronic Journal. (2020), 1-115.
Austin-Egole, I. S., Iheriohanma, E. B. J. and Nwokorie, C. (2020). Flexible working arrangements and organizational performance: An overview, IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS), 25(5), 50–59.
Bal, M. and Rousseau, D. M. (2015). The future of I-deal research: An agenda, in Idiosyncratic Deals Between Employees and Organizations. Routledge, 122–130.
Bal, P. M. and Jansen, P. G. W. (2016). Workplace flexibility across the lifespan, in Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 43–99.
Bal, P. M. (2017). Why do employees negotiate idiosyncratic deals?, An exploration of the process of i-deal negotiation. New Zealand Journal of Employment Relations, 42(1), 2-18.
Bergen, N. and Labonté, R. (2020). ‘everything is perfect, and we have no problems’: Detecting and limiting social desirability bias in qualitative research, Qualitative health research, 30(5), 783–792.
Çaliskan, E. and Torun, A. (2019). Individualized HR practices and idiosyncratic deals (i deals) and the expected positive individual and organizational outcomes, Istanbul Business Research, 48(1), 36–63.
Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors, Multivariate behavioral research, 1(2), 245–276.
Cropanzano, R. (2017). Social exchange theory: A critical review with theoretical remedies, Academy of Management annals, 11(1), 479–516.
Dhanpat, N. (2017). i-deal, i-craft, i-perform: A theoretical framework. Paper session presented at the Pan Pacific Conference, Vietnam.
Dias, A., Vieira, V. and Figlioli, B. (2020). Tracing the links between executive compensation structure and firm performance: evidence from the Brazilian market, Corporate Governance, 20(7), 1393–1408.
De Braine, R.T., & Dhanpat. N. (2019). Investigating the role of job resources in predicting employees’ strategic connection to the organization. Paper presented at the 13th International Business Conference, Hermanus, Cape Town
Engelen, L. et al. (2019). Is activity-based working impacting health, work performance and perceptions? A systematic review, Building Research and Information, 47(4), 468–479.
Griffin, M. A., Neal, A. and Parker, S. K. (2007). A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts, Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 327–347.
Guerrero, S., Bentein, K. and Lapalme, M.-È. (2014). Idiosyncratic deals and high performers’ organizational commitment, Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(2), 323–334.
Hauschildt, K. and Konradt, U. (2012). Self?leadership and team members’ work role performance, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 27(5), 497–517.
Ho, V. T. and Kong, D. T. (2015). Exploring the signaling function of idiosyncratic deals and their interaction, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 131, 149–161.
Ho, V. T. and Tekleab, A. G. (2016). A model of idiosyncratic deal-making and attitudinal outcomes, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31(3), 642–656.
Hornung, S., Rousseau, D. M., Glaser, J., Angerer, P., & Weigl, M. (2010). Beyond top?down and bottom?up work redesign: Customizing job content through idiosyncratic deals. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(2?3), 187-215.
Hornung, S., Rousseau, D. M. and Glaser, J. (2009). Why supervisors make idiosyncratic deals: antecedents and outcomes of i?deals from a managerial perspective, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24(8), 738–764.
Kelly, C. M., Rofcanin, Y., Las Heras, M., Ogbonnaya, C., Marescaux, E., & Bosch, M. J. (2020). Seeking an “i-deal, balance: Schedule-flexibility i deals as mediating mechanisms between supervisor emotional support and employee work and home performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 118, 103369.
Lai, L., Rousseau, D. M. and Chang, K. T. T. (2009). Idiosyncratic deals: co-workers as interested third parties, The Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 547–556.
Laulié, L., Tekleab, A. G. and Lee, J. J. (2021). Why grant i deals? Supervisors’ prior i deals, exchange ideology, and justice sensitivity, Journal of Business and Psychology, 36(1), 17–31.
Lin, B., Law, K. S. and Zhou, J. (2017). Why is underemployment related to creativity and OCB? A task-crafting explanation of the curvilinear moderated relations, Academy of Management journal, 60(1), 156–177. https://doi.org/ 10.5465/amj.2014.0470.
Liao, C., Wayne, S. J., & Rousseau, D. M. (2016). Idiosyncratic deals in contemporary organizations: A qualitative and meta?analytical, review. Journal of organizational behavior, 37, S9-S29.
Liu, J. et al. (2013). Idiosyncratic deals and employee outcomes: The mediating roles of social exchange and self-enhancement and the moderating role of individualism, Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(5). 832.
Mason, C., Griffin, M. and Parker, S. (2014). Transformational leadership development: Connecting psychological and behavioral change, Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 35(3), 174–194.
Neal, A., Yeo, G., Koy, A., & Xiao, T. (2012). Predicting the form and direction of work role performance from the Big 5 model of personality traits, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(2), 175-192.
Oostrom, J. K., Pennings, M. and Bal, P. M. (2016). How do idiosyncratic deals contribute to the employability of older workers?, Career Development International, 21(2), 176–192.
Otero-Neira, C., Varela-Neira, C. and Bande, B. (2016). Supervisory servant leadership and employee’s work role performance: A multilevel mediation model, Leadership & Organization development journal, 37(7), 860–881.
Parker, S. K., & Collins, C. G. (2010). Taking stock: Integrating and differentiating multiple proactive behaviors, Journal of Management, 36(3), 633–662. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308321554
Park, Sohee and Park, Sunyoung (2019). Employee adaptive performance and its antecedents: Review and synthesis, Human Resource Development Review, 18(3), 294–324.
Pallant, J. (2011). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (6th ed.). New York: Open University Press.
Pluye, P., Grad, R. M., Levine, A., & Nicolau, B. (2009). Understanding divergence of quantitative and qualitative data (or results) in mixed methods studies, International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 3(1), 58-72.
Rofcanin, Y., Las Heras, M., Jose Bosch, M., Stollberger, J. & Mayer, M., (2021). How do weekly obtained task i-deals improve work performance? The role of relational context and structural job resources, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 30(4),555-565.
Rousseau, D. (2005) I deals, idiosyncratic deals employees bargain for themselves. Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe.
Rousseau, D. (2015). I-deals: Idiosyncratic deals employees bargain for themselves: Idiosyncratic deals employees bargain for themselves. Routledge.
Rousseau, D. M. (2001). The idiosyncratic deals: Flexibility versus fairness? Organisational Dynamics, 29(4), 260–287.
Rousseau, D. M., Ho, V. T. and Greenberg, J. (2006). I deals: Idiosyncratic terms in employment relationships, Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 977–994.
Rousseau, D. M., Tomprou, M. and Simosi, M. (2016). Negotiating flexible and fair idiosyncratic deals (i-deals), Organizational Dynamics, 45(3), 185–196.
Rosen, C. C., Slater, D. J., Chang, C. H., & Johnson, R. E. (2013). Let’s make a deal: Development and validation of the ex post i deals scale, Journal of Management, 39(3), 709-742.
Ryan, A. M. and Wessel, J. L. (2015). Implications of a changing workforce and workplace for justice perceptions and expectations, Human resource management review, 25(2), 162–175.
Simosi, M., Rousseau, D. M., & Weingart, L. R. (2021). Opening the black box of i-deals negotiation: integrating i-deals and negotiation research, Group & Organization Management, 46(2), 186-222.
Van Dyk, J., Coetzee, M., & Takawira, N. (2013). Satisfaction with retention factors as predictors of the job embeddedness of medical and information technology services staff, Southern African Business Review, 17(1), 57–75.
Taser, D., Rofcanin, Y., Las Heras, M., & Bosch, M. J. (2021). Flexibility I deals and prosocial motives: a trickle-down perspective, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1-26.
Tauba, M. and Kimwolo, A. (2021). Development idiosyncratic deals and employee performance, SEISENSE Journal of Management, 4(3), 63–72.
Vidyarthi, P. R. et al. (2016). Individual deals within teams: Investigating the role of relative i-deals for employee performance, The Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(11), 1536–1552. https://doi.org/ 10.1037/apl0000145.
Wang, P. et al. (2019). Idiosyncratic deals and work?to?family conflict and enrichment: The mediating roles of fit perceptions and efficacy beliefs, Human Resource Management Journal, 29(4), 600–619. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/1748-8583.12246.
Wang, S., Liu, Y. and Shalley, C. E. (2018). Idiosyncratic deals and employee creativity: The mediating role of creative self-efficacy, Human Resource Management, 57(6), 1443–1453. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/hrm.21917.
Wang, P., Wang, S., Yao, X., Hsu, I. C., & Lawler, J. (2019). Idiosyncratic deals and work?to?family conflict and enrichment: The mediating roles of fit perceptions and efficacy beliefs, Human Resource Management Journal, 29(4), 600-619.
Yang, X. (2020). Review of Idiosyncratic Deals in Organization: From the Dual Perspective of ‘i-Dealers’ and ‘Co-Workers,’, American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 10(03), 645.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2022 Nelesh Dhanpat, Lebone Legoabe
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
For all articles published in IJRBS, copyright is retained by the authors. Articles are licensed under an open access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download and read the paper for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted provided that the original published version is cited. These conditions allow for maximum use and exposure of the work, while ensuring that the authors receive proper credit.